A two-stage clustering approach to investigate lifestyle carbon footprints in two Australian cities

Given the key role of households in driving global emissions and resource use, a change in their consumption behaviours towards more sustainable levels is essential to reduce worldwide adverse environmental impacts. Thereby, focusing on cities is especially important because of today’s large share o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Froemelt, Thomas Wiedmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb502
_version_ 1797387078556712960
author Andreas Froemelt
Thomas Wiedmann
author_facet Andreas Froemelt
Thomas Wiedmann
author_sort Andreas Froemelt
collection DOAJ
description Given the key role of households in driving global emissions and resource use, a change in their consumption behaviours towards more sustainable levels is essential to reduce worldwide adverse environmental impacts. Thereby, focusing on cities is especially important because of today’s large share of the global population living in cities and because local authorities are close to the needs of their residents. However, devising targeted and effective policy measures implies a thorough understanding of prevailing consumption patterns and associated environmental consequences. The goal of this article is to investigate and compare household behaviours and lifestyle-induced carbon footprints in Sydney and Melbourne in order to enhance today’s understanding of household consumption in cities of a high-income, high-emission country. For this purpose, we employed a two-stage clustering approach with a Self-Organising Map and a subsequent Ward-clustering. This allowed for including expenditure data along with socio-economic attributes and thus for recognising lifestyle-archetypes. These emerging archetypes represent households with similar characteristics and comparable consumption patterns. Analysing the archetypes in detail and performing a city-comparison based on multi-dimensional scaling revealed similarities and dissimilarities between the two metropoles. ‘Older’ archetypes seem to behave more alike across cities but show different carbon footprints emphasising the importance of regionalised environmental assessments and of city-specific supply chains. Distinct patterns especially emerged in the high- and low-income segments highlighting the different importance of different lifestyles in each city. Socio-economically similar family-archetypes were found in both cities, but some of them showed diverging consumption behaviours. This article showed that studying household-induced environmental impacts in cities should not rely on macro-trends but should rather be based on city-specific analyses that capture local peculiarities and consider socio-economic characteristics and consumption data simultaneously.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T22:18:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b472e5ec52db4647aecdfab776893299
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T22:18:38Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-b472e5ec52db4647aecdfab7768932992023-12-18T17:33:33ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262020-01-01151010409610.1088/1748-9326/abb502A two-stage clustering approach to investigate lifestyle carbon footprints in two Australian citiesAndreas Froemelt0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9388-7816Thomas Wiedmann1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6395-8887Sustainability Assessment Program, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW , Sydney, NSW, AustraliaSustainability Assessment Program, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW , Sydney, NSW, AustraliaGiven the key role of households in driving global emissions and resource use, a change in their consumption behaviours towards more sustainable levels is essential to reduce worldwide adverse environmental impacts. Thereby, focusing on cities is especially important because of today’s large share of the global population living in cities and because local authorities are close to the needs of their residents. However, devising targeted and effective policy measures implies a thorough understanding of prevailing consumption patterns and associated environmental consequences. The goal of this article is to investigate and compare household behaviours and lifestyle-induced carbon footprints in Sydney and Melbourne in order to enhance today’s understanding of household consumption in cities of a high-income, high-emission country. For this purpose, we employed a two-stage clustering approach with a Self-Organising Map and a subsequent Ward-clustering. This allowed for including expenditure data along with socio-economic attributes and thus for recognising lifestyle-archetypes. These emerging archetypes represent households with similar characteristics and comparable consumption patterns. Analysing the archetypes in detail and performing a city-comparison based on multi-dimensional scaling revealed similarities and dissimilarities between the two metropoles. ‘Older’ archetypes seem to behave more alike across cities but show different carbon footprints emphasising the importance of regionalised environmental assessments and of city-specific supply chains. Distinct patterns especially emerged in the high- and low-income segments highlighting the different importance of different lifestyles in each city. Socio-economically similar family-archetypes were found in both cities, but some of them showed diverging consumption behaviours. This article showed that studying household-induced environmental impacts in cities should not rely on macro-trends but should rather be based on city-specific analyses that capture local peculiarities and consider socio-economic characteristics and consumption data simultaneously.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb502household consumptioncarbon footprintdata mininginput-output life cycle assessmenturban households
spellingShingle Andreas Froemelt
Thomas Wiedmann
A two-stage clustering approach to investigate lifestyle carbon footprints in two Australian cities
Environmental Research Letters
household consumption
carbon footprint
data mining
input-output life cycle assessment
urban households
title A two-stage clustering approach to investigate lifestyle carbon footprints in two Australian cities
title_full A two-stage clustering approach to investigate lifestyle carbon footprints in two Australian cities
title_fullStr A two-stage clustering approach to investigate lifestyle carbon footprints in two Australian cities
title_full_unstemmed A two-stage clustering approach to investigate lifestyle carbon footprints in two Australian cities
title_short A two-stage clustering approach to investigate lifestyle carbon footprints in two Australian cities
title_sort two stage clustering approach to investigate lifestyle carbon footprints in two australian cities
topic household consumption
carbon footprint
data mining
input-output life cycle assessment
urban households
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb502
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasfroemelt atwostageclusteringapproachtoinvestigatelifestylecarbonfootprintsintwoaustraliancities
AT thomaswiedmann atwostageclusteringapproachtoinvestigatelifestylecarbonfootprintsintwoaustraliancities
AT andreasfroemelt twostageclusteringapproachtoinvestigatelifestylecarbonfootprintsintwoaustraliancities
AT thomaswiedmann twostageclusteringapproachtoinvestigatelifestylecarbonfootprintsintwoaustraliancities