Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wen-Ling Zhao,1 Xiao-Feng Ou,1 Jin Liu,1,2 Wen-Sheng Zhang1,2 1Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Translational Neuroscience Centre, 2Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China Background: Dexamethasone is a common adjuvant for local anest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao WL, Ou XF, Liu J, Zhang WS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-07-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/perineural-versus-intravenous-dexamethasone-as-an-adjuvant-in-regional-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
_version_ 1811238925740539904
author Zhao WL
Ou XF
Liu J
Zhang WS
author_facet Zhao WL
Ou XF
Liu J
Zhang WS
author_sort Zhao WL
collection DOAJ
description Wen-Ling Zhao,1 Xiao-Feng Ou,1 Jin Liu,1,2 Wen-Sheng Zhang1,2 1Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Translational Neuroscience Centre, 2Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China Background: Dexamethasone is a common adjuvant for local anesthetics in regional anesthesia, but the optimal route of administration is controversial. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone on local anesthetic regional nerve-blockade outcomes.Materials and methods: Medline (through PubMed), Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Biosis Previews databases were systematically searched (published from inception of each database to January 1, 2017) to identify randomized controlled trials. The data of the selected trials were statistically analyzed to find any significant differences between the two modalities. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included duration of motor block, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative analgesic dose at 24 hours. We conducted a planned subgroup analysis to compare the effects between adding epinephrine or not.Results: Ten randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria of our analysis, with a total of 749 patients. Without the addition of epinephrine, the effects of perineural and intravenous dexamethasone were equivalent concerning the duration of analgesia (mean difference 0.03 hours, 95% CI –0.17 to 0.24). However, with the addition of epinephrine, the analgesic duration of perineural dexamethasone versus intravenous dexamethasone was prolonged (mean difference 3.96 hours, 95% CI 2.66–5.27). Likewise, the impact of epinephrine was the same on the duration of motor block. The two routes of administration did not show any significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, nor on postoperative analgesic consumption at 24 hours.Conclusion: Our results show that perineural dexamethasone can prolong the effects of analgesic duration when compared to the intravenous route, only when epinephrine is coadministered. Without epinephrine, the two modalities show equivalent effect as adjuvants on regional anesthesia. Keywords: anesthesia adjuvants, dexamethasone, regional anesthesia
first_indexed 2024-04-12T12:50:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b48874dbf8a7453e861c2e74a663fd3e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-7090
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T12:50:51Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Pain Research
spelling doaj.art-b48874dbf8a7453e861c2e74a663fd3e2022-12-22T03:32:29ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902017-07-01Volume 101529154333589Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysisZhao WLOu XFLiu JZhang WSWen-Ling Zhao,1 Xiao-Feng Ou,1 Jin Liu,1,2 Wen-Sheng Zhang1,2 1Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Translational Neuroscience Centre, 2Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China Background: Dexamethasone is a common adjuvant for local anesthetics in regional anesthesia, but the optimal route of administration is controversial. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone on local anesthetic regional nerve-blockade outcomes.Materials and methods: Medline (through PubMed), Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Biosis Previews databases were systematically searched (published from inception of each database to January 1, 2017) to identify randomized controlled trials. The data of the selected trials were statistically analyzed to find any significant differences between the two modalities. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes included duration of motor block, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative analgesic dose at 24 hours. We conducted a planned subgroup analysis to compare the effects between adding epinephrine or not.Results: Ten randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria of our analysis, with a total of 749 patients. Without the addition of epinephrine, the effects of perineural and intravenous dexamethasone were equivalent concerning the duration of analgesia (mean difference 0.03 hours, 95% CI –0.17 to 0.24). However, with the addition of epinephrine, the analgesic duration of perineural dexamethasone versus intravenous dexamethasone was prolonged (mean difference 3.96 hours, 95% CI 2.66–5.27). Likewise, the impact of epinephrine was the same on the duration of motor block. The two routes of administration did not show any significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, nor on postoperative analgesic consumption at 24 hours.Conclusion: Our results show that perineural dexamethasone can prolong the effects of analgesic duration when compared to the intravenous route, only when epinephrine is coadministered. Without epinephrine, the two modalities show equivalent effect as adjuvants on regional anesthesia. Keywords: anesthesia adjuvants, dexamethasone, regional anesthesiahttps://www.dovepress.com/perineural-versus-intravenous-dexamethasone-as-an-adjuvant-in-regional-peer-reviewed-article-JPRanesthesia adjuvantsdexamethasoneregional anesthesia
spellingShingle Zhao WL
Ou XF
Liu J
Zhang WS
Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of Pain Research
anesthesia adjuvants
dexamethasone
regional anesthesia
title Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia a systematic review and meta analysis
topic anesthesia adjuvants
dexamethasone
regional anesthesia
url https://www.dovepress.com/perineural-versus-intravenous-dexamethasone-as-an-adjuvant-in-regional-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaowl perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ouxf perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuj perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangws perineuralversusintravenousdexamethasoneasanadjuvantinregionalanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis