The establishment of surrogates and correlates of protection: Useful tools for the licensure of effective influenza vaccines?

The search for a test that can predict vaccine efficacy is an important part of any vaccine development program. Although regulators hesitate to acknowledge any test as a true ‘correlate of protection’, there are many precedents for defining ‘surrogate’ assays. Surrogates can be powerful tools for v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brian J. Ward, Stephane Pillet, Nathalie Charland, Sonia Trepanier, Julie Couillard, Nathalie Landry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-03-01
Series:Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1413518
_version_ 1797677567829868544
author Brian J. Ward
Stephane Pillet
Nathalie Charland
Sonia Trepanier
Julie Couillard
Nathalie Landry
author_facet Brian J. Ward
Stephane Pillet
Nathalie Charland
Sonia Trepanier
Julie Couillard
Nathalie Landry
author_sort Brian J. Ward
collection DOAJ
description The search for a test that can predict vaccine efficacy is an important part of any vaccine development program. Although regulators hesitate to acknowledge any test as a true ‘correlate of protection’, there are many precedents for defining ‘surrogate’ assays. Surrogates can be powerful tools for vaccine optimization, licensure, comparisons between products and development of improved products. When such tests achieve ‘reference’ status however, they can inadvertently become barriers to new technologies that do not work the same way as existing vaccines. This is particularly true when these tests are based upon circularly-defined ‘reference’ or, even worse, proprietary reagents. The situation with inactivated influenza vaccines is a good example of this phenomenon. The most frequently used tests to define vaccine-induced immunity are all serologic assays: hemagglutination inhibition (HI), single radial hemolysis (SRH) and microneutralization (MN). The first two, and particularly the HI assay, have achieved reference status and criteria have been established in many jurisdictions for their use in licensing new vaccines and to compare the performance of different vaccines. However, all of these assays are based on biological reagents that are notoriously difficult to standardize and can vary substantially by geography, by chance (i.e. developing reagents in eggs that may not antigenitically match wild-type viruses) and by intention (ie: choosing reagents that yield the most favorable results). This review describes attempts to standardize these assays to improve their performance as surrogates, the dangers of over-reliance on ‘reference’ serologic assays, the ways that manufacturers can exploit the existing regulatory framework to make their products ‘look good’ and the implications of this long-established system for the introduction of novel influenza vaccines.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T22:46:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b38b3b67e6ba45d5a11dcc4f50af483b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2164-5515
2164-554X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T22:46:01Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
spelling doaj.art-b38b3b67e6ba45d5a11dcc4f50af483b2023-09-22T08:17:53ZengTaylor & Francis GroupHuman Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics2164-55152164-554X2018-03-0114364765610.1080/21645515.2017.14135181413518The establishment of surrogates and correlates of protection: Useful tools for the licensure of effective influenza vaccines?Brian J. Ward0Stephane Pillet1Nathalie Charland2Sonia Trepanier3Julie Couillard4Nathalie Landry5Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Infectious Diseases DivisionResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Infectious Diseases DivisionMedicago IncMedicago IncMedicago IncMedicago IncThe search for a test that can predict vaccine efficacy is an important part of any vaccine development program. Although regulators hesitate to acknowledge any test as a true ‘correlate of protection’, there are many precedents for defining ‘surrogate’ assays. Surrogates can be powerful tools for vaccine optimization, licensure, comparisons between products and development of improved products. When such tests achieve ‘reference’ status however, they can inadvertently become barriers to new technologies that do not work the same way as existing vaccines. This is particularly true when these tests are based upon circularly-defined ‘reference’ or, even worse, proprietary reagents. The situation with inactivated influenza vaccines is a good example of this phenomenon. The most frequently used tests to define vaccine-induced immunity are all serologic assays: hemagglutination inhibition (HI), single radial hemolysis (SRH) and microneutralization (MN). The first two, and particularly the HI assay, have achieved reference status and criteria have been established in many jurisdictions for their use in licensing new vaccines and to compare the performance of different vaccines. However, all of these assays are based on biological reagents that are notoriously difficult to standardize and can vary substantially by geography, by chance (i.e. developing reagents in eggs that may not antigenitically match wild-type viruses) and by intention (ie: choosing reagents that yield the most favorable results). This review describes attempts to standardize these assays to improve their performance as surrogates, the dangers of over-reliance on ‘reference’ serologic assays, the ways that manufacturers can exploit the existing regulatory framework to make their products ‘look good’ and the implications of this long-established system for the introduction of novel influenza vaccines.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1413518influenza virusvaccinecorrelates of protectionreference reagentsreference assaysstandardization
spellingShingle Brian J. Ward
Stephane Pillet
Nathalie Charland
Sonia Trepanier
Julie Couillard
Nathalie Landry
The establishment of surrogates and correlates of protection: Useful tools for the licensure of effective influenza vaccines?
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
influenza virus
vaccine
correlates of protection
reference reagents
reference assays
standardization
title The establishment of surrogates and correlates of protection: Useful tools for the licensure of effective influenza vaccines?
title_full The establishment of surrogates and correlates of protection: Useful tools for the licensure of effective influenza vaccines?
title_fullStr The establishment of surrogates and correlates of protection: Useful tools for the licensure of effective influenza vaccines?
title_full_unstemmed The establishment of surrogates and correlates of protection: Useful tools for the licensure of effective influenza vaccines?
title_short The establishment of surrogates and correlates of protection: Useful tools for the licensure of effective influenza vaccines?
title_sort establishment of surrogates and correlates of protection useful tools for the licensure of effective influenza vaccines
topic influenza virus
vaccine
correlates of protection
reference reagents
reference assays
standardization
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1413518
work_keys_str_mv AT brianjward theestablishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT stephanepillet theestablishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT nathaliecharland theestablishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT soniatrepanier theestablishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT juliecouillard theestablishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT nathalielandry theestablishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT brianjward establishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT stephanepillet establishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT nathaliecharland establishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT soniatrepanier establishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT juliecouillard establishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines
AT nathalielandry establishmentofsurrogatesandcorrelatesofprotectionusefultoolsforthelicensureofeffectiveinfluenzavaccines