Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping review
IntroductionIn challenging listening situations, speech perception with a cochlear implant (CI) remains demanding and requires high levels of listening effort, which can lead to increased levels of listening-related fatigue. The body of literature on these topics increases as the number of CI users...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neurology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1278508/full |
_version_ | 1827773146952892416 |
---|---|
author | Cato Philips Cato Philips Laure Jacquemin Laure Jacquemin Marc J. W. Lammers Marc J. W. Lammers Griet Mertens Griet Mertens Annick Gilles Annick Gilles Annick Gilles Olivier M. Vanderveken Olivier M. Vanderveken Vincent Van Rompaey Vincent Van Rompaey |
author_facet | Cato Philips Cato Philips Laure Jacquemin Laure Jacquemin Marc J. W. Lammers Marc J. W. Lammers Griet Mertens Griet Mertens Annick Gilles Annick Gilles Annick Gilles Olivier M. Vanderveken Olivier M. Vanderveken Vincent Van Rompaey Vincent Van Rompaey |
author_sort | Cato Philips |
collection | DOAJ |
description | IntroductionIn challenging listening situations, speech perception with a cochlear implant (CI) remains demanding and requires high levels of listening effort, which can lead to increased levels of listening-related fatigue. The body of literature on these topics increases as the number of CI users rises. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the existing literature on listening effort, fatigue, and listening-related fatigue among CI users and the measurement techniques to evaluate them.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statements were used to conduct the scoping review. The search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify all relevant studies.ResultsIn total, 24 studies were included and suggests that CI users experience higher levels of listening effort when compared to normal hearing controls using scales, questionnaires and electroencephalogram measurements. However, executing dual-task paradigms did not reveal any difference in listening effort between both groups. Uncertainty exists regarding the difference in listening effort between unilateral, bilateral, and bimodal CI users with bilateral hearing loss due to ambiguous results. Only five studies were eligible for the research on fatigue and listening-related fatigue. Additionally, studies using objective measurement methods were lacking.DiscussionThis scoping review highlights the necessity for additional research on these topics. Moreover, there is a need for guidelines on how listening effort, fatigue, and listening-related fatigue should be measured to allow for study results that are comparable and support optimal rehabilitation strategies. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T13:18:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b3c9d6ae497949a3b0377356942aa376 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-2295 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T13:18:52Z |
publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Neurology |
spelling | doaj.art-b3c9d6ae497949a3b0377356942aa3762023-11-03T10:58:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952023-11-011410.3389/fneur.2023.12785081278508Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping reviewCato Philips0Cato Philips1Laure Jacquemin2Laure Jacquemin3Marc J. W. Lammers4Marc J. W. Lammers5Griet Mertens6Griet Mertens7Annick Gilles8Annick Gilles9Annick Gilles10Olivier M. Vanderveken11Olivier M. Vanderveken12Vincent Van Rompaey13Vincent Van Rompaey14Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, BelgiumExperimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, BelgiumExperimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, BelgiumExperimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, BelgiumExperimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent, Ghent, BelgiumExperimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, BelgiumExperimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, BelgiumIntroductionIn challenging listening situations, speech perception with a cochlear implant (CI) remains demanding and requires high levels of listening effort, which can lead to increased levels of listening-related fatigue. The body of literature on these topics increases as the number of CI users rises. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the existing literature on listening effort, fatigue, and listening-related fatigue among CI users and the measurement techniques to evaluate them.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statements were used to conduct the scoping review. The search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify all relevant studies.ResultsIn total, 24 studies were included and suggests that CI users experience higher levels of listening effort when compared to normal hearing controls using scales, questionnaires and electroencephalogram measurements. However, executing dual-task paradigms did not reveal any difference in listening effort between both groups. Uncertainty exists regarding the difference in listening effort between unilateral, bilateral, and bimodal CI users with bilateral hearing loss due to ambiguous results. Only five studies were eligible for the research on fatigue and listening-related fatigue. Additionally, studies using objective measurement methods were lacking.DiscussionThis scoping review highlights the necessity for additional research on these topics. Moreover, there is a need for guidelines on how listening effort, fatigue, and listening-related fatigue should be measured to allow for study results that are comparable and support optimal rehabilitation strategies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1278508/fullcochlear implantationlistening effortfatiguelistening-related fatiguescoping reviewbilateral hearing loss |
spellingShingle | Cato Philips Cato Philips Laure Jacquemin Laure Jacquemin Marc J. W. Lammers Marc J. W. Lammers Griet Mertens Griet Mertens Annick Gilles Annick Gilles Annick Gilles Olivier M. Vanderveken Olivier M. Vanderveken Vincent Van Rompaey Vincent Van Rompaey Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping review Frontiers in Neurology cochlear implantation listening effort fatigue listening-related fatigue scoping review bilateral hearing loss |
title | Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping review |
title_full | Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping review |
title_short | Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping review |
title_sort | listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users a scoping review |
topic | cochlear implantation listening effort fatigue listening-related fatigue scoping review bilateral hearing loss |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1278508/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT catophilips listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT catophilips listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT laurejacquemin listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT laurejacquemin listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT marcjwlammers listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT marcjwlammers listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT grietmertens listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT grietmertens listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT annickgilles listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT annickgilles listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT annickgilles listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT oliviermvanderveken listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT oliviermvanderveken listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT vincentvanrompaey listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview AT vincentvanrompaey listeningeffortandfatigueamongcochlearimplantusersascopingreview |