Simple imputation methods were inadequate for missing not at random (MNAR) quality of life data
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Objective</p> <p>QoL data were routinely collected in a randomised controlled trial (RCT), which employed a reminder system, retrieving about 50% of data originally missing. The objective was to use this unique feature to evaluate possible missingness...
Main Authors: | Fayers Peter M, Fielding Shona, McDonald Alison, McPherson Gladys, Campbell Marion K |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2008-08-01
|
Series: | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
Online Access: | http://www.hqlo.com/content/6/1/57 |
Similar Items
-
Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors
by: Jacques-Emmanuel Galimard, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Multiple Imputation for Dichotomous MNAR Items Using Recursive Structural Equation Modeling With Rasch Measures as Predictors
by: Celeste Combrinck, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01) -
Investigating the missing data mechanism in quality of life outcomes: a comparison of approaches
by: Fayers Peter M, et al.
Published: (2009-06-01) -
Comparison of Different LGM-Based Methods with MAR and MNAR Dropout Data
by: Meijuan Li, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01) -
Imputation of missing network data: Some simple procedures
by: Mark Huisman
Published: (2009-12-01)