Automatic detection, identification and counting of anguilliform fish using in situ acoustic camera data: Development of a cross-camera morphological analysis approach.

Acoustic cameras are increasingly used in monitoring studies of diadromous fish populations, even though analyzing them is time-consuming. In complex in situ contexts, anguilliform fish may be especially difficult to identify automatically using acoustic camera data because the undulation of their b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Azénor Le Quinio, Eric De Oliveira, Alexandre Girard, Jean Guillard, Jean-Marc Roussel, Fabrice Zaoui, François Martignac
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273588
_version_ 1811161641793880064
author Azénor Le Quinio
Eric De Oliveira
Alexandre Girard
Jean Guillard
Jean-Marc Roussel
Fabrice Zaoui
François Martignac
author_facet Azénor Le Quinio
Eric De Oliveira
Alexandre Girard
Jean Guillard
Jean-Marc Roussel
Fabrice Zaoui
François Martignac
author_sort Azénor Le Quinio
collection DOAJ
description Acoustic cameras are increasingly used in monitoring studies of diadromous fish populations, even though analyzing them is time-consuming. In complex in situ contexts, anguilliform fish may be especially difficult to identify automatically using acoustic camera data because the undulation of their body frequently results in fragmented targets. Our study aimed to develop a method based on a succession of computer vision techniques, in order to automatically detect, identify and count anguilliform fish using data from multiple models of acoustic cameras. Indeed, several models of cameras, owning specific technical characteristics, are used to monitor fish populations, causing major differences in the recorded data shapes and resolutions. The method was applied to two large datasets recorded at two distinct monitoring sites with populations of European eels with different length distributions. The method yielded promising results for large eels, with more than 75% of eels automatically identified successfully using datasets from ARIS and BlueView cameras. However, only 42% of eels shorter than 60 cm were detected, with the best model performances observed for detection ranges of 4-9 m. Although improvements are required to compensate for fish-length limitations, our cross-camera method is promising for automatically detecting and counting large eels in long-term monitoring studies in complex environments.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T06:18:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b39ff834316e4cd891c0eb186247463f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T06:18:47Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-b39ff834316e4cd891c0eb186247463f2023-03-02T05:32:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01182e027358810.1371/journal.pone.0273588Automatic detection, identification and counting of anguilliform fish using in situ acoustic camera data: Development of a cross-camera morphological analysis approach.Azénor Le QuinioEric De OliveiraAlexandre GirardJean GuillardJean-Marc RousselFabrice ZaouiFrançois MartignacAcoustic cameras are increasingly used in monitoring studies of diadromous fish populations, even though analyzing them is time-consuming. In complex in situ contexts, anguilliform fish may be especially difficult to identify automatically using acoustic camera data because the undulation of their body frequently results in fragmented targets. Our study aimed to develop a method based on a succession of computer vision techniques, in order to automatically detect, identify and count anguilliform fish using data from multiple models of acoustic cameras. Indeed, several models of cameras, owning specific technical characteristics, are used to monitor fish populations, causing major differences in the recorded data shapes and resolutions. The method was applied to two large datasets recorded at two distinct monitoring sites with populations of European eels with different length distributions. The method yielded promising results for large eels, with more than 75% of eels automatically identified successfully using datasets from ARIS and BlueView cameras. However, only 42% of eels shorter than 60 cm were detected, with the best model performances observed for detection ranges of 4-9 m. Although improvements are required to compensate for fish-length limitations, our cross-camera method is promising for automatically detecting and counting large eels in long-term monitoring studies in complex environments.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273588
spellingShingle Azénor Le Quinio
Eric De Oliveira
Alexandre Girard
Jean Guillard
Jean-Marc Roussel
Fabrice Zaoui
François Martignac
Automatic detection, identification and counting of anguilliform fish using in situ acoustic camera data: Development of a cross-camera morphological analysis approach.
PLoS ONE
title Automatic detection, identification and counting of anguilliform fish using in situ acoustic camera data: Development of a cross-camera morphological analysis approach.
title_full Automatic detection, identification and counting of anguilliform fish using in situ acoustic camera data: Development of a cross-camera morphological analysis approach.
title_fullStr Automatic detection, identification and counting of anguilliform fish using in situ acoustic camera data: Development of a cross-camera morphological analysis approach.
title_full_unstemmed Automatic detection, identification and counting of anguilliform fish using in situ acoustic camera data: Development of a cross-camera morphological analysis approach.
title_short Automatic detection, identification and counting of anguilliform fish using in situ acoustic camera data: Development of a cross-camera morphological analysis approach.
title_sort automatic detection identification and counting of anguilliform fish using in situ acoustic camera data development of a cross camera morphological analysis approach
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273588
work_keys_str_mv AT azenorlequinio automaticdetectionidentificationandcountingofanguilliformfishusinginsituacousticcameradatadevelopmentofacrosscameramorphologicalanalysisapproach
AT ericdeoliveira automaticdetectionidentificationandcountingofanguilliformfishusinginsituacousticcameradatadevelopmentofacrosscameramorphologicalanalysisapproach
AT alexandregirard automaticdetectionidentificationandcountingofanguilliformfishusinginsituacousticcameradatadevelopmentofacrosscameramorphologicalanalysisapproach
AT jeanguillard automaticdetectionidentificationandcountingofanguilliformfishusinginsituacousticcameradatadevelopmentofacrosscameramorphologicalanalysisapproach
AT jeanmarcroussel automaticdetectionidentificationandcountingofanguilliformfishusinginsituacousticcameradatadevelopmentofacrosscameramorphologicalanalysisapproach
AT fabricezaoui automaticdetectionidentificationandcountingofanguilliformfishusinginsituacousticcameradatadevelopmentofacrosscameramorphologicalanalysisapproach
AT francoismartignac automaticdetectionidentificationandcountingofanguilliformfishusinginsituacousticcameradatadevelopmentofacrosscameramorphologicalanalysisapproach