Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Study

Introduction: Probability of bond failure at sub-gingival cavosurface margin is high in class II cavity designs especially when margins are located in cementum or dentin. Previous researches have proved ultrasonics to be a beneficial tool in improving the marginal adaptation of the restorative ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hitesh Chandar Gyanani, Naveen Chhabra, Nimisha Chinmay Shah, Pratik Subash Jais
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2016-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/7479/18120_CE(EK)_F(AK)_PF1(EKAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf
_version_ 1818414738922536960
author Hitesh Chandar Gyanani
Naveen Chhabra
Nimisha Chinmay Shah
Pratik Subash Jais
author_facet Hitesh Chandar Gyanani
Naveen Chhabra
Nimisha Chinmay Shah
Pratik Subash Jais
author_sort Hitesh Chandar Gyanani
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Probability of bond failure at sub-gingival cavosurface margin is high in class II cavity designs especially when margins are located in cementum or dentin. Previous researches have proved ultrasonics to be a beneficial tool in improving the marginal adaptation of the restorative material. Therefore, the effect of ultrasonic activation of the lining material at the gingival cavosurface margin was tested in the present research. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the cervical micro-leakage in class II preparations with gingival margin located below cemento enamel junction and restored using open sandwich technique using two different liners and supplemented with or without ultrasonic agitation. Materials and Methods: Forty recently extracted human molars were collected, disinfected and stored in 0.9% saline solution. Standar dized class II cavities were prepared with gingival margin located 1mm below the cemento-enamel junction. Teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n=10) and restored using open sandwich technique as follows - Group A: Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement as liner and Beautifil II as coronal restoration; Group B: Same as group A supplemented with ultrasonic agitation; Group C: Beautifil Flow Plus as liner and Beautifil II as coronal restoration; Group D: Same as Group C supplemented with ultrasonic agitation. Prepared samples were subjected to thermo cycling, followed by immersing in 0.5% methylene blue dye solution. After 24 hours they were cleaned and sectioned in mesio-distal direction using diamond disc and evaluated for microleakage. Obtained scores were statistically analysed using one way ANOVA test and Post Hoc test. Results: Group B showed least microleakage amongst all groups but the results were statistically insignificant (p value > 0.05). Conclusion: Marginal adaptation of liner with ultrasonic activation was somewhat better however, the results were statistically insignificant.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T11:23:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b402461e2e1a433e890e642b40e50b98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T11:23:53Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-b402461e2e1a433e890e642b40e50b982022-12-21T23:03:38ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2016-03-01103ZC70ZC7310.7860/JCDR/2016/18120.7479Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro StudyHitesh Chandar Gyanani0Naveen Chhabra1Nimisha Chinmay Shah2Pratik Subash Jais3Post Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, K.M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, India.Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, K.M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, India.Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, K.M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, India.Post Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, K.M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, India.Introduction: Probability of bond failure at sub-gingival cavosurface margin is high in class II cavity designs especially when margins are located in cementum or dentin. Previous researches have proved ultrasonics to be a beneficial tool in improving the marginal adaptation of the restorative material. Therefore, the effect of ultrasonic activation of the lining material at the gingival cavosurface margin was tested in the present research. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the cervical micro-leakage in class II preparations with gingival margin located below cemento enamel junction and restored using open sandwich technique using two different liners and supplemented with or without ultrasonic agitation. Materials and Methods: Forty recently extracted human molars were collected, disinfected and stored in 0.9% saline solution. Standar dized class II cavities were prepared with gingival margin located 1mm below the cemento-enamel junction. Teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n=10) and restored using open sandwich technique as follows - Group A: Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement as liner and Beautifil II as coronal restoration; Group B: Same as group A supplemented with ultrasonic agitation; Group C: Beautifil Flow Plus as liner and Beautifil II as coronal restoration; Group D: Same as Group C supplemented with ultrasonic agitation. Prepared samples were subjected to thermo cycling, followed by immersing in 0.5% methylene blue dye solution. After 24 hours they were cleaned and sectioned in mesio-distal direction using diamond disc and evaluated for microleakage. Obtained scores were statistically analysed using one way ANOVA test and Post Hoc test. Results: Group B showed least microleakage amongst all groups but the results were statistically insignificant (p value > 0.05). Conclusion: Marginal adaptation of liner with ultrasonic activation was somewhat better however, the results were statistically insignificant.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/7479/18120_CE(EK)_F(AK)_PF1(EKAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdfdental leakagelinermethylene blue
spellingShingle Hitesh Chandar Gyanani
Naveen Chhabra
Nimisha Chinmay Shah
Pratik Subash Jais
Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
dental leakage
liner
methylene blue
title Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Study
title_full Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Study
title_short Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Study
title_sort microleakage in sub gingival class ii preparations restored using two different liners for open sandwich technique supplemented with or without ultrasonic agitation an in vitro study
topic dental leakage
liner
methylene blue
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/7479/18120_CE(EK)_F(AK)_PF1(EKAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hiteshchandargyanani microleakageinsubgingivalclassiipreparationsrestoredusingtwodifferentlinersforopensandwichtechniquesupplementedwithorwithoutultrasonicagitationaninvitrostudy
AT naveenchhabra microleakageinsubgingivalclassiipreparationsrestoredusingtwodifferentlinersforopensandwichtechniquesupplementedwithorwithoutultrasonicagitationaninvitrostudy
AT nimishachinmayshah microleakageinsubgingivalclassiipreparationsrestoredusingtwodifferentlinersforopensandwichtechniquesupplementedwithorwithoutultrasonicagitationaninvitrostudy
AT pratiksubashjais microleakageinsubgingivalclassiipreparationsrestoredusingtwodifferentlinersforopensandwichtechniquesupplementedwithorwithoutultrasonicagitationaninvitrostudy