FACTOR OF EDUCATION IN SOFT POWER OF THE UNITED STATES, CHINA AND THE EU: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

“Soft power” has been an integral part of the foreign policy Arsenal of a number of States in recent decades. Including various tools, “soft power” as one of the most effective tools used to achieve the goals, includes education. Even during the cold war, the West and theSoviet Unionactively used ed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: E. A. Antyukhova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jurist, Publishing Group 2019-05-01
Series:Сравнительная политика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://comparativepolitics.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/966
_version_ 1797422385110974464
author E. A. Antyukhova
author_facet E. A. Antyukhova
author_sort E. A. Antyukhova
collection DOAJ
description “Soft power” has been an integral part of the foreign policy Arsenal of a number of States in recent decades. Including various tools, “soft power” as one of the most effective tools used to achieve the goals, includes education. Even during the cold war, the West and theSoviet Unionactively used education to train personnel in third countries who fully share the values of one or another party. In a multipolar world, the situation has changed somewhat-now all the major States, as well as their associations, seek to use education as a means of influence and influence on their counterparts. The article considers and analyzes the mechanisms used by this actors in the implementation of the policy of «soft power» through education, using the example of theUSA,Chinaand the European Union. As the analysis carried out in the article showed, both theUS,Chinaand the EU are actively using education to achieve their foreign policy goals. At the same time, their educational policy directed from outside has significant differences. As a result, we can talk about three different models of using education as a tool of «soft power». Each of them has its own distinctive features associated primarily with the specific mechanisms of use of education, as well as the content of educational policy and its meaning and ideological content. Nevertheless, despite the serious differences, we can confidently say that all three of the subjects of international relations considered in the article use education very successfully, often achieving a positive effect for themselves in the regions of their national interests.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T07:31:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b41d68e3aa9847e7b8f6409367fbcd4e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2221-3279
2412-4990
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T07:31:31Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Jurist, Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Сравнительная политика
spelling doaj.art-b41d68e3aa9847e7b8f6409367fbcd4e2023-12-03T06:22:56ZengJurist, Publishing GroupСравнительная политика2221-32792412-49902019-05-01102869810.24411/2221-3279-2019-10018598FACTOR OF EDUCATION IN SOFT POWER OF THE UNITED STATES, CHINA AND THE EU: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSISE. A. Antyukhova0Московский государственный институт международных отношений (Университет) МИД России“Soft power” has been an integral part of the foreign policy Arsenal of a number of States in recent decades. Including various tools, “soft power” as one of the most effective tools used to achieve the goals, includes education. Even during the cold war, the West and theSoviet Unionactively used education to train personnel in third countries who fully share the values of one or another party. In a multipolar world, the situation has changed somewhat-now all the major States, as well as their associations, seek to use education as a means of influence and influence on their counterparts. The article considers and analyzes the mechanisms used by this actors in the implementation of the policy of «soft power» through education, using the example of theUSA,Chinaand the European Union. As the analysis carried out in the article showed, both theUS,Chinaand the EU are actively using education to achieve their foreign policy goals. At the same time, their educational policy directed from outside has significant differences. As a result, we can talk about three different models of using education as a tool of «soft power». Each of them has its own distinctive features associated primarily with the specific mechanisms of use of education, as well as the content of educational policy and its meaning and ideological content. Nevertheless, despite the serious differences, we can confidently say that all three of the subjects of international relations considered in the article use education very successfully, often achieving a positive effect for themselves in the regions of their national interests.https://comparativepolitics.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/966мягкая силаобразованиеобразовательная политикасшакитайевропейский союзпрограммы обменаобразовательные фонды
spellingShingle E. A. Antyukhova
FACTOR OF EDUCATION IN SOFT POWER OF THE UNITED STATES, CHINA AND THE EU: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Сравнительная политика
мягкая сила
образование
образовательная политика
сша
китай
европейский союз
программы обмена
образовательные фонды
title FACTOR OF EDUCATION IN SOFT POWER OF THE UNITED STATES, CHINA AND THE EU: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full FACTOR OF EDUCATION IN SOFT POWER OF THE UNITED STATES, CHINA AND THE EU: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_fullStr FACTOR OF EDUCATION IN SOFT POWER OF THE UNITED STATES, CHINA AND THE EU: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed FACTOR OF EDUCATION IN SOFT POWER OF THE UNITED STATES, CHINA AND THE EU: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_short FACTOR OF EDUCATION IN SOFT POWER OF THE UNITED STATES, CHINA AND THE EU: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_sort factor of education in soft power of the united states china and the eu a comparative analysis
topic мягкая сила
образование
образовательная политика
сша
китай
европейский союз
программы обмена
образовательные фонды
url https://comparativepolitics.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/966
work_keys_str_mv AT eaantyukhova factorofeducationinsoftpoweroftheunitedstateschinaandtheeuacomparativeanalysis