Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)

Abstract Soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127 (three‐event stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: MON 87708, MON 89788 and A5547‐127. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (EFSA GMO Panel), Hanspeter Naegeli, Jean‐Louis Bresson, Tamas Dalmay, Ian Crawford Dewhurst, Michele Epstein, Leslie George Firbank, Philippe Guerche, Jan Hejatko, Francisco Javier Moreno, Ewen Mullins, Fabien Nogué, Nils Rostoks, Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano, Giovanni Savoini, Eve Veromann, Fabio Veronesi, Fernando Álvarez, Antonio Fernandez Dumont, Nikoletta Papadopoulou, Michele Ardizzone, Yann Devos, Andrea Gennaro, Jose Ángel Ruiz Gómez, Anna Lanzoni, Franco Maria Neri, Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos, Tommaso Raffaello, Giacomo De Sanctis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-07-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5733
_version_ 1819035474403000320
author EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (EFSA GMO Panel)
Hanspeter Naegeli
Jean‐Louis Bresson
Tamas Dalmay
Ian Crawford Dewhurst
Michele Epstein
Leslie George Firbank
Philippe Guerche
Jan Hejatko
Francisco Javier Moreno
Ewen Mullins
Fabien Nogué
Nils Rostoks
Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano
Giovanni Savoini
Eve Veromann
Fabio Veronesi
Fernando Álvarez
Antonio Fernandez Dumont
Nikoletta Papadopoulou
Michele Ardizzone
Yann Devos
Andrea Gennaro
Jose Ángel Ruiz Gómez
Anna Lanzoni
Franco Maria Neri
Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos
Tommaso Raffaello
Giacomo De Sanctis
author_facet EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (EFSA GMO Panel)
Hanspeter Naegeli
Jean‐Louis Bresson
Tamas Dalmay
Ian Crawford Dewhurst
Michele Epstein
Leslie George Firbank
Philippe Guerche
Jan Hejatko
Francisco Javier Moreno
Ewen Mullins
Fabien Nogué
Nils Rostoks
Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano
Giovanni Savoini
Eve Veromann
Fabio Veronesi
Fernando Álvarez
Antonio Fernandez Dumont
Nikoletta Papadopoulou
Michele Ardizzone
Yann Devos
Andrea Gennaro
Jose Ángel Ruiz Gómez
Anna Lanzoni
Franco Maria Neri
Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos
Tommaso Raffaello
Giacomo De Sanctis
author_sort EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (EFSA GMO Panel)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127 (three‐event stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: MON 87708, MON 89788 and A5547‐127. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events, leading to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single soybean events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three‐event stack soybean does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack soybean, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. The nutritional impact of food/feed derived from the three‐event stack soybean is expected to be the same as that of food/feed derived from the conventional counterpart and non‐GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable seeds of the three‐event stack soybean into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the three‐event stack soybean. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack soybean is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T07:50:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b4703ac4801b4594ac6b1c6ba4d541c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1831-4732
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T07:50:12Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj.art-b4703ac4801b4594ac6b1c6ba4d541c02022-12-21T19:11:05ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322019-07-01177n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5733Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (EFSA GMO Panel)Hanspeter NaegeliJean‐Louis BressonTamas DalmayIan Crawford DewhurstMichele EpsteinLeslie George FirbankPhilippe GuercheJan HejatkoFrancisco Javier MorenoEwen MullinsFabien NoguéNils RostoksJose Juan Sánchez SerranoGiovanni SavoiniEve VeromannFabio VeronesiFernando ÁlvarezAntonio Fernandez DumontNikoletta PapadopoulouMichele ArdizzoneYann DevosAndrea GennaroJose Ángel Ruiz GómezAnna LanzoniFranco Maria NeriKonstantinos ParaskevopoulosTommaso RaffaelloGiacomo De SanctisAbstract Soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127 (three‐event stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: MON 87708, MON 89788 and A5547‐127. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events, leading to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single soybean events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three‐event stack soybean does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack soybean, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. The nutritional impact of food/feed derived from the three‐event stack soybean is expected to be the same as that of food/feed derived from the conventional counterpart and non‐GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable seeds of the three‐event stack soybean into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the three‐event stack soybean. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack soybean is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5733GMOsoybean (Glycine max)MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127Regulation (EC) 1829/2003DMOCP4 EPSPS
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (EFSA GMO Panel)
Hanspeter Naegeli
Jean‐Louis Bresson
Tamas Dalmay
Ian Crawford Dewhurst
Michele Epstein
Leslie George Firbank
Philippe Guerche
Jan Hejatko
Francisco Javier Moreno
Ewen Mullins
Fabien Nogué
Nils Rostoks
Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano
Giovanni Savoini
Eve Veromann
Fabio Veronesi
Fernando Álvarez
Antonio Fernandez Dumont
Nikoletta Papadopoulou
Michele Ardizzone
Yann Devos
Andrea Gennaro
Jose Ángel Ruiz Gómez
Anna Lanzoni
Franco Maria Neri
Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos
Tommaso Raffaello
Giacomo De Sanctis
Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
EFSA Journal
GMO
soybean (Glycine max)
MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127
Regulation (EC) 1829/2003
DMO
CP4 EPSPS
title Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified soybean mon 87708 mon 89788 a5547 127 for food and feed uses under regulation ec no 1829 2003 application efsa gmo nl 2016 135
topic GMO
soybean (Glycine max)
MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127
Regulation (EC) 1829/2003
DMO
CP4 EPSPS
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5733
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelongeneticallymodifiedorganismsefsagmopanel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT hanspeternaegeli assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT jeanlouisbresson assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT tamasdalmay assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT iancrawforddewhurst assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT micheleepstein assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT lesliegeorgefirbank assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT philippeguerche assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT janhejatko assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT franciscojaviermoreno assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT ewenmullins assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT fabiennogue assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT nilsrostoks assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT josejuansanchezserrano assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT giovannisavoini assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT eveveromann assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT fabioveronesi assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT fernandoalvarez assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT antoniofernandezdumont assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT nikolettapapadopoulou assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT micheleardizzone assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT yanndevos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT andreagennaro assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT joseangelruizgomez assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT annalanzoni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT francomarianeri assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT konstantinosparaskevopoulos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT tommasoraffaello assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT giacomodesanctis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135