Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BackgroundNon-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques and mirror therapy (MT) are promising rehabilitation measures for stroke. While the combination of MT and NIBS has been employed for post-stroke upper limb motor functional rehabilitation, its effectiveness has not been examined.ObjectiveThi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qingqing Zhao, Hong Li, Yu Liu, Haonan Mei, Liying Guo, Xianying Liu, Xiaolin Tao, Jiang Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.918956/full
_version_ 1811218401231634432
author Qingqing Zhao
Qingqing Zhao
Hong Li
Yu Liu
Yu Liu
Haonan Mei
Liying Guo
Liying Guo
Xianying Liu
Xianying Liu
Xiaolin Tao
Jiang Ma
author_facet Qingqing Zhao
Qingqing Zhao
Hong Li
Yu Liu
Yu Liu
Haonan Mei
Liying Guo
Liying Guo
Xianying Liu
Xianying Liu
Xiaolin Tao
Jiang Ma
author_sort Qingqing Zhao
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundNon-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques and mirror therapy (MT) are promising rehabilitation measures for stroke. While the combination of MT and NIBS has been employed for post-stroke upper limb motor functional rehabilitation, its effectiveness has not been examined.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined MT and NIBS in the recovery of upper limb motor function in stroke patients.MethodsThe search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, CNKI, WANFANG and VIP until December 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing MT or NIBS alone with the combination of NIBS and MT in improving upper extremity motor recovery after stroke were selected. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the mean differences (MD) or the standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with random-effect models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted according to the types of control group, the types of NIBS, stimulation timing and phase poststroke.ResultsA total of 12 articles, including 17 studies with 628 patients, were reviewed in the meta-analysis. In comparison with MT or NIBS alone, the combined group significantly improved body structure and function (MD = 5.97; 95% CI: 5.01–6.93; P < 0.05), activity levels (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI 0.61–1.02; P < 0.05). For cortical excitability, the motor evoked potential cortical latency (SMD = −1.05; 95% CI:−1.57–−0.52; P < 0.05) and the central motor conduction time (SMD=-1.31 95% CI:−2.02-−0.61; P < 0.05) of the combined group were significantly shortened. A non-significant homogeneous summary effect size was found for MEP amplitude (SMD = 0.47; 95%CI = −0.29 to 1.23; P = 0.23). Subgroup analysis showed that there is an interaction between the stimulation sequence and the combined treatment effect.ConclusionIn this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, in comparison to the control groups, MT combined with NIBS promoted the recovery of upper extremity motor function after stroke, which was reflected in the analysis of body structure and function, activity levels, and cortical excitability.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022304455.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:09:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b41dfe08fcb24b1187165e23f5ab8436
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:09:49Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-b41dfe08fcb24b1187165e23f5ab84362022-12-22T03:42:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952022-07-011310.3389/fneur.2022.918956918956Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trialsQingqing Zhao0Qingqing Zhao1Hong Li2Yu Liu3Yu Liu4Haonan Mei5Liying Guo6Liying Guo7Xianying Liu8Xianying Liu9Xiaolin Tao10Jiang Ma11Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, ChinaCollege of Nursing and Rehabilitation, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, ChinaFaculty of Graduate Studies, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, ChinaCollege of Nursing and Rehabilitation, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, ChinaCollege of Nursing and Rehabilitation, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, ChinaFaculty of Graduate Studies, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, ChinaBackgroundNon-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques and mirror therapy (MT) are promising rehabilitation measures for stroke. While the combination of MT and NIBS has been employed for post-stroke upper limb motor functional rehabilitation, its effectiveness has not been examined.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined MT and NIBS in the recovery of upper limb motor function in stroke patients.MethodsThe search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, CNKI, WANFANG and VIP until December 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing MT or NIBS alone with the combination of NIBS and MT in improving upper extremity motor recovery after stroke were selected. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the mean differences (MD) or the standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with random-effect models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted according to the types of control group, the types of NIBS, stimulation timing and phase poststroke.ResultsA total of 12 articles, including 17 studies with 628 patients, were reviewed in the meta-analysis. In comparison with MT or NIBS alone, the combined group significantly improved body structure and function (MD = 5.97; 95% CI: 5.01–6.93; P < 0.05), activity levels (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI 0.61–1.02; P < 0.05). For cortical excitability, the motor evoked potential cortical latency (SMD = −1.05; 95% CI:−1.57–−0.52; P < 0.05) and the central motor conduction time (SMD=-1.31 95% CI:−2.02-−0.61; P < 0.05) of the combined group were significantly shortened. A non-significant homogeneous summary effect size was found for MEP amplitude (SMD = 0.47; 95%CI = −0.29 to 1.23; P = 0.23). Subgroup analysis showed that there is an interaction between the stimulation sequence and the combined treatment effect.ConclusionIn this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, in comparison to the control groups, MT combined with NIBS promoted the recovery of upper extremity motor function after stroke, which was reflected in the analysis of body structure and function, activity levels, and cortical excitability.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022304455.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.918956/fullstrokemirror therapy (MT)non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)upper motor functionrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
spellingShingle Qingqing Zhao
Qingqing Zhao
Hong Li
Yu Liu
Yu Liu
Haonan Mei
Liying Guo
Liying Guo
Xianying Liu
Xianying Liu
Xiaolin Tao
Jiang Ma
Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Frontiers in Neurology
stroke
mirror therapy (MT)
non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)
upper motor function
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
title Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_full Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_fullStr Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_short Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_sort non invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke systematic review and meta analysis of randomized clinical trials
topic stroke
mirror therapy (MT)
non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)
upper motor function
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.918956/full
work_keys_str_mv AT qingqingzhao noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT qingqingzhao noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT hongli noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT yuliu noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT yuliu noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT haonanmei noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT liyingguo noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT liyingguo noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT xianyingliu noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT xianyingliu noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT xiaolintao noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT jiangma noninvasivebrainstimulationassociatedmirrortherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstrokesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials