Benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two-qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platform
The possibility to utilize different types of two-qubit gates on a single quantum computing platform adds flexibility in the decomposition of quantum algorithms. A larger hardware-native gate set may decrease the number of required gates, provided that all gates are realized with high fidelity. Here...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
American Physical Society
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | Physical Review Research |
| Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033447 |
| _version_ | 1797211287550164992 |
|---|---|
| author | M. Ganzhorn G. Salis D. J. Egger A. Fuhrer M. Mergenthaler C. Müller P. Müller S. Paredes M. Pechal M. Werninghaus S. Filipp |
| author_facet | M. Ganzhorn G. Salis D. J. Egger A. Fuhrer M. Mergenthaler C. Müller P. Müller S. Paredes M. Pechal M. Werninghaus S. Filipp |
| author_sort | M. Ganzhorn |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The possibility to utilize different types of two-qubit gates on a single quantum computing platform adds flexibility in the decomposition of quantum algorithms. A larger hardware-native gate set may decrease the number of required gates, provided that all gates are realized with high fidelity. Here, we benchmark both controlled-Z (CZ) and exchange-type (iSWAP) gates using a parametrically driven tunable coupler that mediates the interaction between two superconducting qubits. Using randomized benchmarking protocols we estimate an error per gate of 0.9±0.03 and 1.3±0.4% for the CZ and the iSWAP gate, respectively. We argue that spurious ZZ-type couplings are the dominant error source for the iSWAP gate, and that phase stability of all microwave drives is of utmost importance. Such differences in the achievable fidelities for different two-qubit gates have to be taken into account when mapping quantum algorithms to real hardware. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T10:24:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b38d9cbe131f4ebc93c5e08bdddebb86 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2643-1564 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T10:24:06Z |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | American Physical Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Physical Review Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-b38d9cbe131f4ebc93c5e08bdddebb862024-04-12T17:00:50ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Research2643-15642020-09-012303344710.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033447Benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two-qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platformM. GanzhornG. SalisD. J. EggerA. FuhrerM. MergenthalerC. MüllerP. MüllerS. ParedesM. PechalM. WerninghausS. FilippThe possibility to utilize different types of two-qubit gates on a single quantum computing platform adds flexibility in the decomposition of quantum algorithms. A larger hardware-native gate set may decrease the number of required gates, provided that all gates are realized with high fidelity. Here, we benchmark both controlled-Z (CZ) and exchange-type (iSWAP) gates using a parametrically driven tunable coupler that mediates the interaction between two superconducting qubits. Using randomized benchmarking protocols we estimate an error per gate of 0.9±0.03 and 1.3±0.4% for the CZ and the iSWAP gate, respectively. We argue that spurious ZZ-type couplings are the dominant error source for the iSWAP gate, and that phase stability of all microwave drives is of utmost importance. Such differences in the achievable fidelities for different two-qubit gates have to be taken into account when mapping quantum algorithms to real hardware.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033447 |
| spellingShingle | M. Ganzhorn G. Salis D. J. Egger A. Fuhrer M. Mergenthaler C. Müller P. Müller S. Paredes M. Pechal M. Werninghaus S. Filipp Benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two-qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platform Physical Review Research |
| title | Benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two-qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platform |
| title_full | Benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two-qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platform |
| title_fullStr | Benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two-qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platform |
| title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two-qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platform |
| title_short | Benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two-qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platform |
| title_sort | benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platform |
| url | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033447 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mganzhorn benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform AT gsalis benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform AT djegger benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform AT afuhrer benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform AT mmergenthaler benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform AT cmuller benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform AT pmuller benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform AT sparedes benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform AT mpechal benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform AT mwerninghaus benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform AT sfilipp benchmarkingthenoisesensitivityofdifferentparametrictwoqubitgatesinasinglesuperconductingquantumcomputingplatform |