The Authenticity of Myriad Things in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>

A large quantity of past research in philosophical Daoism has been dedicated to the authenticity of &#8220;<i>dao</i>&#8222;; this essay shifts the focus to the authenticity of the &#8220;myriad things 萬物 (<i>wanwu</i>)&#8222; in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chiayu Hsu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/3/218
_version_ 1818179266807857152
author Chiayu Hsu
author_facet Chiayu Hsu
author_sort Chiayu Hsu
collection DOAJ
description A large quantity of past research in philosophical Daoism has been dedicated to the authenticity of &#8220;<i>dao</i>&#8222;; this essay shifts the focus to the authenticity of the &#8220;myriad things 萬物 (<i>wanwu</i>)&#8222; in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>. The concept of &#8220;myriad things&#8222;, which later gains paradigmatic importance in Chinese philosophy, was first introduced in the <i>Laozi</i> and developed in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>. Under the collective heading of &#8220;myriad&#8222;, &#8220;myriad things&#8222; encompasses all of the variegated existing entities in the empirical world, while also taking into account the individual particularities of each entity without calling forth any singular or set of qualities, or &#8220;essence&#8222;, that is shared by all individuals. As a concept that safeguards individual particularities, the use of &#8220;myriad things&#8222; in the <i>Zhuangzi</i> serves to counterargue against the essentialist tendency to treat &#8220;humans 人 (<i>ren</i>)&#8222; as a collective of moral agents with a singular and identifiable moral essence. By the same token, Daoist thinkers re-interpret the meaning of &#8220;heaven 天 (<i>tian</i>)&#8222; with &#8220;the collective name of the myriad things 萬物之總名&#8222;, thus transferring the transcendent meaning belonging to the former as a transcendent moral authority to the myriad variegated principles that are inherent to each existing and transforming individual. The Daoist theoretical frame breaks away from that of &#8220;heaven&#8211;human&#8222; and connects the re-interpreted &#8220;heaven&#8222; with concepts of &#8220;self-so/self-affirm 自然 (<i>ziran</i>)&#8222;, &#8220;essentials 情 (<i>qing</i>)&#8222;, &#8220;nature 性 (<i>xing</i>)&#8222;, and &#8220;potency 德 (<i>de</i>)&#8222;. In this respect, &#8220;authenticity 真 (<i>zhen</i>)&#8222;, as it is warranted by &#8220;non-action 無為 (<i>wuwei</i>)&#8222;, is proposed as an ultimate state of attainment that is identified with the self-realization of each individual being as herself, over and above the so-called moral goodness and its opposite. Furthermore, the self-realization of the authenticity of the myriad things is seemingly paradoxical in the sense that, from the perspective of the &#8220;transformation of the myriad things 萬物之化&#8222;, the separation between object and subject both exists and is non-existent. The proposition of &#8220;myriad things&#8222; opposes the essentialization of human beings, whereas the doctrine of the transformation of the myriad things opposes the belief in fixed essentials in individual entities. The road to realizing &#8220;authenticity&#8222; as herself is thus a never-ending process for each individual member of the myriad things.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:01:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b3f7eeabfc854276bdce0e44c34f55ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:01:09Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-b3f7eeabfc854276bdce0e44c34f55ef2022-12-22T00:50:59ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442019-03-0110321810.3390/rel10030218rel10030218The Authenticity of Myriad Things in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>Chiayu Hsu0Department of Philosophy, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaA large quantity of past research in philosophical Daoism has been dedicated to the authenticity of &#8220;<i>dao</i>&#8222;; this essay shifts the focus to the authenticity of the &#8220;myriad things 萬物 (<i>wanwu</i>)&#8222; in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>. The concept of &#8220;myriad things&#8222;, which later gains paradigmatic importance in Chinese philosophy, was first introduced in the <i>Laozi</i> and developed in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>. Under the collective heading of &#8220;myriad&#8222;, &#8220;myriad things&#8222; encompasses all of the variegated existing entities in the empirical world, while also taking into account the individual particularities of each entity without calling forth any singular or set of qualities, or &#8220;essence&#8222;, that is shared by all individuals. As a concept that safeguards individual particularities, the use of &#8220;myriad things&#8222; in the <i>Zhuangzi</i> serves to counterargue against the essentialist tendency to treat &#8220;humans 人 (<i>ren</i>)&#8222; as a collective of moral agents with a singular and identifiable moral essence. By the same token, Daoist thinkers re-interpret the meaning of &#8220;heaven 天 (<i>tian</i>)&#8222; with &#8220;the collective name of the myriad things 萬物之總名&#8222;, thus transferring the transcendent meaning belonging to the former as a transcendent moral authority to the myriad variegated principles that are inherent to each existing and transforming individual. The Daoist theoretical frame breaks away from that of &#8220;heaven&#8211;human&#8222; and connects the re-interpreted &#8220;heaven&#8222; with concepts of &#8220;self-so/self-affirm 自然 (<i>ziran</i>)&#8222;, &#8220;essentials 情 (<i>qing</i>)&#8222;, &#8220;nature 性 (<i>xing</i>)&#8222;, and &#8220;potency 德 (<i>de</i>)&#8222;. In this respect, &#8220;authenticity 真 (<i>zhen</i>)&#8222;, as it is warranted by &#8220;non-action 無為 (<i>wuwei</i>)&#8222;, is proposed as an ultimate state of attainment that is identified with the self-realization of each individual being as herself, over and above the so-called moral goodness and its opposite. Furthermore, the self-realization of the authenticity of the myriad things is seemingly paradoxical in the sense that, from the perspective of the &#8220;transformation of the myriad things 萬物之化&#8222;, the separation between object and subject both exists and is non-existent. The proposition of &#8220;myriad things&#8222; opposes the essentialization of human beings, whereas the doctrine of the transformation of the myriad things opposes the belief in fixed essentials in individual entities. The road to realizing &#8220;authenticity&#8222; as herself is thus a never-ending process for each individual member of the myriad things.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/3/218myriad thingsessentialstransformation<i>ziran</i>natureheaven
spellingShingle Chiayu Hsu
The Authenticity of Myriad Things in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>
Religions
myriad things
essentials
transformation
<i>ziran</i>
nature
heaven
title The Authenticity of Myriad Things in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>
title_full The Authenticity of Myriad Things in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>
title_fullStr The Authenticity of Myriad Things in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>
title_full_unstemmed The Authenticity of Myriad Things in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>
title_short The Authenticity of Myriad Things in the <i>Zhuangzi</i>
title_sort authenticity of myriad things in the i zhuangzi i
topic myriad things
essentials
transformation
<i>ziran</i>
nature
heaven
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/3/218
work_keys_str_mv AT chiayuhsu theauthenticityofmyriadthingsintheizhuangzii
AT chiayuhsu authenticityofmyriadthingsintheizhuangzii