Scholarly productivity and citation impact of Australian academic psychologists
Objective This study sought to provide up‐to‐date normative data on the productivity and citation impact of publications by Australian academic psychologists at each academic level (lecturer to professor) and for each university grouping (e.g., Group of Eight [Go8], Australian Technology Network, et...
Main Authors: | Trevor G. Mazzucchelli, Emma Burton, Lynne Roberts |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Australian Journal of Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12248 |
Similar Items
-
Scholarly productivity and citation impact of academic psychologists in Group of Eight universities
by: Nick Haslam, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Research productivity, quality, and impact metrics of Australian psychology academics
by: Belinda M. Craig, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist’s scholarly impact
by: Courtney B. Shires, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
The “Russian Hirsch”: Predictors of Citation Usage of Scholarly Works in the RSCI
by: Arkady Margolis, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Interdisciplinary Comparison of Scientific Impact of Publications Using the Citation-Ratio
by: Arthur R. Bos, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)