Neural Basis of Two Kinds of Social Influence: Obedience and Conformity

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used in this study to explore the neural mechanism of obedience and conformity on the model of online book purchasing. Participants were asked to decide as quickly as possible whether to buy a book based on limited information including its title, keywords and nu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying eXie, Mingliang eChen, Hongxia eLai, Wuke eZhang, Zhen eZhao, Ch. Mahmood eAnwar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00051/full
_version_ 1818264408075272192
author Ying eXie
Mingliang eChen
Hongxia eLai
Wuke eZhang
Zhen eZhao
Ch. Mahmood eAnwar
author_facet Ying eXie
Mingliang eChen
Hongxia eLai
Wuke eZhang
Zhen eZhao
Ch. Mahmood eAnwar
author_sort Ying eXie
collection DOAJ
description Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used in this study to explore the neural mechanism of obedience and conformity on the model of online book purchasing. Participants were asked to decide as quickly as possible whether to buy a book based on limited information including its title, keywords and number of positive and negative reviews. Obedience was induced by forcing participants to buy books which received mostly negative reviews. In contrast, conformity was aroused by majority influence (caused by positive and negative comments). P3 and N2, two kinds of ERP components related to social cognitive process, were measured and recorded with electroencephalogram (EEG) test. The results show that compared with conformity decisions, obedience decisions induced greater cognitive conflicts. In ERP measurements, greater amplitudes of N2 component were observed in the context of obedience. However, consistency level did not make a difference on P3 peak latency for both conformity and obedience. This shows that classification process is implicit in both conformity and obedience decision-making. In addition, for both conformity and obedience decisions, augmented P3 was observed when the reviews consistency (either negative or positive) was higher.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T19:34:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b3ff1f6bc334480db809d21accf6f429
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T19:34:26Z
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-b3ff1f6bc334480db809d21accf6f4292022-12-22T00:14:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612016-02-011010.3389/fnhum.2016.00051177399Neural Basis of Two Kinds of Social Influence: Obedience and ConformityYing eXie0Mingliang eChen1Hongxia eLai2Wuke eZhang3Zhen eZhao4Ch. Mahmood eAnwar5School of Management, Zhejiang UniversitySchool of Management, Zhejiang UniversitySchool of Management, Zhejiang UniversitySchool of Management, Zhejiang UniversitySchool of Management, Zhejiang UniversityScholars IndexEvent-related potentials (ERPs) were used in this study to explore the neural mechanism of obedience and conformity on the model of online book purchasing. Participants were asked to decide as quickly as possible whether to buy a book based on limited information including its title, keywords and number of positive and negative reviews. Obedience was induced by forcing participants to buy books which received mostly negative reviews. In contrast, conformity was aroused by majority influence (caused by positive and negative comments). P3 and N2, two kinds of ERP components related to social cognitive process, were measured and recorded with electroencephalogram (EEG) test. The results show that compared with conformity decisions, obedience decisions induced greater cognitive conflicts. In ERP measurements, greater amplitudes of N2 component were observed in the context of obedience. However, consistency level did not make a difference on P3 peak latency for both conformity and obedience. This shows that classification process is implicit in both conformity and obedience decision-making. In addition, for both conformity and obedience decisions, augmented P3 was observed when the reviews consistency (either negative or positive) was higher.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00051/fullEvent-related potentialssocial influenceconformityObedienceNEURAL BASIS
spellingShingle Ying eXie
Mingliang eChen
Hongxia eLai
Wuke eZhang
Zhen eZhao
Ch. Mahmood eAnwar
Neural Basis of Two Kinds of Social Influence: Obedience and Conformity
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Event-related potentials
social influence
conformity
Obedience
NEURAL BASIS
title Neural Basis of Two Kinds of Social Influence: Obedience and Conformity
title_full Neural Basis of Two Kinds of Social Influence: Obedience and Conformity
title_fullStr Neural Basis of Two Kinds of Social Influence: Obedience and Conformity
title_full_unstemmed Neural Basis of Two Kinds of Social Influence: Obedience and Conformity
title_short Neural Basis of Two Kinds of Social Influence: Obedience and Conformity
title_sort neural basis of two kinds of social influence obedience and conformity
topic Event-related potentials
social influence
conformity
Obedience
NEURAL BASIS
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00051/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yingexie neuralbasisoftwokindsofsocialinfluenceobedienceandconformity
AT mingliangechen neuralbasisoftwokindsofsocialinfluenceobedienceandconformity
AT hongxiaelai neuralbasisoftwokindsofsocialinfluenceobedienceandconformity
AT wukeezhang neuralbasisoftwokindsofsocialinfluenceobedienceandconformity
AT zhenezhao neuralbasisoftwokindsofsocialinfluenceobedienceandconformity
AT chmahmoodeanwar neuralbasisoftwokindsofsocialinfluenceobedienceandconformity