Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Available Methods in Helicobacter Pylori Infection Detection in Children

Background: Helicobacter pylori infection is common in children. It results in a series of diseases such as peptic ulcer, iron deficiency anemia, reduced growth, and gastrointestinal malignancies. Every test to detect H. pylori has particular limitations. Moreover, various noninvasive methods have d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hosein Saneian, Hamid Rahimi, Nafiseh Sadat Mahmoodi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2012-12-01
Series:مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
Online Access:http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/2160
_version_ 1797728362572021760
author Hosein Saneian
Hamid Rahimi
Nafiseh Sadat Mahmoodi
author_facet Hosein Saneian
Hamid Rahimi
Nafiseh Sadat Mahmoodi
author_sort Hosein Saneian
collection DOAJ
description Background: Helicobacter pylori infection is common in children. It results in a series of diseases such as peptic ulcer, iron deficiency anemia, reduced growth, and gastrointestinal malignancies. Every test to detect H. pylori has particular limitations. Moreover, various noninvasive methods have different sensitivity and specificity. We investigated the sensitivity of available diagnostic methods to identify the best noninvasive method for detection of H. pylori. Methods: During a one-year period, 99 children who presented at Alzahra Hospital (Isfahan, Iran) with epigastric tenderness, abdominal pain at night, and early satiety were examined. They all underwent endoscopy and rapid urease and serologic tests. Stool samples were also obtained to detect H. pylori antigen. Culture was considered as the gold standard in diagnosis of H. pylori infection. The last step was the statistical analysis of the collected data. Findings: According to culture results, 33% of the patients were positive for H. pylori infection. The sensitivity and specificity of urease test were 61.3% and 86.6%, respectively. The corresponding values were 74.1% and 98.3% for serological tests and 74.1% and 96.7% for H. pylori antigen detection in stool. Conclusion: We found endoscopy to be the best method of H. pylori detection. Examining stool samples for the presence of H. pylori antigen and rapid urease test were the second and third methods in our ranking. Keywords: Rapid urease test, Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool, Serologic test, Culture
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:12:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b400d418ae3c49afa4eb2314825adeaf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-7595
1735-854X
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:12:53Z
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
spelling doaj.art-b400d418ae3c49afa4eb2314825adeaf2023-09-02T02:30:59ZfasIsfahan University of Medical Sciencesمجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان1027-75951735-854X2012-12-0130212183918441193Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Available Methods in Helicobacter Pylori Infection Detection in ChildrenHosein Saneian0Hamid Rahimi1Nafiseh Sadat Mahmoodi2Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric, School of Medicine AND Child Growth and Development Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssistant Professor, Department of Pediatric, School of Medicine AND Child Growth and Development Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranStudent of Medicine, School of Medicine AND Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranBackground: Helicobacter pylori infection is common in children. It results in a series of diseases such as peptic ulcer, iron deficiency anemia, reduced growth, and gastrointestinal malignancies. Every test to detect H. pylori has particular limitations. Moreover, various noninvasive methods have different sensitivity and specificity. We investigated the sensitivity of available diagnostic methods to identify the best noninvasive method for detection of H. pylori. Methods: During a one-year period, 99 children who presented at Alzahra Hospital (Isfahan, Iran) with epigastric tenderness, abdominal pain at night, and early satiety were examined. They all underwent endoscopy and rapid urease and serologic tests. Stool samples were also obtained to detect H. pylori antigen. Culture was considered as the gold standard in diagnosis of H. pylori infection. The last step was the statistical analysis of the collected data. Findings: According to culture results, 33% of the patients were positive for H. pylori infection. The sensitivity and specificity of urease test were 61.3% and 86.6%, respectively. The corresponding values were 74.1% and 98.3% for serological tests and 74.1% and 96.7% for H. pylori antigen detection in stool. Conclusion: We found endoscopy to be the best method of H. pylori detection. Examining stool samples for the presence of H. pylori antigen and rapid urease test were the second and third methods in our ranking. Keywords: Rapid urease test, Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool, Serologic test, Culturehttp://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/2160
spellingShingle Hosein Saneian
Hamid Rahimi
Nafiseh Sadat Mahmoodi
Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Available Methods in Helicobacter Pylori Infection Detection in Children
مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
title Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Available Methods in Helicobacter Pylori Infection Detection in Children
title_full Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Available Methods in Helicobacter Pylori Infection Detection in Children
title_fullStr Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Available Methods in Helicobacter Pylori Infection Detection in Children
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Available Methods in Helicobacter Pylori Infection Detection in Children
title_short Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Available Methods in Helicobacter Pylori Infection Detection in Children
title_sort comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of available methods in helicobacter pylori infection detection in children
url http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/2160
work_keys_str_mv AT hoseinsaneian comparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofavailablemethodsinhelicobacterpyloriinfectiondetectioninchildren
AT hamidrahimi comparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofavailablemethodsinhelicobacterpyloriinfectiondetectioninchildren
AT nafisehsadatmahmoodi comparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofavailablemethodsinhelicobacterpyloriinfectiondetectioninchildren