Regulating Craving by Anticipating Positive and Negative Outcomes: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis and Network Connectivity Approach

During self-control, we may resist short-term temptations in order to reach a favorable future (e.g., resisting cake to stay healthy). The neural basis of self-control is typically attributed to “cold,” unemotional cognitive control mechanisms which inhibit affect-related regions via the prefrontal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johann D. Kruschwitz, Vera U. Ludwig, Lea Waller, David List, David Wisniewski, Uta Wolfensteller, Thomas Goschke, Henrik Walter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00297/full
_version_ 1811283084850495488
author Johann D. Kruschwitz
Johann D. Kruschwitz
Vera U. Ludwig
Vera U. Ludwig
Vera U. Ludwig
Lea Waller
Lea Waller
David List
David List
David Wisniewski
Uta Wolfensteller
Uta Wolfensteller
Thomas Goschke
Thomas Goschke
Henrik Walter
author_facet Johann D. Kruschwitz
Johann D. Kruschwitz
Vera U. Ludwig
Vera U. Ludwig
Vera U. Ludwig
Lea Waller
Lea Waller
David List
David List
David Wisniewski
Uta Wolfensteller
Uta Wolfensteller
Thomas Goschke
Thomas Goschke
Henrik Walter
author_sort Johann D. Kruschwitz
collection DOAJ
description During self-control, we may resist short-term temptations in order to reach a favorable future (e.g., resisting cake to stay healthy). The neural basis of self-control is typically attributed to “cold,” unemotional cognitive control mechanisms which inhibit affect-related regions via the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Here, we investigate the neural underpinnings of regulating cravings by mentally evoking the positive consequences of resisting a temptation (e.g., being healthy) as opposed to evoking the negative consequences of giving in to a temptation (e.g., becoming overweight). It is conceivable that when using these types of strategies, regions associated with emotional processing [e.g., striatum, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)] are involved in addition to control-related prefrontal and parietal regions. Thirty-one participants saw pictures of unhealthy snacks in the fMRI scanner and, depending on the trial, regulated their craving by thinking of the positive consequences of resisting, or the negative consequences of not resisting. In a control condition, they anticipated the pleasure of eating and thus, allowed the craving to occur (now-condition). In line with previous studies, we found activation of a cognitive control network during self-regulation. In the negative future thinking condition, the insula was more active than in the positive condition, while there were no activations that were stronger in the positive (> negative) future thinking condition. However, additionally, multivariate pattern analysis showed that during craving regulation, information about the valence of anticipated emotions was present in the vmPFC, the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the insula. Moreover, a network including vmPFC and PCC showed higher connectivity during the positive (> negative) future thinking condition. Since these regions are often associated with affective processing, these findings suggest that “hot,” affective processes may, at least in certain circumstances, play a role in self-control.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:04:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b3b1d8900aff4be392b419ab90716ba6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5153
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:04:14Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-b3b1d8900aff4be392b419ab90716ba62022-12-22T03:07:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532018-12-011210.3389/fnbeh.2018.00297427040Regulating Craving by Anticipating Positive and Negative Outcomes: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis and Network Connectivity ApproachJohann D. Kruschwitz0Johann D. Kruschwitz1Vera U. Ludwig2Vera U. Ludwig3Vera U. Ludwig4Lea Waller5Lea Waller6David List7David List8David Wisniewski9Uta Wolfensteller10Uta Wolfensteller11Thomas Goschke12Thomas Goschke13Henrik Walter14Division of Mind and Brain Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyCollaborative Research Centre 940 “Volition and Cognitive Control”, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyDivision of Mind and Brain Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyMindfulness Center, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United StatesDivision of Mind and Brain Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyCollaborative Research Centre 940 “Volition and Cognitive Control”, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyDivision of Mind and Brain Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyCollaborative Research Centre 940 “Volition and Cognitive Control”, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumCollaborative Research Centre 940 “Volition and Cognitive Control”, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyFaculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyCollaborative Research Centre 940 “Volition and Cognitive Control”, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyFaculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyDivision of Mind and Brain Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, GermanyDuring self-control, we may resist short-term temptations in order to reach a favorable future (e.g., resisting cake to stay healthy). The neural basis of self-control is typically attributed to “cold,” unemotional cognitive control mechanisms which inhibit affect-related regions via the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Here, we investigate the neural underpinnings of regulating cravings by mentally evoking the positive consequences of resisting a temptation (e.g., being healthy) as opposed to evoking the negative consequences of giving in to a temptation (e.g., becoming overweight). It is conceivable that when using these types of strategies, regions associated with emotional processing [e.g., striatum, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)] are involved in addition to control-related prefrontal and parietal regions. Thirty-one participants saw pictures of unhealthy snacks in the fMRI scanner and, depending on the trial, regulated their craving by thinking of the positive consequences of resisting, or the negative consequences of not resisting. In a control condition, they anticipated the pleasure of eating and thus, allowed the craving to occur (now-condition). In line with previous studies, we found activation of a cognitive control network during self-regulation. In the negative future thinking condition, the insula was more active than in the positive condition, while there were no activations that were stronger in the positive (> negative) future thinking condition. However, additionally, multivariate pattern analysis showed that during craving regulation, information about the valence of anticipated emotions was present in the vmPFC, the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the insula. Moreover, a network including vmPFC and PCC showed higher connectivity during the positive (> negative) future thinking condition. Since these regions are often associated with affective processing, these findings suggest that “hot,” affective processes may, at least in certain circumstances, play a role in self-control.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00297/fullanticipated emotionsself-controlvolitionfuture thinkingfMRIself-regulation
spellingShingle Johann D. Kruschwitz
Johann D. Kruschwitz
Vera U. Ludwig
Vera U. Ludwig
Vera U. Ludwig
Lea Waller
Lea Waller
David List
David List
David Wisniewski
Uta Wolfensteller
Uta Wolfensteller
Thomas Goschke
Thomas Goschke
Henrik Walter
Regulating Craving by Anticipating Positive and Negative Outcomes: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis and Network Connectivity Approach
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
anticipated emotions
self-control
volition
future thinking
fMRI
self-regulation
title Regulating Craving by Anticipating Positive and Negative Outcomes: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis and Network Connectivity Approach
title_full Regulating Craving by Anticipating Positive and Negative Outcomes: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis and Network Connectivity Approach
title_fullStr Regulating Craving by Anticipating Positive and Negative Outcomes: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis and Network Connectivity Approach
title_full_unstemmed Regulating Craving by Anticipating Positive and Negative Outcomes: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis and Network Connectivity Approach
title_short Regulating Craving by Anticipating Positive and Negative Outcomes: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis and Network Connectivity Approach
title_sort regulating craving by anticipating positive and negative outcomes a multivariate pattern analysis and network connectivity approach
topic anticipated emotions
self-control
volition
future thinking
fMRI
self-regulation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00297/full
work_keys_str_mv AT johanndkruschwitz regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT johanndkruschwitz regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT verauludwig regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT verauludwig regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT verauludwig regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT leawaller regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT leawaller regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT davidlist regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT davidlist regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT davidwisniewski regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT utawolfensteller regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT utawolfensteller regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT thomasgoschke regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT thomasgoschke regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach
AT henrikwalter regulatingcravingbyanticipatingpositiveandnegativeoutcomesamultivariatepatternanalysisandnetworkconnectivityapproach