Thin Arctic sea ice in L-band observations and an ocean reanalysis
L-band radiance measurements of the Earth's surface such as those from the SMOS satellite can be used to retrieve the thickness of thin sea ice in the range 0–1 m under cold surface conditions. However, retrieval uncertainties can be large due to assumptions in the forward model, which conve...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-06-01
|
| Series: | The Cryosphere |
| Online Access: | https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/2051/2018/tc-12-2051-2018.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818427131617607680 |
|---|---|
| author | S. Tietsche M. Alonso-Balmaseda P. Rosnay H. Zuo X. Tian-Kunze L. Kaleschke L. Kaleschke |
| author_facet | S. Tietsche M. Alonso-Balmaseda P. Rosnay H. Zuo X. Tian-Kunze L. Kaleschke L. Kaleschke |
| author_sort | S. Tietsche |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | L-band radiance measurements of the Earth's surface such as those from the
SMOS satellite can be used to retrieve the thickness of thin sea ice in the
range 0–1 m under cold surface conditions. However, retrieval uncertainties
can be large due to assumptions in the forward model, which converts
brightness temperatures into ice thickness and due to uncertainties in
auxiliary fields which need to be independently modelled or observed. It is
therefore advisable to perform a critical assessment with independent
observational and model data before using sea-ice thickness products from
L-band radiometry for model validation or data assimilation. Here, we discuss
version 3.1 of the University of Hamburg SMOS sea-ice thickness data set
(SMOS-SIT) from autumn 2011 to autumn 2017 and compare it to the global ocean
reanalysis ORAS5, which does not assimilate the SMOS-SIT data. ORAS5
currently provides the ocean and sea-ice initial conditions for all coupled
weather, monthly and seasonal forecasts issued by ECMWF. It is concluded that
SMOS-SIT provides valuable and unique information on thin sea ice during
winter and can under certain conditions be used to expose deficiencies in the
reanalysis. Overall, there is a promising match between sea-ice thicknesses
from ORAS5 and SMOS-SIT early in the freezing season (October–December),
while later in winter, sea ice is consistently modelled thicker than
observed. This is mostly attributable to refrozen polynyas and fracture
zones, which are poorly represented in ORAS5 but easily detected by SMOS-SIT.
However, there are other regions like Baffin Bay, where biases in the
observational data seem to be substantial, as comparisons with independent
observational data suggest. Despite considerable uncertainties and
discrepancies between thin sea ice in SMOS-SIT and ORAS5 on local scales,
interannual variability and trends of its large-scale distribution are in
good agreement. This gives some confidence in our current ability to monitor
climate variability and change in thin sea ice. With further improvements in
retrieval methods, forecast models and data assimilation methods, the huge
potential of L-band radiometry to derive the thickness of thin sea ice in
winter will be realised and will provide an important building block for
improved predictions in polar regions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T14:40:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b48a629b96ab415ca5e2b1bb1dfe5198 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1994-0416 1994-0424 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T14:40:51Z |
| publishDate | 2018-06-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Cryosphere |
| spelling | doaj.art-b48a629b96ab415ca5e2b1bb1dfe51982022-12-21T22:57:25ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242018-06-01122051207210.5194/tc-12-2051-2018Thin Arctic sea ice in L-band observations and an ocean reanalysisS. Tietsche0M. Alonso-Balmaseda1P. Rosnay2H. Zuo3X. Tian-Kunze4L. Kaleschke5L. Kaleschke6European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UKEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UKEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UKEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UKInstitute of Oceanography, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Oceanography, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germanynow at: Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, GermanyL-band radiance measurements of the Earth's surface such as those from the SMOS satellite can be used to retrieve the thickness of thin sea ice in the range 0–1 m under cold surface conditions. However, retrieval uncertainties can be large due to assumptions in the forward model, which converts brightness temperatures into ice thickness and due to uncertainties in auxiliary fields which need to be independently modelled or observed. It is therefore advisable to perform a critical assessment with independent observational and model data before using sea-ice thickness products from L-band radiometry for model validation or data assimilation. Here, we discuss version 3.1 of the University of Hamburg SMOS sea-ice thickness data set (SMOS-SIT) from autumn 2011 to autumn 2017 and compare it to the global ocean reanalysis ORAS5, which does not assimilate the SMOS-SIT data. ORAS5 currently provides the ocean and sea-ice initial conditions for all coupled weather, monthly and seasonal forecasts issued by ECMWF. It is concluded that SMOS-SIT provides valuable and unique information on thin sea ice during winter and can under certain conditions be used to expose deficiencies in the reanalysis. Overall, there is a promising match between sea-ice thicknesses from ORAS5 and SMOS-SIT early in the freezing season (October–December), while later in winter, sea ice is consistently modelled thicker than observed. This is mostly attributable to refrozen polynyas and fracture zones, which are poorly represented in ORAS5 but easily detected by SMOS-SIT. However, there are other regions like Baffin Bay, where biases in the observational data seem to be substantial, as comparisons with independent observational data suggest. Despite considerable uncertainties and discrepancies between thin sea ice in SMOS-SIT and ORAS5 on local scales, interannual variability and trends of its large-scale distribution are in good agreement. This gives some confidence in our current ability to monitor climate variability and change in thin sea ice. With further improvements in retrieval methods, forecast models and data assimilation methods, the huge potential of L-band radiometry to derive the thickness of thin sea ice in winter will be realised and will provide an important building block for improved predictions in polar regions.https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/2051/2018/tc-12-2051-2018.pdf |
| spellingShingle | S. Tietsche M. Alonso-Balmaseda P. Rosnay H. Zuo X. Tian-Kunze L. Kaleschke L. Kaleschke Thin Arctic sea ice in L-band observations and an ocean reanalysis The Cryosphere |
| title | Thin Arctic sea ice in L-band observations and an ocean reanalysis |
| title_full | Thin Arctic sea ice in L-band observations and an ocean reanalysis |
| title_fullStr | Thin Arctic sea ice in L-band observations and an ocean reanalysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Thin Arctic sea ice in L-band observations and an ocean reanalysis |
| title_short | Thin Arctic sea ice in L-band observations and an ocean reanalysis |
| title_sort | thin arctic sea ice in l band observations and an ocean reanalysis |
| url | https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/2051/2018/tc-12-2051-2018.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stietsche thinarcticseaiceinlbandobservationsandanoceanreanalysis AT malonsobalmaseda thinarcticseaiceinlbandobservationsandanoceanreanalysis AT prosnay thinarcticseaiceinlbandobservationsandanoceanreanalysis AT hzuo thinarcticseaiceinlbandobservationsandanoceanreanalysis AT xtiankunze thinarcticseaiceinlbandobservationsandanoceanreanalysis AT lkaleschke thinarcticseaiceinlbandobservationsandanoceanreanalysis AT lkaleschke thinarcticseaiceinlbandobservationsandanoceanreanalysis |