Comparison of the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques on functional outcomes in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy

Abstract Purpose To compare the correction angles determined by the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques in patients treated with medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and show their impact on clinical outcomes. Methods Seventy‐four patients constituted the study group. The correction angles in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ümit Aygün, Murat Bölükbaşı, Kamil Yamak, Ali Can Çiçek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00653-5
_version_ 1797270792627552256
author Ümit Aygün
Murat Bölükbaşı
Kamil Yamak
Ali Can Çiçek
author_facet Ümit Aygün
Murat Bölükbaşı
Kamil Yamak
Ali Can Çiçek
author_sort Ümit Aygün
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose To compare the correction angles determined by the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques in patients treated with medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and show their impact on clinical outcomes. Methods Seventy‐four patients constituted the study group. The correction angles in Group 1 were measured using the Miniaci technique, and those in Group 2 were measured using the Dugdale technique. The clinical evaluations included the Tinetti Gait and Balance Assessment (TGBA), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The effect of the correction angle on the patient's clinical outcomes was evaluated. Measurement techniques were also changed between groups for comparison. Results Seventy‐four patients (62 females, 12 males) with a mean age of 53.7 ± 4.9 years were followed up for a mean of 67.4 ± 5.5 months. The TGBA, WOMAC, and VAS scores were improved at the last follow‐up compared to the preoperative scores (p < 0.05). The preoperative TGBA and WOMAC scores were not significantly different between the two groups, but the last follow‐up TGBA and WOMAC scores in Group 2 were worse than those in Group 1 (p < 0.05). When measuring techniques were changed, the preoperative correction angle (PCA) value and the last follow‐up correction angle (LFCA) value were lower in Group 1 measured with the Dugdale technique but higher in Group 2 measured with the Miniaci technique (p < 0.05). Conclusion Since the correction angle values measured with the Miniaci technique in MOWHTO are higher than those measured with the Dugdale technique; the functional results are better. Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, III.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T02:09:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b47dc0af4c084010898602a6aafdc3ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-1153
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T02:09:54Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-b47dc0af4c084010898602a6aafdc3ca2024-03-07T12:46:42ZengWileyJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics2197-11532023-01-01101n/an/a10.1186/s40634-023-00653-5Comparison of the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques on functional outcomes in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomyÜmit Aygün0Murat Bölükbaşı1Kamil Yamak2Ali Can Çiçek3Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyAğrı İbrahim Çeçen UniversityAğrıTürkiyeDepartment of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyVM Medical Park Samsun HospitalSamsunTürkiyeBuca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research HospitalOrthopedics and Traumatology ClinicİzmirTürkiyeAğrı Training and Research HospitalOrthopaedics and Traumatology ClinicAğrıTürkiyeAbstract Purpose To compare the correction angles determined by the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques in patients treated with medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and show their impact on clinical outcomes. Methods Seventy‐four patients constituted the study group. The correction angles in Group 1 were measured using the Miniaci technique, and those in Group 2 were measured using the Dugdale technique. The clinical evaluations included the Tinetti Gait and Balance Assessment (TGBA), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The effect of the correction angle on the patient's clinical outcomes was evaluated. Measurement techniques were also changed between groups for comparison. Results Seventy‐four patients (62 females, 12 males) with a mean age of 53.7 ± 4.9 years were followed up for a mean of 67.4 ± 5.5 months. The TGBA, WOMAC, and VAS scores were improved at the last follow‐up compared to the preoperative scores (p < 0.05). The preoperative TGBA and WOMAC scores were not significantly different between the two groups, but the last follow‐up TGBA and WOMAC scores in Group 2 were worse than those in Group 1 (p < 0.05). When measuring techniques were changed, the preoperative correction angle (PCA) value and the last follow‐up correction angle (LFCA) value were lower in Group 1 measured with the Dugdale technique but higher in Group 2 measured with the Miniaci technique (p < 0.05). Conclusion Since the correction angle values measured with the Miniaci technique in MOWHTO are higher than those measured with the Dugdale technique; the functional results are better. Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, III.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00653-5High tibial osteotomyMedial open wedgeCorrection angleMiniaci techniqueDugdale techniqueMeasurement
spellingShingle Ümit Aygün
Murat Bölükbaşı
Kamil Yamak
Ali Can Çiçek
Comparison of the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques on functional outcomes in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
High tibial osteotomy
Medial open wedge
Correction angle
Miniaci technique
Dugdale technique
Measurement
title Comparison of the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques on functional outcomes in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy
title_full Comparison of the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques on functional outcomes in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy
title_fullStr Comparison of the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques on functional outcomes in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques on functional outcomes in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy
title_short Comparison of the Miniaci and Dugdale techniques on functional outcomes in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy
title_sort comparison of the miniaci and dugdale techniques on functional outcomes in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy
topic High tibial osteotomy
Medial open wedge
Correction angle
Miniaci technique
Dugdale technique
Measurement
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00653-5
work_keys_str_mv AT umitaygun comparisonoftheminiacianddugdaletechniquesonfunctionaloutcomesinmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomy
AT muratbolukbası comparisonoftheminiacianddugdaletechniquesonfunctionaloutcomesinmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomy
AT kamilyamak comparisonoftheminiacianddugdaletechniquesonfunctionaloutcomesinmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomy
AT alicancicek comparisonoftheminiacianddugdaletechniquesonfunctionaloutcomesinmedialopenwedgehightibialosteotomy