The role of platelet function analyzer-200 in predicting perioperative bleeding risk

Background/Aims Various preoperative screening tests, such as platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and bleeding time, have been widely used to evaluate the risk of bleeding during surgery. Use of platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100/200 for assessing platelet func...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eun Sang Yu, Min Ji Jeon, Ka-Won Kang, Byung-Hyun Lee, Eun Joo Kang, Yong Park, Se Ryeon Lee, Hwa Jung Sung, Chul Won Choi, Byung Soo Kim, Dae Sik Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2020-09-01
Series:The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kjim.org/upload/pdf/kjim-2019-112.pdf
_version_ 1818425960151646208
author Eun Sang Yu
Min Ji Jeon
Ka-Won Kang
Byung-Hyun Lee
Eun Joo Kang
Yong Park
Se Ryeon Lee
Hwa Jung Sung
Chul Won Choi
Byung Soo Kim
Dae Sik Kim
author_facet Eun Sang Yu
Min Ji Jeon
Ka-Won Kang
Byung-Hyun Lee
Eun Joo Kang
Yong Park
Se Ryeon Lee
Hwa Jung Sung
Chul Won Choi
Byung Soo Kim
Dae Sik Kim
author_sort Eun Sang Yu
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aims Various preoperative screening tests, such as platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and bleeding time, have been widely used to evaluate the risk of bleeding during surgery. Use of platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100/200 for assessing platelet function instead of bleeding time is increasing. However, its role in predicting the perioperative risk of bleeding remains controversial. Methods Data of 703 patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative platelet function was measured using PFA-200 system and the association with intraoperative bleeding was assessed. Additionally, other variables that could affect PFA-200 results were assessed by logistic regression analysis. Results Collagen/epinephrine (COL/EPI) test was prolonged in 199/703 (28.3%) patients (EPI group), while 99/212 (46.7%) patients showed COL/adenosine diphosphate test abnormalities. Bleeding over 300 mL during surgery occurred in 14.3% and 20.1% of patients in the normal and EPI groups, respectively (p = 0.058). In addition, red blood cell transfusion within 72 hours after surgery rate was significantly higher in the EPI group than in the normal group (31.7% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.024). In multivariate logistic analysis, prolongation closure time with COL/EPI (p = 0.068) was marginally associated with risk of bleeding during surgery. Furthermore, PFA-200 results were influenced by various factors, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, blood group, hematocrit, and time of blood collection. Conclusions Preoperative PFA-200 test may be helpful in predicting the risk of perioperative bleeding. However, its results should be carefully interpreted because they are affected by several factors.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T14:22:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b464a28a971f43efa080d5da0d5c97fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1226-3303
2005-6648
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T14:22:14Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
record_format Article
series The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b464a28a971f43efa080d5da0d5c97fc2022-12-21T22:58:03ZengThe Korean Association of Internal MedicineThe Korean Journal of Internal Medicine1226-33032005-66482020-09-013551199120910.3904/kjim.2019.112170300The role of platelet function analyzer-200 in predicting perioperative bleeding riskEun Sang Yu0Min Ji Jeon1Ka-Won Kang2Byung-Hyun Lee3Eun Joo Kang4Yong Park5Se Ryeon Lee6Hwa Jung Sung7Chul Won Choi8Byung Soo Kim9Dae Sik Kim10 Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, KoreaBackground/Aims Various preoperative screening tests, such as platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and bleeding time, have been widely used to evaluate the risk of bleeding during surgery. Use of platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100/200 for assessing platelet function instead of bleeding time is increasing. However, its role in predicting the perioperative risk of bleeding remains controversial. Methods Data of 703 patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative platelet function was measured using PFA-200 system and the association with intraoperative bleeding was assessed. Additionally, other variables that could affect PFA-200 results were assessed by logistic regression analysis. Results Collagen/epinephrine (COL/EPI) test was prolonged in 199/703 (28.3%) patients (EPI group), while 99/212 (46.7%) patients showed COL/adenosine diphosphate test abnormalities. Bleeding over 300 mL during surgery occurred in 14.3% and 20.1% of patients in the normal and EPI groups, respectively (p = 0.058). In addition, red blood cell transfusion within 72 hours after surgery rate was significantly higher in the EPI group than in the normal group (31.7% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.024). In multivariate logistic analysis, prolongation closure time with COL/EPI (p = 0.068) was marginally associated with risk of bleeding during surgery. Furthermore, PFA-200 results were influenced by various factors, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, blood group, hematocrit, and time of blood collection. Conclusions Preoperative PFA-200 test may be helpful in predicting the risk of perioperative bleeding. However, its results should be carefully interpreted because they are affected by several factors.http://www.kjim.org/upload/pdf/kjim-2019-112.pdfplatelet function analyzerbleedingsurgeryscreening test
spellingShingle Eun Sang Yu
Min Ji Jeon
Ka-Won Kang
Byung-Hyun Lee
Eun Joo Kang
Yong Park
Se Ryeon Lee
Hwa Jung Sung
Chul Won Choi
Byung Soo Kim
Dae Sik Kim
The role of platelet function analyzer-200 in predicting perioperative bleeding risk
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
platelet function analyzer
bleeding
surgery
screening test
title The role of platelet function analyzer-200 in predicting perioperative bleeding risk
title_full The role of platelet function analyzer-200 in predicting perioperative bleeding risk
title_fullStr The role of platelet function analyzer-200 in predicting perioperative bleeding risk
title_full_unstemmed The role of platelet function analyzer-200 in predicting perioperative bleeding risk
title_short The role of platelet function analyzer-200 in predicting perioperative bleeding risk
title_sort role of platelet function analyzer 200 in predicting perioperative bleeding risk
topic platelet function analyzer
bleeding
surgery
screening test
url http://www.kjim.org/upload/pdf/kjim-2019-112.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT eunsangyu theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT minjijeon theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT kawonkang theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT byunghyunlee theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT eunjookang theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT yongpark theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT seryeonlee theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT hwajungsung theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT chulwonchoi theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT byungsookim theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT daesikkim theroleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT eunsangyu roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT minjijeon roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT kawonkang roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT byunghyunlee roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT eunjookang roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT yongpark roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT seryeonlee roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT hwajungsung roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT chulwonchoi roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT byungsookim roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk
AT daesikkim roleofplateletfunctionanalyzer200inpredictingperioperativebleedingrisk