Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States
Scientific and/or technical breakthroughs require the exploration of novel ideas and technologies. Yet, it has not been studied quantitatively how national institutional contexts either facilitate or stifle organizational support for exploration. Available qualitative evidence suggests that institut...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526927/?tool=EBI |
| _version_ | 1818969828276305920 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas Heinze Marie von der Heyden David Pithan Gemma Elizabeth Derrick |
| author_facet | Thomas Heinze Marie von der Heyden David Pithan Gemma Elizabeth Derrick |
| author_sort | Thomas Heinze |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Scientific and/or technical breakthroughs require the exploration of novel ideas and technologies. Yet, it has not been studied quantitatively how national institutional contexts either facilitate or stifle organizational support for exploration. Available qualitative evidence suggests that institutional contexts that exert weak control over universities and research organizations strengthen their capabilities to achieve scientific breakthroughs, while contexts with strong control constrain them. The paper is based on an analysis of the population of Nobel laureates in Physics, Chemistry and Physiology or Medicine. We examine to what extent existing qualitative findings for the biomedical sciences, which are partly based on Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine, can be substantiated both quantitatively and across the three Nobel Prize fields of science. We find that for most of the 20th century and the early 21st century, countries with weak institutional control (United Kingdom, United States) have outperformed those exerting strong control (France, Germany). These results are further corroborated when controlled by population sizes and by GDP per capita. In addition, these results hold not only for the biomedical sciences, but also for Physics and Chemistry. Furthermore, countries with weak institutional control have attracted many future Nobel laureates from countries with strong environments. In this regard, the United States appears to be a particularly attractive setting for conducting innovative research, and thus has been a magnet for young and promising scientists. However, future laureates working in institutional environments exerting weak control are not faster in accomplishing their prize-winning work compared to those laureates working in more restrictive institutional settings. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T14:26:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b43f0f7daf464573ab401b09325b0085 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T14:26:47Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-b43f0f7daf464573ab401b09325b00852022-12-21T19:37:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United StatesThomas HeinzeMarie von der HeydenDavid PithanGemma Elizabeth DerrickScientific and/or technical breakthroughs require the exploration of novel ideas and technologies. Yet, it has not been studied quantitatively how national institutional contexts either facilitate or stifle organizational support for exploration. Available qualitative evidence suggests that institutional contexts that exert weak control over universities and research organizations strengthen their capabilities to achieve scientific breakthroughs, while contexts with strong control constrain them. The paper is based on an analysis of the population of Nobel laureates in Physics, Chemistry and Physiology or Medicine. We examine to what extent existing qualitative findings for the biomedical sciences, which are partly based on Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine, can be substantiated both quantitatively and across the three Nobel Prize fields of science. We find that for most of the 20th century and the early 21st century, countries with weak institutional control (United Kingdom, United States) have outperformed those exerting strong control (France, Germany). These results are further corroborated when controlled by population sizes and by GDP per capita. In addition, these results hold not only for the biomedical sciences, but also for Physics and Chemistry. Furthermore, countries with weak institutional control have attracted many future Nobel laureates from countries with strong environments. In this regard, the United States appears to be a particularly attractive setting for conducting innovative research, and thus has been a magnet for young and promising scientists. However, future laureates working in institutional environments exerting weak control are not faster in accomplishing their prize-winning work compared to those laureates working in more restrictive institutional settings.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526927/?tool=EBI |
| spellingShingle | Thomas Heinze Marie von der Heyden David Pithan Gemma Elizabeth Derrick Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States PLoS ONE |
| title | Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States |
| title_full | Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States |
| title_fullStr | Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States |
| title_full_unstemmed | Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States |
| title_short | Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States |
| title_sort | institutional environments and breakthroughs in science comparison of france germany the united kingdom and the united states |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526927/?tool=EBI |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasheinze institutionalenvironmentsandbreakthroughsinsciencecomparisonoffrancegermanytheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstates AT marievonderheyden institutionalenvironmentsandbreakthroughsinsciencecomparisonoffrancegermanytheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstates AT davidpithan institutionalenvironmentsandbreakthroughsinsciencecomparisonoffrancegermanytheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstates AT gemmaelizabethderrick institutionalenvironmentsandbreakthroughsinsciencecomparisonoffrancegermanytheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstates |