Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15N abundance and plasma urea concentration: A meta-analysis

The objective of this study was to test two candidate biomarkers of feed efficiency in growing cattle. A database was built using performance data from 13 trials conducted with growing heifers, steers and young bulls and testing 34 dietary treatments. Different breeds were used with Charolais (37%),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cantalapiedra-Hijar, Gonzalo, Morel, Isabelle, Sepchat, Bernard, Chantelauze, Céline, Miller, Gemma A., Duthie, Carol-Anne, Ortigues-Marty, Isabelle, Dewhurst, Richard J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peer Community In 2022-06-01
Series:Peer Community Journal
Online Access:https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.130/
_version_ 1797651123165724672
author Cantalapiedra-Hijar, Gonzalo
Morel, Isabelle
Sepchat, Bernard
Chantelauze, Céline
Miller, Gemma A.
Duthie, Carol-Anne
Ortigues-Marty, Isabelle
Dewhurst, Richard J.
author_facet Cantalapiedra-Hijar, Gonzalo
Morel, Isabelle
Sepchat, Bernard
Chantelauze, Céline
Miller, Gemma A.
Duthie, Carol-Anne
Ortigues-Marty, Isabelle
Dewhurst, Richard J.
author_sort Cantalapiedra-Hijar, Gonzalo
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this study was to test two candidate biomarkers of feed efficiency in growing cattle. A database was built using performance data from 13 trials conducted with growing heifers, steers and young bulls and testing 34 dietary treatments. Different breeds were used with Charolais (37%), Simmental (15%), and cross-bred (40%) cattle being the most numerous. The database included 759 individual records for animal performance and laboratory data for N isotopic discrimination measured in plasma or muscle (Δ15Nanimal-diet; n = 749) and plasma urea concentration (n = 659). Feed conversion efficiency (FCE) and residual feed intake (RFI) criteria were calculated for a duration ranging between 56 and 259 d, depending on the trial. For FCE prediction, mixed models included the random effects of study, treatment within-study and pen within-study (i.e. contemporary group; CG) allowing these effects to be progressively excluded from the relationship. For RFI prediction, simple linear regressions were tested with the CG effect removed from biomarker values before analysis. Better models were obtained with Δ15Nanimal-diet compared to plasma urea concentration, irrespective of using mean or individual values and regardless of the feed efficiency criterion. Prediction error (0.027 kg/kg) from mixed-effect models using mean FCE and Δ15Nanimal-diet values would allow discrimination of 2 dietary treatments or production conditions in terms of FCE if they differ by more than 0.10 kg/kg. The Δ15Nanimal-diet values showed a negative and significant (P<0.001) relationship with FCE at the individual level and results highlighted that it is possible to significantly discriminate two animals randomly selected from the same CG if they differ by at least 0.06 kg/kg FCE. In addition, the top 20% highest and lowest animals within-CG in terms of RFI and FCE (extreme animals) showed significant (P<0.001) differences in Δ15Nanimal-diet values, while only extreme FCE animals could be discriminated when using plasma urea concentrations (P=0.002). No gain in feed efficiency prediction was observed when combining candidate biomarkers. However, when average daily gain data was combined with Δ15Nanimal-diet, the prediction of FCE at the individual level was strengthened compared to using only one of them, in which case average daily gain was the best single predictor. Our findings confirm that Δ15Nanimal-diet may be useful to form groups of animals for precision feeding when feed intake and body weight gain are not available. Further studies are warranted, however, to evaluate the usefulness of this promising biomarker for genetic selection.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T16:11:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b3b62cc7f6b74338a9368be6eda59f4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2804-3871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T16:11:30Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Peer Community In
record_format Article
series Peer Community Journal
spelling doaj.art-b3b62cc7f6b74338a9368be6eda59f4b2023-10-24T14:38:35ZengPeer Community InPeer Community Journal2804-38712022-06-01210.24072/pcjournal.13010.24072/pcjournal.130Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15N abundance and plasma urea concentration: A meta-analysisCantalapiedra-Hijar, Gonzalo0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9486-8238Morel, Isabelle1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-3076Sepchat, Bernard2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9751-351XChantelauze, Céline3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-3348Miller, Gemma A.4Duthie, Carol-Anne5https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3020-9078Ortigues-Marty, Isabelle6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0399-013XDewhurst, Richard J.7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9357-7372INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, Vetagro Sup, UMRH, 63122 Saint-Genes-Champanelle, FranceAgroscope, Route de la Tioleyre 4, 1725 Posieux, SwitzerlandINRAE, UE Herbipôle, 63122 St Genès Champanelle, FranceINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, Vetagro Sup, UMRH, 63122 Saint-Genes-Champanelle, France; Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, UNH, Plateforme d’Exploration du Métabolisme, MetaboHUB, Clermont, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceSRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, United KingdomSRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, United KingdomINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, Vetagro Sup, UMRH, 63122 Saint-Genes-Champanelle, FranceSRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, United KingdomThe objective of this study was to test two candidate biomarkers of feed efficiency in growing cattle. A database was built using performance data from 13 trials conducted with growing heifers, steers and young bulls and testing 34 dietary treatments. Different breeds were used with Charolais (37%), Simmental (15%), and cross-bred (40%) cattle being the most numerous. The database included 759 individual records for animal performance and laboratory data for N isotopic discrimination measured in plasma or muscle (Δ15Nanimal-diet; n = 749) and plasma urea concentration (n = 659). Feed conversion efficiency (FCE) and residual feed intake (RFI) criteria were calculated for a duration ranging between 56 and 259 d, depending on the trial. For FCE prediction, mixed models included the random effects of study, treatment within-study and pen within-study (i.e. contemporary group; CG) allowing these effects to be progressively excluded from the relationship. For RFI prediction, simple linear regressions were tested with the CG effect removed from biomarker values before analysis. Better models were obtained with Δ15Nanimal-diet compared to plasma urea concentration, irrespective of using mean or individual values and regardless of the feed efficiency criterion. Prediction error (0.027 kg/kg) from mixed-effect models using mean FCE and Δ15Nanimal-diet values would allow discrimination of 2 dietary treatments or production conditions in terms of FCE if they differ by more than 0.10 kg/kg. The Δ15Nanimal-diet values showed a negative and significant (P<0.001) relationship with FCE at the individual level and results highlighted that it is possible to significantly discriminate two animals randomly selected from the same CG if they differ by at least 0.06 kg/kg FCE. In addition, the top 20% highest and lowest animals within-CG in terms of RFI and FCE (extreme animals) showed significant (P<0.001) differences in Δ15Nanimal-diet values, while only extreme FCE animals could be discriminated when using plasma urea concentrations (P=0.002). No gain in feed efficiency prediction was observed when combining candidate biomarkers. However, when average daily gain data was combined with Δ15Nanimal-diet, the prediction of FCE at the individual level was strengthened compared to using only one of them, in which case average daily gain was the best single predictor. Our findings confirm that Δ15Nanimal-diet may be useful to form groups of animals for precision feeding when feed intake and body weight gain are not available. Further studies are warranted, however, to evaluate the usefulness of this promising biomarker for genetic selection.https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.130/
spellingShingle Cantalapiedra-Hijar, Gonzalo
Morel, Isabelle
Sepchat, Bernard
Chantelauze, Céline
Miller, Gemma A.
Duthie, Carol-Anne
Ortigues-Marty, Isabelle
Dewhurst, Richard J.
Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15N abundance and plasma urea concentration: A meta-analysis
Peer Community Journal
title Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15N abundance and plasma urea concentration: A meta-analysis
title_full Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15N abundance and plasma urea concentration: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15N abundance and plasma urea concentration: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15N abundance and plasma urea concentration: A meta-analysis
title_short Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15N abundance and plasma urea concentration: A meta-analysis
title_sort identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15n abundance and plasma urea concentration a meta analysis
url https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.130/
work_keys_str_mv AT cantalapiedrahijargonzalo identifyingcattlewithsuperiorgrowthfeedefficiencythroughtheirnatural15nabundanceandplasmaureaconcentrationametaanalysis
AT morelisabelle identifyingcattlewithsuperiorgrowthfeedefficiencythroughtheirnatural15nabundanceandplasmaureaconcentrationametaanalysis
AT sepchatbernard identifyingcattlewithsuperiorgrowthfeedefficiencythroughtheirnatural15nabundanceandplasmaureaconcentrationametaanalysis
AT chantelauzeceline identifyingcattlewithsuperiorgrowthfeedefficiencythroughtheirnatural15nabundanceandplasmaureaconcentrationametaanalysis
AT millergemmaa identifyingcattlewithsuperiorgrowthfeedefficiencythroughtheirnatural15nabundanceandplasmaureaconcentrationametaanalysis
AT duthiecarolanne identifyingcattlewithsuperiorgrowthfeedefficiencythroughtheirnatural15nabundanceandplasmaureaconcentrationametaanalysis
AT ortiguesmartyisabelle identifyingcattlewithsuperiorgrowthfeedefficiencythroughtheirnatural15nabundanceandplasmaureaconcentrationametaanalysis
AT dewhurstrichardj identifyingcattlewithsuperiorgrowthfeedefficiencythroughtheirnatural15nabundanceandplasmaureaconcentrationametaanalysis