Knowledge and attitudes on implementing cardiovascular pharmacogenomic testing

Abstract Pharmacogenomics has the potential to inform drug dosing and selection, reduce adverse events, and improve medication efficacy; however, provider knowledge of pharmacogenomic testing varies across provider types and specialties. Given that many actionable pharmacogenomic genes are implicate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Callan Russell, MaryAnn Campion, Megan E. Grove, Kelly Matsuda, Teri E. Klein, Euan Ashley, Hetanshi Naik, Matthew T. Wheeler, Stuart A. Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-03-01
Series:Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13737
_version_ 1797244860662546432
author Callan Russell
MaryAnn Campion
Megan E. Grove
Kelly Matsuda
Teri E. Klein
Euan Ashley
Hetanshi Naik
Matthew T. Wheeler
Stuart A. Scott
author_facet Callan Russell
MaryAnn Campion
Megan E. Grove
Kelly Matsuda
Teri E. Klein
Euan Ashley
Hetanshi Naik
Matthew T. Wheeler
Stuart A. Scott
author_sort Callan Russell
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Pharmacogenomics has the potential to inform drug dosing and selection, reduce adverse events, and improve medication efficacy; however, provider knowledge of pharmacogenomic testing varies across provider types and specialties. Given that many actionable pharmacogenomic genes are implicated in cardiovascular medication response variability, this study aimed to evaluate cardiology providers' knowledge and attitudes on implementing clinical pharmacogenomic testing. Sixty‐one providers responded to an online survey, including pharmacists (46%), physicians (31%), genetic counselors (15%), and nurses (8%). Most respondents (94%) reported previous genetics education; however, only 52% felt their genetics education prepared them to order a clinical pharmacogenomic test. In addition, most respondents (66%) were familiar with pharmacogenomics, with genetic counselors being most likely to be familiar (p < 0.001). Only 15% of respondents had previously ordered a clinical pharmacogenomic test and a total of 36% indicated they are likely to order a pharmacogenomic test in the future; however, the vast majority of respondents (89%) were interested in pharmacogenomic testing being incorporated into diagnostic cardiovascular genetic tests. Moreover, 84% of providers preferred pharmacogenomic panel testing compared to 16% who preferred single gene testing. Half of the providers reported being comfortable discussing pharmacogenomic results with their patients, but the majority (60%) expressed discomfort with the logistics of test ordering. Reported barriers to implementation included uncertainty about the clinical utility and difficulty choosing an appropriate test. Taken together, cardiology providers have moderate familiarity with pharmacogenomics and limited experience with test ordering; however, they are interested in incorporating pharmacogenomics into diagnostic genetic tests and ordering pharmacogenomic panels.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T19:17:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b38a2859a532460eb13ce046c3411157
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-8054
1752-8062
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:17:43Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-b38a2859a532460eb13ce046c34111572024-03-26T04:50:32ZengWileyClinical and Translational Science1752-80541752-80622024-03-01173n/an/a10.1111/cts.13737Knowledge and attitudes on implementing cardiovascular pharmacogenomic testingCallan Russell0MaryAnn Campion1Megan E. Grove2Kelly Matsuda3Teri E. Klein4Euan Ashley5Hetanshi Naik6Matthew T. Wheeler7Stuart A. Scott8Department of Genetics Stanford University Stanford California USADepartment of Genetics Stanford University Stanford California USAClinical Genomics Laboratory Stanford Medicine Palo Alto California USADivision of Pharmacy and Cardiology Stanford Health Care Palo Alto California USADepartment of Biomedical Data Science Stanford University Stanford California USAStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease Stanford California USADepartment of Genetics Stanford University Stanford California USAStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease Stanford California USAClinical Genomics Laboratory Stanford Medicine Palo Alto California USAAbstract Pharmacogenomics has the potential to inform drug dosing and selection, reduce adverse events, and improve medication efficacy; however, provider knowledge of pharmacogenomic testing varies across provider types and specialties. Given that many actionable pharmacogenomic genes are implicated in cardiovascular medication response variability, this study aimed to evaluate cardiology providers' knowledge and attitudes on implementing clinical pharmacogenomic testing. Sixty‐one providers responded to an online survey, including pharmacists (46%), physicians (31%), genetic counselors (15%), and nurses (8%). Most respondents (94%) reported previous genetics education; however, only 52% felt their genetics education prepared them to order a clinical pharmacogenomic test. In addition, most respondents (66%) were familiar with pharmacogenomics, with genetic counselors being most likely to be familiar (p < 0.001). Only 15% of respondents had previously ordered a clinical pharmacogenomic test and a total of 36% indicated they are likely to order a pharmacogenomic test in the future; however, the vast majority of respondents (89%) were interested in pharmacogenomic testing being incorporated into diagnostic cardiovascular genetic tests. Moreover, 84% of providers preferred pharmacogenomic panel testing compared to 16% who preferred single gene testing. Half of the providers reported being comfortable discussing pharmacogenomic results with their patients, but the majority (60%) expressed discomfort with the logistics of test ordering. Reported barriers to implementation included uncertainty about the clinical utility and difficulty choosing an appropriate test. Taken together, cardiology providers have moderate familiarity with pharmacogenomics and limited experience with test ordering; however, they are interested in incorporating pharmacogenomics into diagnostic genetic tests and ordering pharmacogenomic panels.https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13737
spellingShingle Callan Russell
MaryAnn Campion
Megan E. Grove
Kelly Matsuda
Teri E. Klein
Euan Ashley
Hetanshi Naik
Matthew T. Wheeler
Stuart A. Scott
Knowledge and attitudes on implementing cardiovascular pharmacogenomic testing
Clinical and Translational Science
title Knowledge and attitudes on implementing cardiovascular pharmacogenomic testing
title_full Knowledge and attitudes on implementing cardiovascular pharmacogenomic testing
title_fullStr Knowledge and attitudes on implementing cardiovascular pharmacogenomic testing
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge and attitudes on implementing cardiovascular pharmacogenomic testing
title_short Knowledge and attitudes on implementing cardiovascular pharmacogenomic testing
title_sort knowledge and attitudes on implementing cardiovascular pharmacogenomic testing
url https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13737
work_keys_str_mv AT callanrussell knowledgeandattitudesonimplementingcardiovascularpharmacogenomictesting
AT maryanncampion knowledgeandattitudesonimplementingcardiovascularpharmacogenomictesting
AT meganegrove knowledgeandattitudesonimplementingcardiovascularpharmacogenomictesting
AT kellymatsuda knowledgeandattitudesonimplementingcardiovascularpharmacogenomictesting
AT terieklein knowledgeandattitudesonimplementingcardiovascularpharmacogenomictesting
AT euanashley knowledgeandattitudesonimplementingcardiovascularpharmacogenomictesting
AT hetanshinaik knowledgeandattitudesonimplementingcardiovascularpharmacogenomictesting
AT matthewtwheeler knowledgeandattitudesonimplementingcardiovascularpharmacogenomictesting
AT stuartascott knowledgeandattitudesonimplementingcardiovascularpharmacogenomictesting