The use of pacemakers in infants and children

<p><strong>Background:</strong> To review retrospectively our experience with pediatric cardiac pacing with an emphasis on specific problems in pacemaker implantation in infants and children.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Between April 1977 and March 2005...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miro Kosin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Slovenian Medical Association 2005-12-01
Series:Zdravniški Vestnik
Subjects:
Online Access:http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2185
_version_ 1818539182580039680
author Miro Kosin
author_facet Miro Kosin
author_sort Miro Kosin
collection DOAJ
description <p><strong>Background:</strong> To review retrospectively our experience with pediatric cardiac pacing with an emphasis on specific problems in pacemaker implantation in infants and children.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Between April 1977 and March 2005 ninety-one child underwent permanent pacemaker implantation, 46 boys (50.5%) and 45 girls (49.5) with a mean age of 7.9 years (the oldest 17 years and the youngest 1 day). The age of the children at the time of implantation was 2 to 9 years in one half and 14 to 17 years in one fourth of them. Five children were younger than one month and three of them younger than one week. The indications for permanent pacing were complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) in more than half patients, sick sinus syndrome in one fourth and CAVB following open heart surgery in nine. The mean time for elective battery replacement was 6.5 years after the implantation. In one third of the children the battery was replaced before the end of the fifth year after the implantation and after seven years in more than half of the patients. Epicardial leads and left anterior thoracotomy or subxyphoid approach were used at the beginning. From the year 1980 we prefered transvenous leads. Modern epicardial steroideluting leads demonstrated relatively stable acute and chronic pacing and sensing tresholds. VVI/R pacemaker was the pacemaker of choice at the first implantation and we upgraded the pacing at the time of the elective battery replacement. Children with VDD pacemakers needed sometimes upgrading of pacing sooner because of the inappropriate atrial sensing and AV synchronyzation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Better quality pacing leads and smaller but more powerful pacemaker generators with autocapturecontrolled pacing options became more and more attractive for our little patients because of better implantation facilities, substantial energy savings and battery life prolongation.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:38:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b468864d7e124c6192c8ed6e91f82b13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1318-0347
1581-0224
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:38:40Z
publishDate 2005-12-01
publisher Slovenian Medical Association
record_format Article
series Zdravniški Vestnik
spelling doaj.art-b468864d7e124c6192c8ed6e91f82b132022-12-22T00:49:54ZengSlovenian Medical AssociationZdravniški Vestnik1318-03471581-02242005-12-017401671The use of pacemakers in infants and childrenMiro Kosin<p><strong>Background:</strong> To review retrospectively our experience with pediatric cardiac pacing with an emphasis on specific problems in pacemaker implantation in infants and children.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Between April 1977 and March 2005 ninety-one child underwent permanent pacemaker implantation, 46 boys (50.5%) and 45 girls (49.5) with a mean age of 7.9 years (the oldest 17 years and the youngest 1 day). The age of the children at the time of implantation was 2 to 9 years in one half and 14 to 17 years in one fourth of them. Five children were younger than one month and three of them younger than one week. The indications for permanent pacing were complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) in more than half patients, sick sinus syndrome in one fourth and CAVB following open heart surgery in nine. The mean time for elective battery replacement was 6.5 years after the implantation. In one third of the children the battery was replaced before the end of the fifth year after the implantation and after seven years in more than half of the patients. Epicardial leads and left anterior thoracotomy or subxyphoid approach were used at the beginning. From the year 1980 we prefered transvenous leads. Modern epicardial steroideluting leads demonstrated relatively stable acute and chronic pacing and sensing tresholds. VVI/R pacemaker was the pacemaker of choice at the first implantation and we upgraded the pacing at the time of the elective battery replacement. Children with VDD pacemakers needed sometimes upgrading of pacing sooner because of the inappropriate atrial sensing and AV synchronyzation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Better quality pacing leads and smaller but more powerful pacemaker generators with autocapturecontrolled pacing options became more and more attractive for our little patients because of better implantation facilities, substantial energy savings and battery life prolongation.</p>http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2185pacemakersinfants and childrencongenital heart defects
spellingShingle Miro Kosin
The use of pacemakers in infants and children
Zdravniški Vestnik
pacemakers
infants and children
congenital heart defects
title The use of pacemakers in infants and children
title_full The use of pacemakers in infants and children
title_fullStr The use of pacemakers in infants and children
title_full_unstemmed The use of pacemakers in infants and children
title_short The use of pacemakers in infants and children
title_sort use of pacemakers in infants and children
topic pacemakers
infants and children
congenital heart defects
url http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2185
work_keys_str_mv AT mirokosin theuseofpacemakersininfantsandchildren
AT mirokosin useofpacemakersininfantsandchildren