Buy One Get One: The Legal and Socio-Cultural Context of ‘Gifting’ Within the Australian Human Remains Trade

Today’s global human remains trade – how it operates on and offline, where remains come from, and how algorithmic amplification allows for complex networks to form between buyers, sellers, and middlemen – has seen an increasing amount of research and media attention. Underpinning this increasing int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Damien Huffer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://account.journal.caa-international.org/index.php/up-j-jcaa/article/view/137
_version_ 1797315807775031296
author Damien Huffer
author_facet Damien Huffer
author_sort Damien Huffer
collection DOAJ
description Today’s global human remains trade – how it operates on and offline, where remains come from, and how algorithmic amplification allows for complex networks to form between buyers, sellers, and middlemen – has seen an increasing amount of research and media attention. Underpinning this increasing interest is the growing realization that poorly regulated trafficking inflicts genuine psychological harm on the living (whether relatives of body donors or descendant communities), as well as accrues losses to the archaeological record or risks the jeopardization of crime scenes. Much of this work, however, has focused on the global north. Within the global south, Australia is recognized as an emerging market country for many categories of cultural heritage trafficking, including human remains. This paper reviews the function and socio-legal context of a specific seller’s tactic so far seen only among Australian human remains collectors, whereby photographs of human remains are offered for sale, with the bones themselves included as a “gift”. From a network analysis of text from a corpus of anonymized posts from Facebook, conducted using t-SNE and Voyant Tools, 11 key discourse themes are identified that point to how and why this sales tactic is used. Better understanding its function is a necessary first step to closing this loophole within Australian law, but also to identifying similar tricks at work within collector networks elsewhere.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T03:09:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b455cc3eb51a4a40a063904833b121ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2514-8362
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T03:09:11Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
spelling doaj.art-b455cc3eb51a4a40a063904833b121ba2024-02-13T07:37:03ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Computer Applications in Archaeology2514-83622024-01-017111512510.5334/jcaa.137135Buy One Get One: The Legal and Socio-Cultural Context of ‘Gifting’ Within the Australian Human Remains TradeDamien Huffer0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-1772School of Social Science, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4067, QLD, Australia; Department of History, Carleton University, Ottawa, K1S 5B6, ONToday’s global human remains trade – how it operates on and offline, where remains come from, and how algorithmic amplification allows for complex networks to form between buyers, sellers, and middlemen – has seen an increasing amount of research and media attention. Underpinning this increasing interest is the growing realization that poorly regulated trafficking inflicts genuine psychological harm on the living (whether relatives of body donors or descendant communities), as well as accrues losses to the archaeological record or risks the jeopardization of crime scenes. Much of this work, however, has focused on the global north. Within the global south, Australia is recognized as an emerging market country for many categories of cultural heritage trafficking, including human remains. This paper reviews the function and socio-legal context of a specific seller’s tactic so far seen only among Australian human remains collectors, whereby photographs of human remains are offered for sale, with the bones themselves included as a “gift”. From a network analysis of text from a corpus of anonymized posts from Facebook, conducted using t-SNE and Voyant Tools, 11 key discourse themes are identified that point to how and why this sales tactic is used. Better understanding its function is a necessary first step to closing this loophole within Australian law, but also to identifying similar tricks at work within collector networks elsewhere.https://account.journal.caa-international.org/index.php/up-j-jcaa/article/view/137australiafacebookhuman remains traffickingdiscourse analysist-snevoyant tools
spellingShingle Damien Huffer
Buy One Get One: The Legal and Socio-Cultural Context of ‘Gifting’ Within the Australian Human Remains Trade
Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
australia
facebook
human remains trafficking
discourse analysis
t-sne
voyant tools
title Buy One Get One: The Legal and Socio-Cultural Context of ‘Gifting’ Within the Australian Human Remains Trade
title_full Buy One Get One: The Legal and Socio-Cultural Context of ‘Gifting’ Within the Australian Human Remains Trade
title_fullStr Buy One Get One: The Legal and Socio-Cultural Context of ‘Gifting’ Within the Australian Human Remains Trade
title_full_unstemmed Buy One Get One: The Legal and Socio-Cultural Context of ‘Gifting’ Within the Australian Human Remains Trade
title_short Buy One Get One: The Legal and Socio-Cultural Context of ‘Gifting’ Within the Australian Human Remains Trade
title_sort buy one get one the legal and socio cultural context of gifting within the australian human remains trade
topic australia
facebook
human remains trafficking
discourse analysis
t-sne
voyant tools
url https://account.journal.caa-international.org/index.php/up-j-jcaa/article/view/137
work_keys_str_mv AT damienhuffer buyonegetonethelegalandsocioculturalcontextofgiftingwithintheaustralianhumanremainstrade