Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint Dislocation

Purpose: Although treatment strategies of knee joint dislocations have evolved, there is still no consensus on the best method and timing. New therapeutic concepts suggest that early one-stage treatment, including suturing and bracing of the cruciate ligaments in acute knee joint dislocation, are le...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julius Watrinet, Christian von Rüden, Stephan Regenbogen, Andreas Brand, Markus Bormann, Fabian M. Stuby, Julian Fürmetz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/1/266
_version_ 1797625493434925056
author Julius Watrinet
Christian von Rüden
Stephan Regenbogen
Andreas Brand
Markus Bormann
Fabian M. Stuby
Julian Fürmetz
author_facet Julius Watrinet
Christian von Rüden
Stephan Regenbogen
Andreas Brand
Markus Bormann
Fabian M. Stuby
Julian Fürmetz
author_sort Julius Watrinet
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Although treatment strategies of knee joint dislocations have evolved, there is still no consensus on the best method and timing. New therapeutic concepts suggest that early one-stage treatment, including suturing and bracing of the cruciate ligaments in acute knee joint dislocation, are leading to improved functional results. This study aimed to evaluate the midterm functional outcome following traumatic knee joint dislocation and to determine whether the outcome is influenced by the surgical management, patient habitus or concomitant injuries. Methods: In this retrospective single center study, 38 patients with acute Schenck type II to IV knee dislocations were treated over an eight-year period in a level I trauma center. At follow-up, various clinical scores, such as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score, Lysholm Score, and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), and individual questions about rehabilitation and activity levels of 38 patients were evaluated. Results: Mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.7 years. The mean IKDC Score was 65.6 ± 15.7 points, the average Lysholm Score was 70.5 ± 16.4 points and the median TAS was 4 (0–7), resulting in a loss of activity of 2 (range 0–6) points. There was no significant difference between a one-stage treatment compared to a two-stage approach. Ligament reconstruction of the ACL in a two-stage approach was required in only 33.3%. Further operations (early and late) were performed in 37% of cases. Being overweight was associated with more complications and worse outcomes, and external fixation with arthrofibrosis. Conclusions: Knee dislocation is a severe trauma that often leads to a prolonged loss of function and increased knee pain over years, affecting the patient’s activity. Clinical outcome is influenced significantly by concomitant injuries. Severe cases with initial external fixation are associated with a higher risk of knee stiffness and should be considered during rehabilitation. Obese patients present a challenge due to higher complication rates and lower postoperative knee function. Level of evidence: Retrospective single center study, level III.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:57:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b4189d8bc17f4286affab2fa92223d41
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:57:13Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b4189d8bc17f4286affab2fa92223d412023-11-16T15:43:45ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-12-0112126610.3390/jcm12010266Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint DislocationJulius Watrinet0Christian von Rüden1Stephan Regenbogen2Andreas Brand3Markus Bormann4Fabian M. Stuby5Julian Fürmetz6Department Trauma Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, 82418 Murnau, GermanyDepartment Trauma Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, 82418 Murnau, GermanyDepartment Trauma Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, 82418 Murnau, GermanyInstitute for Biomechanics, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, AustriaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, GermanyDepartment Trauma Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, 82418 Murnau, GermanyDepartment Trauma Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, 82418 Murnau, GermanyPurpose: Although treatment strategies of knee joint dislocations have evolved, there is still no consensus on the best method and timing. New therapeutic concepts suggest that early one-stage treatment, including suturing and bracing of the cruciate ligaments in acute knee joint dislocation, are leading to improved functional results. This study aimed to evaluate the midterm functional outcome following traumatic knee joint dislocation and to determine whether the outcome is influenced by the surgical management, patient habitus or concomitant injuries. Methods: In this retrospective single center study, 38 patients with acute Schenck type II to IV knee dislocations were treated over an eight-year period in a level I trauma center. At follow-up, various clinical scores, such as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score, Lysholm Score, and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), and individual questions about rehabilitation and activity levels of 38 patients were evaluated. Results: Mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.7 years. The mean IKDC Score was 65.6 ± 15.7 points, the average Lysholm Score was 70.5 ± 16.4 points and the median TAS was 4 (0–7), resulting in a loss of activity of 2 (range 0–6) points. There was no significant difference between a one-stage treatment compared to a two-stage approach. Ligament reconstruction of the ACL in a two-stage approach was required in only 33.3%. Further operations (early and late) were performed in 37% of cases. Being overweight was associated with more complications and worse outcomes, and external fixation with arthrofibrosis. Conclusions: Knee dislocation is a severe trauma that often leads to a prolonged loss of function and increased knee pain over years, affecting the patient’s activity. Clinical outcome is influenced significantly by concomitant injuries. Severe cases with initial external fixation are associated with a higher risk of knee stiffness and should be considered during rehabilitation. Obese patients present a challenge due to higher complication rates and lower postoperative knee function. Level of evidence: Retrospective single center study, level III.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/1/266kneeknee dislocationACLPCLexternal fixationarthrofibrosis
spellingShingle Julius Watrinet
Christian von Rüden
Stephan Regenbogen
Andreas Brand
Markus Bormann
Fabian M. Stuby
Julian Fürmetz
Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint Dislocation
Journal of Clinical Medicine
knee
knee dislocation
ACL
PCL
external fixation
arthrofibrosis
title Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint Dislocation
title_full Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint Dislocation
title_fullStr Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint Dislocation
title_full_unstemmed Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint Dislocation
title_short Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint Dislocation
title_sort mid term results following traumatic knee joint dislocation
topic knee
knee dislocation
ACL
PCL
external fixation
arthrofibrosis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/1/266
work_keys_str_mv AT juliuswatrinet midtermresultsfollowingtraumatickneejointdislocation
AT christianvonruden midtermresultsfollowingtraumatickneejointdislocation
AT stephanregenbogen midtermresultsfollowingtraumatickneejointdislocation
AT andreasbrand midtermresultsfollowingtraumatickneejointdislocation
AT markusbormann midtermresultsfollowingtraumatickneejointdislocation
AT fabianmstuby midtermresultsfollowingtraumatickneejointdislocation
AT julianfurmetz midtermresultsfollowingtraumatickneejointdislocation