Multi-detector CT chest: can it omit the further need for contrast enhnaced spectral mammography in breast cancer patients candidate for CT staging?

Abstract Background During multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) of the chest, incidental breast lesions (IBLs) are occasionally encountered. Mammography remains the gold standard for the early detection of breast cancer. However, limitations exist in patients with dense breasts. Contrast spectr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasha Wessam Abdel Rahman, Salwa Yahya Ahmed Al-Dhurani, Amira Hamed Radwan, Ahmed Abdellatif Mohamed, Eman Faker Kamal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-07-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00826-9
_version_ 1817968760334581760
author Rasha Wessam Abdel Rahman
Salwa Yahya Ahmed Al-Dhurani
Amira Hamed Radwan
Ahmed Abdellatif Mohamed
Eman Faker Kamal
author_facet Rasha Wessam Abdel Rahman
Salwa Yahya Ahmed Al-Dhurani
Amira Hamed Radwan
Ahmed Abdellatif Mohamed
Eman Faker Kamal
author_sort Rasha Wessam Abdel Rahman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background During multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) of the chest, incidental breast lesions (IBLs) are occasionally encountered. Mammography remains the gold standard for the early detection of breast cancer. However, limitations exist in patients with dense breasts. Contrast spectral mammography (CESM) is widely available compared to MRI; it increases the sensitivity for breast cancer detection without decreasing the specificity. Results The study is a prospective study that included 113 female breast cancer patients for CT staging. One hundred and six of the patients had unilateral carcinoma and 7 of them had bilateral cancer with a total of 120 breasts evaluated. The CT findings were correlated with CESM findings regarding the multiplicity and bilaterality of the disease. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the CT in the detection of multiplicity were 97.44%, 100%, 100%, 95.45%, and 98.33%, respectively, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the CT in the detection of bilateral disease were 68.18%, 97.96%, 88.24%, 93.20%, and 92.50%, respectively. Conclusions Breast cancer patients for MDCT chest as a part of their metastatic workup can omit the further need for CESM.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:12:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b44a596a7a124dee8dd346b0b45dad3a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-4762
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:12:06Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b44a596a7a124dee8dd346b0b45dad3a2022-12-22T02:31:48ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine2090-47622022-07-015311810.1186/s43055-022-00826-9Multi-detector CT chest: can it omit the further need for contrast enhnaced spectral mammography in breast cancer patients candidate for CT staging?Rasha Wessam Abdel Rahman0Salwa Yahya Ahmed Al-Dhurani1Amira Hamed Radwan2Ahmed Abdellatif Mohamed3Eman Faker Kamal4Radiology Department, Cairo UniversityRadiology Department, Cairo UniversityBaheya Center for Early Detection and Treatment of Breast CancerBaheya Center for Early Detection and Treatment of Breast CancerRadiology Department, Cairo UniversityAbstract Background During multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) of the chest, incidental breast lesions (IBLs) are occasionally encountered. Mammography remains the gold standard for the early detection of breast cancer. However, limitations exist in patients with dense breasts. Contrast spectral mammography (CESM) is widely available compared to MRI; it increases the sensitivity for breast cancer detection without decreasing the specificity. Results The study is a prospective study that included 113 female breast cancer patients for CT staging. One hundred and six of the patients had unilateral carcinoma and 7 of them had bilateral cancer with a total of 120 breasts evaluated. The CT findings were correlated with CESM findings regarding the multiplicity and bilaterality of the disease. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the CT in the detection of multiplicity were 97.44%, 100%, 100%, 95.45%, and 98.33%, respectively, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the CT in the detection of bilateral disease were 68.18%, 97.96%, 88.24%, 93.20%, and 92.50%, respectively. Conclusions Breast cancer patients for MDCT chest as a part of their metastatic workup can omit the further need for CESM.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00826-9Contrast-enhanced spectral mammographyMulti-detector CTMultifocalMulticentric
spellingShingle Rasha Wessam Abdel Rahman
Salwa Yahya Ahmed Al-Dhurani
Amira Hamed Radwan
Ahmed Abdellatif Mohamed
Eman Faker Kamal
Multi-detector CT chest: can it omit the further need for contrast enhnaced spectral mammography in breast cancer patients candidate for CT staging?
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
Multi-detector CT
Multifocal
Multicentric
title Multi-detector CT chest: can it omit the further need for contrast enhnaced spectral mammography in breast cancer patients candidate for CT staging?
title_full Multi-detector CT chest: can it omit the further need for contrast enhnaced spectral mammography in breast cancer patients candidate for CT staging?
title_fullStr Multi-detector CT chest: can it omit the further need for contrast enhnaced spectral mammography in breast cancer patients candidate for CT staging?
title_full_unstemmed Multi-detector CT chest: can it omit the further need for contrast enhnaced spectral mammography in breast cancer patients candidate for CT staging?
title_short Multi-detector CT chest: can it omit the further need for contrast enhnaced spectral mammography in breast cancer patients candidate for CT staging?
title_sort multi detector ct chest can it omit the further need for contrast enhnaced spectral mammography in breast cancer patients candidate for ct staging
topic Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
Multi-detector CT
Multifocal
Multicentric
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00826-9
work_keys_str_mv AT rashawessamabdelrahman multidetectorctchestcanitomitthefurtherneedforcontrastenhnacedspectralmammographyinbreastcancerpatientscandidateforctstaging
AT salwayahyaahmedaldhurani multidetectorctchestcanitomitthefurtherneedforcontrastenhnacedspectralmammographyinbreastcancerpatientscandidateforctstaging
AT amirahamedradwan multidetectorctchestcanitomitthefurtherneedforcontrastenhnacedspectralmammographyinbreastcancerpatientscandidateforctstaging
AT ahmedabdellatifmohamed multidetectorctchestcanitomitthefurtherneedforcontrastenhnacedspectralmammographyinbreastcancerpatientscandidateforctstaging
AT emanfakerkamal multidetectorctchestcanitomitthefurtherneedforcontrastenhnacedspectralmammographyinbreastcancerpatientscandidateforctstaging