A human factors perspective on how to keep SAE Level 3 conditional automated driving safe
The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) defines Conditional Automated Driving (CAD) or SAE level 3 as the next step in the transition to higher automated driving. A human factors challenge at this level is to keep the fallback-ready user aware of the driving situation. The problem with the widely...
Main Authors: | Michael A. Gerber, Ronald Schroeter, Bonnie Ho |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198223002063 |
Similar Items
-
How to Counteract Driver Fatigue during Conditional Automated Driving—A Systematic Review
by: Alexandra Loew, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Drivers’ usage of driving automation systems in different contexts: A survey in China, Germany, Spain and USA
by: MariAnne Karlsson, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
Why Does the Automation Say One Thing but Does Something Else? Effect of the Feedback Consistency and the Timing of Error on Trust in Automated Driving
by: J. B. Manchon, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Beyond the hype: A critical look at the motivations driving automated driving systems research
by: Erik Almlöf
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Determining Key Parameters with Data-Assisted Analysis of Conditionally Automated Driving
by: Timotej Gruden, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)