Augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibility

There is a need within the criminal justice systems of many countries to create a valid and applicable system of investigative interviewing and credibility assessment. The present study assesses the general validity one such system, called Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID). ACID com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roland Fleck, Amber Hines, Cheryl Hiscock-Anisman, Kevin Colwell, Ryan Ansarra, Lindsey Cole, Delyana Belarde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense 2011-07-01
Series:European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
Subjects:
Online Access:http://webs.uvigo.es/sepjf/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=39&Itemid=110&lang=en
_version_ 1818026008112005120
author Roland Fleck
Amber Hines
Cheryl Hiscock-Anisman
Kevin Colwell
Ryan Ansarra
Lindsey Cole
Delyana Belarde
author_facet Roland Fleck
Amber Hines
Cheryl Hiscock-Anisman
Kevin Colwell
Ryan Ansarra
Lindsey Cole
Delyana Belarde
author_sort Roland Fleck
collection DOAJ
description There is a need within the criminal justice systems of many countries to create a valid and applicable system of investigative interviewing and credibility assessment. The present study assesses the general validity one such system, called Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID). ACID comprises interviewing strategies that facilitate the detection of deception and content criteria that highlight differences in verbal behavior. Sixty university undergraduates performed a staged theft under time pressure and with incentives designed to increase external validity. The participants were interviewed and assessed using the ACID procedure. Half of them were instructed to answer honestly and the other half to deny his/her participation in the theft. Results showed that honest statements were longer, more vividly detailed, and more spontaneously structured than deceptive statements. Also, the addition of affective details as a dependent measure significantly improved the ACID system. Overall, 48 of 60 statements were accurately classified (26 of 30 honest statements and 22 of 30 deceptive statements). The ACID procedure was effective and benefited from the addition of affective details. The strengths and weaknesses of this study are discussed in light of basic research into deception and potential forensic application.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T04:25:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b419c8376e41481c903625ecbabfaceb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1889-1861
1989-4007
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T04:25:10Z
publishDate 2011-07-01
publisher Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense
record_format Article
series European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
spelling doaj.art-b419c8376e41481c903625ecbabfaceb2022-12-22T02:02:18ZengSociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y ForenseEuropean Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context1889-18611989-40072011-07-0132141158Augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibilityRoland FleckAmber HinesCheryl Hiscock-AnismanKevin ColwellRyan AnsarraLindsey ColeDelyana BelardeThere is a need within the criminal justice systems of many countries to create a valid and applicable system of investigative interviewing and credibility assessment. The present study assesses the general validity one such system, called Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID). ACID comprises interviewing strategies that facilitate the detection of deception and content criteria that highlight differences in verbal behavior. Sixty university undergraduates performed a staged theft under time pressure and with incentives designed to increase external validity. The participants were interviewed and assessed using the ACID procedure. Half of them were instructed to answer honestly and the other half to deny his/her participation in the theft. Results showed that honest statements were longer, more vividly detailed, and more spontaneously structured than deceptive statements. Also, the addition of affective details as a dependent measure significantly improved the ACID system. Overall, 48 of 60 statements were accurately classified (26 of 30 honest statements and 22 of 30 deceptive statements). The ACID procedure was effective and benefited from the addition of affective details. The strengths and weaknesses of this study are discussed in light of basic research into deception and potential forensic application.http://webs.uvigo.es/sepjf/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=39&Itemid=110&lang=enInvestigative interviewingCredibility assessmentDetecting deceptionContent analysisTestimony
spellingShingle Roland Fleck
Amber Hines
Cheryl Hiscock-Anisman
Kevin Colwell
Ryan Ansarra
Lindsey Cole
Delyana Belarde
Augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibility
European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
Investigative interviewing
Credibility assessment
Detecting deception
Content analysis
Testimony
title Augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibility
title_full Augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibility
title_fullStr Augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibility
title_full_unstemmed Augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibility
title_short Augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibility
title_sort augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibility
topic Investigative interviewing
Credibility assessment
Detecting deception
Content analysis
Testimony
url http://webs.uvigo.es/sepjf/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=39&Itemid=110&lang=en
work_keys_str_mv AT rolandfleck augmentingacidwithaffectivedetailstoassesscredibility
AT amberhines augmentingacidwithaffectivedetailstoassesscredibility
AT cherylhiscockanisman augmentingacidwithaffectivedetailstoassesscredibility
AT kevincolwell augmentingacidwithaffectivedetailstoassesscredibility
AT ryanansarra augmentingacidwithaffectivedetailstoassesscredibility
AT lindseycole augmentingacidwithaffectivedetailstoassesscredibility
AT delyanabelarde augmentingacidwithaffectivedetailstoassesscredibility