Factors influencing left ventricular thrombus resolution and its significance on clinical outcomes

Abstract Aims A left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is not uncommon in patients with impaired LV systolic function. However, the treatment strategy for LVT has not yet been fully established. We aimed to identify the factors influencing LVT resolution and the significance of LVT resolution on clinical o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Se‐Eun Kim, Chan Joo Lee, Jaewon Oh, Seok‐Min Kang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-06-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14369
_version_ 1797824661219704832
author Se‐Eun Kim
Chan Joo Lee
Jaewon Oh
Seok‐Min Kang
author_facet Se‐Eun Kim
Chan Joo Lee
Jaewon Oh
Seok‐Min Kang
author_sort Se‐Eun Kim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims A left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is not uncommon in patients with impaired LV systolic function. However, the treatment strategy for LVT has not yet been fully established. We aimed to identify the factors influencing LVT resolution and the significance of LVT resolution on clinical outcomes. Methods We retrospectively investigated patients diagnosed with LVT with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% on transthoracic echocardiography from January 2010 to July 2021 in a single tertiary centre. LVT resolution was monitored through serial follow‐up transthoracic echocardiography. The primary clinical outcome was a composite of all‐cause death, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and arterial thromboembolic events. LVT recurrence was also evaluated in patients with LVT resolution. Results There were 212 patients diagnosed with LVT (mean age, 60.5 ± 14.0 years; male, 82.5%). The mean LVEF was 33.1 ± 10.9%, and 71.7% of patients were diagnosed with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Most patients were treated with vitamin K antagonists (86.7%), and 28 patients (13.2%) were treated with direct oral anticoagulants or low molecular weight heparin. LVT resolution was observed in 179 patients (84.4%). LVEF improvement failure within 6 months was a significant factor hindering LVT resolution (hazard ratio, HR: 0.52, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.31–0.85, P = 0.010). During a median 4.0 years of follow‐up (interquartile range, IQR: 1.9 to 7.3 years), 32 patients (15.1%) experienced primary outcomes (18 all‐cause deaths, 15 strokes, and 3 arterial thromboembolisms) and 20 patients (11.2%) experienced LVT recurrence after LVT resolution. LVT resolution was independently associated with a lower risk for primary outcomes (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21–0.98, P = 0.045). In the patients with resolved LVT, discontinuation or duration of anticoagulation after resolution were not significant predictors for LVT recurrence, but LVEF improvement failure at LVT resolution was associated with a significantly higher risk of LVT recurrence (HR: 3.10, 95% CI: 1.23–7.78, P = 0.016). Conclusions This study suggests that LVT resolution is an important predictor for favourable clinical outcomes. LVEF improvement failure interfered with LVT resolution and appeared to be a crucial factor for LVT recurrence. After LVT resolution, continuation of anticoagulation did not seem to impact LVT recurrence and the prognosis.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:42:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b40cb0ae56374b4f8a1725609bd341c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-5822
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:42:23Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj.art-b40cb0ae56374b4f8a1725609bd341c32023-05-18T03:08:57ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222023-06-011031987199510.1002/ehf2.14369Factors influencing left ventricular thrombus resolution and its significance on clinical outcomesSe‐Eun Kim0Chan Joo Lee1Jaewon Oh2Seok‐Min Kang3Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaAbstract Aims A left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is not uncommon in patients with impaired LV systolic function. However, the treatment strategy for LVT has not yet been fully established. We aimed to identify the factors influencing LVT resolution and the significance of LVT resolution on clinical outcomes. Methods We retrospectively investigated patients diagnosed with LVT with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% on transthoracic echocardiography from January 2010 to July 2021 in a single tertiary centre. LVT resolution was monitored through serial follow‐up transthoracic echocardiography. The primary clinical outcome was a composite of all‐cause death, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and arterial thromboembolic events. LVT recurrence was also evaluated in patients with LVT resolution. Results There were 212 patients diagnosed with LVT (mean age, 60.5 ± 14.0 years; male, 82.5%). The mean LVEF was 33.1 ± 10.9%, and 71.7% of patients were diagnosed with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Most patients were treated with vitamin K antagonists (86.7%), and 28 patients (13.2%) were treated with direct oral anticoagulants or low molecular weight heparin. LVT resolution was observed in 179 patients (84.4%). LVEF improvement failure within 6 months was a significant factor hindering LVT resolution (hazard ratio, HR: 0.52, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.31–0.85, P = 0.010). During a median 4.0 years of follow‐up (interquartile range, IQR: 1.9 to 7.3 years), 32 patients (15.1%) experienced primary outcomes (18 all‐cause deaths, 15 strokes, and 3 arterial thromboembolisms) and 20 patients (11.2%) experienced LVT recurrence after LVT resolution. LVT resolution was independently associated with a lower risk for primary outcomes (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21–0.98, P = 0.045). In the patients with resolved LVT, discontinuation or duration of anticoagulation after resolution were not significant predictors for LVT recurrence, but LVEF improvement failure at LVT resolution was associated with a significantly higher risk of LVT recurrence (HR: 3.10, 95% CI: 1.23–7.78, P = 0.016). Conclusions This study suggests that LVT resolution is an important predictor for favourable clinical outcomes. LVEF improvement failure interfered with LVT resolution and appeared to be a crucial factor for LVT recurrence. After LVT resolution, continuation of anticoagulation did not seem to impact LVT recurrence and the prognosis.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14369Left ventricular thrombusLeft ventricular thrombus resolutionLeft ventricular thrombus recurrenceAnticoagulationLeft ventricular systolic functionClinical outcome
spellingShingle Se‐Eun Kim
Chan Joo Lee
Jaewon Oh
Seok‐Min Kang
Factors influencing left ventricular thrombus resolution and its significance on clinical outcomes
ESC Heart Failure
Left ventricular thrombus
Left ventricular thrombus resolution
Left ventricular thrombus recurrence
Anticoagulation
Left ventricular systolic function
Clinical outcome
title Factors influencing left ventricular thrombus resolution and its significance on clinical outcomes
title_full Factors influencing left ventricular thrombus resolution and its significance on clinical outcomes
title_fullStr Factors influencing left ventricular thrombus resolution and its significance on clinical outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing left ventricular thrombus resolution and its significance on clinical outcomes
title_short Factors influencing left ventricular thrombus resolution and its significance on clinical outcomes
title_sort factors influencing left ventricular thrombus resolution and its significance on clinical outcomes
topic Left ventricular thrombus
Left ventricular thrombus resolution
Left ventricular thrombus recurrence
Anticoagulation
Left ventricular systolic function
Clinical outcome
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14369
work_keys_str_mv AT seeunkim factorsinfluencingleftventricularthrombusresolutionanditssignificanceonclinicaloutcomes
AT chanjoolee factorsinfluencingleftventricularthrombusresolutionanditssignificanceonclinicaloutcomes
AT jaewonoh factorsinfluencingleftventricularthrombusresolutionanditssignificanceonclinicaloutcomes
AT seokminkang factorsinfluencingleftventricularthrombusresolutionanditssignificanceonclinicaloutcomes