No time to die: Comparative study on preservation protocols for anaerobic fungi

Anaerobic fungi (AF, phylum Neocallimastigomycota) are best known for their ability to anaerobically degrade recalcitrant lignocellulosic biomass through mechanic and enzymatic means. While their biotechnological potential is well-recognized, applied research on AF is still hampered by the time-cons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Vinzelj, Akshay Joshi, Diana Young, Ljubica Begovic, Nico Peer, Lona Mosberger, Katharina Cécile Schmid Luedi, Heribert Insam, Veronika Flad, Magdalena Nagler, Sabine Marie Podmirseg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.978028/full
_version_ 1798001288800108544
author Julia Vinzelj
Akshay Joshi
Akshay Joshi
Diana Young
Ljubica Begovic
Nico Peer
Lona Mosberger
Katharina Cécile Schmid Luedi
Heribert Insam
Veronika Flad
Magdalena Nagler
Sabine Marie Podmirseg
author_facet Julia Vinzelj
Akshay Joshi
Akshay Joshi
Diana Young
Ljubica Begovic
Nico Peer
Lona Mosberger
Katharina Cécile Schmid Luedi
Heribert Insam
Veronika Flad
Magdalena Nagler
Sabine Marie Podmirseg
author_sort Julia Vinzelj
collection DOAJ
description Anaerobic fungi (AF, phylum Neocallimastigomycota) are best known for their ability to anaerobically degrade recalcitrant lignocellulosic biomass through mechanic and enzymatic means. While their biotechnological potential is well-recognized, applied research on AF is still hampered by the time-consuming and cost-intensive laboratory routines required to isolate, maintain, and preserve AF cultures. Reliable long-term preservation of specific AF strains would aid basic as well as applied research, but commonly used laboratory protocols for AF preservation can show erratic survival rates and usually exhibit only moderate resuscitation success for up to one or two years after preservation. To address both, the variability, and the preservation issues, we have set up a cross-laboratory, year-long study. We tested five different protocols for the preservation of AF. The experiments were performed at three different laboratories (Austria, Germany, Switzerland) with the same three morphologically distinct AF isolates (Anaeromyces mucronatus, Caeocmyces sp., and Neocallimastix cameroonii) living in stable co-culture with their naturally occurring, syntrophic methanogens. We could show that handling greatly contributes to the variability of results, especially in Anaeromyces mucronatus. Cryopreservation of (mature) biomass in liquid nitrogen had the highest overall survival rates (85–100%, depending on the strain and laboratory). Additionally, preservation on agar at 39°C had surprisingly high survival rates for up to 9 months, if pieces of agar containing mature AF thalli were resuscitated. This low-cost, low-effort method could replace consecutive batch cultivation for periods of up to 6 months, while long-term preservation is best done by cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen. Regardless of the method, however, preserving several replicates (>three) of the same strain is highly advisable.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:33:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b3d924ea67704050af4b1ca10e529a95
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-302X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:33:49Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-b3d924ea67704050af4b1ca10e529a952022-12-22T04:26:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2022-09-011310.3389/fmicb.2022.978028978028No time to die: Comparative study on preservation protocols for anaerobic fungiJulia Vinzelj0Akshay Joshi1Akshay Joshi2Diana Young3Ljubica Begovic4Nico Peer5Lona Mosberger6Katharina Cécile Schmid Luedi7Heribert Insam8Veronika Flad9Magdalena Nagler10Sabine Marie Podmirseg11Department of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaInstitute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Biocatalysis and Process Technology Unit, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wäedenswil, SwitzerlandMicro- and Molecular Biology, Central Department for Quality Assurance and Analytics, Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Freising, GermanyDepartment of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaInstitute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Biocatalysis and Process Technology Unit, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wäedenswil, SwitzerlandInstitute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Biocatalysis and Process Technology Unit, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wäedenswil, SwitzerlandDepartment of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaMicro- and Molecular Biology, Central Department for Quality Assurance and Analytics, Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Freising, GermanyDepartment of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaAnaerobic fungi (AF, phylum Neocallimastigomycota) are best known for their ability to anaerobically degrade recalcitrant lignocellulosic biomass through mechanic and enzymatic means. While their biotechnological potential is well-recognized, applied research on AF is still hampered by the time-consuming and cost-intensive laboratory routines required to isolate, maintain, and preserve AF cultures. Reliable long-term preservation of specific AF strains would aid basic as well as applied research, but commonly used laboratory protocols for AF preservation can show erratic survival rates and usually exhibit only moderate resuscitation success for up to one or two years after preservation. To address both, the variability, and the preservation issues, we have set up a cross-laboratory, year-long study. We tested five different protocols for the preservation of AF. The experiments were performed at three different laboratories (Austria, Germany, Switzerland) with the same three morphologically distinct AF isolates (Anaeromyces mucronatus, Caeocmyces sp., and Neocallimastix cameroonii) living in stable co-culture with their naturally occurring, syntrophic methanogens. We could show that handling greatly contributes to the variability of results, especially in Anaeromyces mucronatus. Cryopreservation of (mature) biomass in liquid nitrogen had the highest overall survival rates (85–100%, depending on the strain and laboratory). Additionally, preservation on agar at 39°C had surprisingly high survival rates for up to 9 months, if pieces of agar containing mature AF thalli were resuscitated. This low-cost, low-effort method could replace consecutive batch cultivation for periods of up to 6 months, while long-term preservation is best done by cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen. Regardless of the method, however, preserving several replicates (>three) of the same strain is highly advisable.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.978028/fullNeocallimastigomycotacryopreservationanaerobic fungilong-term storageshort-term storagepreservation techniques
spellingShingle Julia Vinzelj
Akshay Joshi
Akshay Joshi
Diana Young
Ljubica Begovic
Nico Peer
Lona Mosberger
Katharina Cécile Schmid Luedi
Heribert Insam
Veronika Flad
Magdalena Nagler
Sabine Marie Podmirseg
No time to die: Comparative study on preservation protocols for anaerobic fungi
Frontiers in Microbiology
Neocallimastigomycota
cryopreservation
anaerobic fungi
long-term storage
short-term storage
preservation techniques
title No time to die: Comparative study on preservation protocols for anaerobic fungi
title_full No time to die: Comparative study on preservation protocols for anaerobic fungi
title_fullStr No time to die: Comparative study on preservation protocols for anaerobic fungi
title_full_unstemmed No time to die: Comparative study on preservation protocols for anaerobic fungi
title_short No time to die: Comparative study on preservation protocols for anaerobic fungi
title_sort no time to die comparative study on preservation protocols for anaerobic fungi
topic Neocallimastigomycota
cryopreservation
anaerobic fungi
long-term storage
short-term storage
preservation techniques
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.978028/full
work_keys_str_mv AT juliavinzelj notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT akshayjoshi notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT akshayjoshi notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT dianayoung notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT ljubicabegovic notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT nicopeer notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT lonamosberger notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT katharinacecileschmidluedi notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT heribertinsam notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT veronikaflad notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT magdalenanagler notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi
AT sabinemariepodmirseg notimetodiecomparativestudyonpreservationprotocolsforanaerobicfungi