Quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance

The mathematical model presented in (Kulikov et al. 2018) can be used for the quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance. This requires the warm-up process of an implosion nuclear explosive device (NED) with a different structure to be analyzed with respect to various heat rem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evgeny G. Kulikov, Gennady G. Kulikov, Vladimir A. Apse, Anatoly N. Shmelev, Nikolay I. Geraskin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI) 2018-12-01
Series:Nuclear Energy and Technology
Online Access:https://nucet.pensoft.net/article/31859/download/pdf/
_version_ 1811296460439814144
author Evgeny G. Kulikov
Gennady G. Kulikov
Vladimir A. Apse
Anatoly N. Shmelev
Nikolay I. Geraskin
author_facet Evgeny G. Kulikov
Gennady G. Kulikov
Vladimir A. Apse
Anatoly N. Shmelev
Nikolay I. Geraskin
author_sort Evgeny G. Kulikov
collection DOAJ
description The mathematical model presented in (Kulikov et al. 2018) can be used for the quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance. This requires the warm-up process of an implosion nuclear explosive device (NED) with a different structure to be analyzed with respect to various heat removal conditions and the option to be identified in which the NED remains operational for the longest time possible. The fraction of the 238Pu isotope with which, even in this case, the NED will prove to be operational only for quite a short time can be regarded as sufficient for the plutonium with such composition to be considered a proliferation resistant material. The purpose of the paper is to evaluate in quantitative terms the content of 238Pu in plutonium for ensuring its proliferation resistance and to identify the factors which influence significantly this evaluation. The data, procedures and findings from earlier works on the topic, as well as the authors’ own estimates and calculations were used for the study. It has been shown that the important factors involved in the plutonium proliferation resistance evaluation are the NED technology level and the required NED lifetime. Depending on the required lifetime, tougher requirements can be introduced with respect to the 238Pu content both from the standpoint of low-technology and high-technology NEDs. With a lifetime of five hours taken as the guide-mark (a NED is unlikely to be finally assembled, transported and used for such a short time), it is only plutonium containing 55% of 238Pu that can be considered a proliferation resistant fissile material.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:48:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b3db6609a8a54070a977bb86e414f2e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2452-3038
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:48:45Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI)
record_format Article
series Nuclear Energy and Technology
spelling doaj.art-b3db6609a8a54070a977bb86e414f2e12022-12-22T02:59:52ZengNational Research Nuclear University (MEPhI)Nuclear Energy and Technology2452-30382018-12-014319119510.3897/nucet.4.3185931859Quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistanceEvgeny G. Kulikov0Gennady G. Kulikov1Vladimir A. Apse2Anatoly N. Shmelev3Nikolay I. Geraskin4National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)The mathematical model presented in (Kulikov et al. 2018) can be used for the quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance. This requires the warm-up process of an implosion nuclear explosive device (NED) with a different structure to be analyzed with respect to various heat removal conditions and the option to be identified in which the NED remains operational for the longest time possible. The fraction of the 238Pu isotope with which, even in this case, the NED will prove to be operational only for quite a short time can be regarded as sufficient for the plutonium with such composition to be considered a proliferation resistant material. The purpose of the paper is to evaluate in quantitative terms the content of 238Pu in plutonium for ensuring its proliferation resistance and to identify the factors which influence significantly this evaluation. The data, procedures and findings from earlier works on the topic, as well as the authors’ own estimates and calculations were used for the study. It has been shown that the important factors involved in the plutonium proliferation resistance evaluation are the NED technology level and the required NED lifetime. Depending on the required lifetime, tougher requirements can be introduced with respect to the 238Pu content both from the standpoint of low-technology and high-technology NEDs. With a lifetime of five hours taken as the guide-mark (a NED is unlikely to be finally assembled, transported and used for such a short time), it is only plutonium containing 55% of 238Pu that can be considered a proliferation resistant fissile material.https://nucet.pensoft.net/article/31859/download/pdf/
spellingShingle Evgeny G. Kulikov
Gennady G. Kulikov
Vladimir A. Apse
Anatoly N. Shmelev
Nikolay I. Geraskin
Quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance
Nuclear Energy and Technology
title Quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance
title_full Quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance
title_fullStr Quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance
title_short Quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance
title_sort quantitative evaluation of the plutonium proliferation resistance
url https://nucet.pensoft.net/article/31859/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT evgenygkulikov quantitativeevaluationoftheplutoniumproliferationresistance
AT gennadygkulikov quantitativeevaluationoftheplutoniumproliferationresistance
AT vladimiraapse quantitativeevaluationoftheplutoniumproliferationresistance
AT anatolynshmelev quantitativeevaluationoftheplutoniumproliferationresistance
AT nikolayigeraskin quantitativeevaluationoftheplutoniumproliferationresistance