Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study

Abstract Background Retained surgical sharps (RSS) is a “never event” that is preventable but may still occur despite of correct count and negative X-ray. This study assesses the feasibility of a novel device (“Melzi Sharps Finder®” or MSF) in effective detection of RSS. Methods The first study cons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hae Sung Kang, Jad Khoraki, Jessie Gie, Dielle Duval, Susan Haynes, Michael Siev, Jay Shah, Fernando Kim, Martin Mangino, Levi Procter, Riccardo Autorino, Samuel Weprin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:Patient Safety in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00359-8
_version_ 1797836303935471616
author Hae Sung Kang
Jad Khoraki
Jessie Gie
Dielle Duval
Susan Haynes
Michael Siev
Jay Shah
Fernando Kim
Martin Mangino
Levi Procter
Riccardo Autorino
Samuel Weprin
author_facet Hae Sung Kang
Jad Khoraki
Jessie Gie
Dielle Duval
Susan Haynes
Michael Siev
Jay Shah
Fernando Kim
Martin Mangino
Levi Procter
Riccardo Autorino
Samuel Weprin
author_sort Hae Sung Kang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Retained surgical sharps (RSS) is a “never event” that is preventable but may still occur despite of correct count and negative X-ray. This study assesses the feasibility of a novel device (“Melzi Sharps Finder®” or MSF) in effective detection of RSS. Methods The first study consisted of determination of the presence of RSS or identification of RSS in an ex-vivo model (a container with hay in a laparoscopic trainer box). The second study consisted of determining presence of RSS in an in-vivo model (laparoscopy in live adult Yorkshire pigs) with 3 groups: C-arm, C-arm with MSF and MSF. The third study used similar apparatus though with laparotomy and included 2 groups: manual search and MSF. Results In the first study, the MSF group had a higher rate of identification of a needle and decreased time to locate a needle versus control (98.1% vs. 22.0%, p < 0.001; 1.64 min ± 1.12vs. 3.34 min ± 1.28, p < 0.001). It also had increased accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision (100% vs. 58.8%, p < 0.001; 1.69 min ± 1.43 vs. 4.89 min ± 0.63, p < 0.001). In-the second study, the accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and time to reach this decision were comparable in each group (88.9% vs. 100% vs. 84.5%, p < 0.49; 2.2 min ± 2.2 vs. 2.7 min ± 2.1vs. 2.8 min ± 1.7, p = 0.68). In the third study, MSF group had higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision than the control (97.0% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001; 2.0 min ± 1.5 vs. 3.9 min ± 1.4; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that MSF use was independently associated with an accurate determination of the presence of a needle (OR 12.1, p < 0.001). Conclusions The use of MSF in this study’s RSS models facilitated the determination of presence and localization of RSS as shown by the increased rate of identification of a needle, decreased time to identification and higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle. This device may be used in conjunction with radiography as it gives live visual and auditory feedback for users during the search for RSS.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:07:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b4596e864d0c45c5be8e63d8e2243867
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1754-9493
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:07:45Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Patient Safety in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-b4596e864d0c45c5be8e63d8e22438672023-04-30T11:24:13ZengBMCPatient Safety in Surgery1754-94932023-04-011711810.1186/s13037-023-00359-8Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept studyHae Sung Kang0Jad Khoraki1Jessie Gie2Dielle Duval3Susan Haynes4Michael Siev5Jay Shah6Fernando Kim7Martin Mangino8Levi Procter9Riccardo Autorino10Samuel Weprin11Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University HealthDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University HealthDepartment of Urology, Stanford HealthDepartment of Urology, Graves Gilbert ClinicDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University HealthDepartment of Urology, Yale School of MedicineDepartment of Urology, Stanford HealthDepartment of Urology, University of ColoradoDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University HealthDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University HealthDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University HealthNew Jersey Urology, Summit HealthAbstract Background Retained surgical sharps (RSS) is a “never event” that is preventable but may still occur despite of correct count and negative X-ray. This study assesses the feasibility of a novel device (“Melzi Sharps Finder®” or MSF) in effective detection of RSS. Methods The first study consisted of determination of the presence of RSS or identification of RSS in an ex-vivo model (a container with hay in a laparoscopic trainer box). The second study consisted of determining presence of RSS in an in-vivo model (laparoscopy in live adult Yorkshire pigs) with 3 groups: C-arm, C-arm with MSF and MSF. The third study used similar apparatus though with laparotomy and included 2 groups: manual search and MSF. Results In the first study, the MSF group had a higher rate of identification of a needle and decreased time to locate a needle versus control (98.1% vs. 22.0%, p < 0.001; 1.64 min ± 1.12vs. 3.34 min ± 1.28, p < 0.001). It also had increased accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision (100% vs. 58.8%, p < 0.001; 1.69 min ± 1.43 vs. 4.89 min ± 0.63, p < 0.001). In-the second study, the accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and time to reach this decision were comparable in each group (88.9% vs. 100% vs. 84.5%, p < 0.49; 2.2 min ± 2.2 vs. 2.7 min ± 2.1vs. 2.8 min ± 1.7, p = 0.68). In the third study, MSF group had higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision than the control (97.0% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001; 2.0 min ± 1.5 vs. 3.9 min ± 1.4; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that MSF use was independently associated with an accurate determination of the presence of a needle (OR 12.1, p < 0.001). Conclusions The use of MSF in this study’s RSS models facilitated the determination of presence and localization of RSS as shown by the increased rate of identification of a needle, decreased time to identification and higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle. This device may be used in conjunction with radiography as it gives live visual and auditory feedback for users during the search for RSS.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00359-8Patient safetyRetained surgical sharpsMelzi Sharps FinderNever event
spellingShingle Hae Sung Kang
Jad Khoraki
Jessie Gie
Dielle Duval
Susan Haynes
Michael Siev
Jay Shah
Fernando Kim
Martin Mangino
Levi Procter
Riccardo Autorino
Samuel Weprin
Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study
Patient Safety in Surgery
Patient safety
Retained surgical sharps
Melzi Sharps Finder
Never event
title Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study
title_full Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study
title_fullStr Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study
title_full_unstemmed Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study
title_short Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study
title_sort multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps a proof of concept study
topic Patient safety
Retained surgical sharps
Melzi Sharps Finder
Never event
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00359-8
work_keys_str_mv AT haesungkang multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT jadkhoraki multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT jessiegie multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT dielleduval multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT susanhaynes multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT michaelsiev multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT jayshah multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT fernandokim multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT martinmangino multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT leviprocter multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT riccardoautorino multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy
AT samuelweprin multiphasepreclinicalassessmentofanoveldevicetolocateunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsaproofofconceptstudy