A Comparison of Fresh and Frozen Lamb Meat—Differences in Technological Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes

Technological meat quality and sensory attributes of fresh and frozen lamb meat were compared. Samples were collected from two abattoirs (one small-scale, one large-scale) that use different slaughter methods in terms of chilling regime and electrical stimulation. The fresh and frozen meat samples i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elin Stenberg, Katarina Arvidsson-Segerkvist, Anders H. Karlsson, Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir, Óli Þór Hilmarsson, María Gudjónsdóttir, Guðjón Thorkelsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/20/2830
_version_ 1827652174869430272
author Elin Stenberg
Katarina Arvidsson-Segerkvist
Anders H. Karlsson
Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir
Óli Þór Hilmarsson
María Gudjónsdóttir
Guðjón Thorkelsson
author_facet Elin Stenberg
Katarina Arvidsson-Segerkvist
Anders H. Karlsson
Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir
Óli Þór Hilmarsson
María Gudjónsdóttir
Guðjón Thorkelsson
author_sort Elin Stenberg
collection DOAJ
description Technological meat quality and sensory attributes of fresh and frozen lamb meat were compared. Samples were collected from two abattoirs (one small-scale, one large-scale) that use different slaughter methods in terms of chilling regime and electrical stimulation. The fresh and frozen meat samples included products from both slaughter systems. Ten twin pairs of ram lambs were used in the study, with one of each twin slaughtered at each abattoir. Fresh meat was analysed after chilling and frozen meat was stored frozen for three months and analysed after thawing. The <i>Musculus longissimus thoracis et lumborum</i> was analysed for colour, cooking loss, sensory attributes, Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and distribution of water and lipid within each meat sample. Meat samples analysed after frozen storage were darker, less red and more yellow than the fresh meat. Freezing and frozen storage increased fluid loss and WBSF compared with the fresh meat, due to protein denaturation. Frozen storage affected sensory attributes by increasing fatty odour, frying flavour, sour flavour, fatty flavour and liver flavour, and by reducing juicy texture and mushy texture.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T20:51:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b495f31b357048048f85b74d6ec33ed2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T20:51:50Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-b495f31b357048048f85b74d6ec33ed22023-11-23T22:32:35ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152022-10-011220283010.3390/ani12202830A Comparison of Fresh and Frozen Lamb Meat—Differences in Technological Meat Quality and Sensory AttributesElin Stenberg0Katarina Arvidsson-Segerkvist1Anders H. Karlsson2Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir3Óli Þór Hilmarsson4María Gudjónsdóttir5Guðjón Thorkelsson6Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, 53223 Skara, SwedenDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, 53223 Skara, SwedenDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, 53223 Skara, SwedenMatís Ohf, Vínlandsleið 12, 113 Reykjavík, IcelandMatís Ohf, Vínlandsleið 12, 113 Reykjavík, IcelandMatís Ohf, Vínlandsleið 12, 113 Reykjavík, IcelandMatís Ohf, Vínlandsleið 12, 113 Reykjavík, IcelandTechnological meat quality and sensory attributes of fresh and frozen lamb meat were compared. Samples were collected from two abattoirs (one small-scale, one large-scale) that use different slaughter methods in terms of chilling regime and electrical stimulation. The fresh and frozen meat samples included products from both slaughter systems. Ten twin pairs of ram lambs were used in the study, with one of each twin slaughtered at each abattoir. Fresh meat was analysed after chilling and frozen meat was stored frozen for three months and analysed after thawing. The <i>Musculus longissimus thoracis et lumborum</i> was analysed for colour, cooking loss, sensory attributes, Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and distribution of water and lipid within each meat sample. Meat samples analysed after frozen storage were darker, less red and more yellow than the fresh meat. Freezing and frozen storage increased fluid loss and WBSF compared with the fresh meat, due to protein denaturation. Frozen storage affected sensory attributes by increasing fatty odour, frying flavour, sour flavour, fatty flavour and liver flavour, and by reducing juicy texture and mushy texture.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/20/2830meat colourcooking lossWarner-Bratzler shear forcetendernessodourtexture
spellingShingle Elin Stenberg
Katarina Arvidsson-Segerkvist
Anders H. Karlsson
Aðalheiður Ólafsdóttir
Óli Þór Hilmarsson
María Gudjónsdóttir
Guðjón Thorkelsson
A Comparison of Fresh and Frozen Lamb Meat—Differences in Technological Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes
Animals
meat colour
cooking loss
Warner-Bratzler shear force
tenderness
odour
texture
title A Comparison of Fresh and Frozen Lamb Meat—Differences in Technological Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes
title_full A Comparison of Fresh and Frozen Lamb Meat—Differences in Technological Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes
title_fullStr A Comparison of Fresh and Frozen Lamb Meat—Differences in Technological Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Fresh and Frozen Lamb Meat—Differences in Technological Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes
title_short A Comparison of Fresh and Frozen Lamb Meat—Differences in Technological Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes
title_sort comparison of fresh and frozen lamb meat differences in technological meat quality and sensory attributes
topic meat colour
cooking loss
Warner-Bratzler shear force
tenderness
odour
texture
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/20/2830
work_keys_str_mv AT elinstenberg acomparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT katarinaarvidssonsegerkvist acomparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT andershkarlsson acomparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT aðalheiðurolafsdottir acomparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT oliþorhilmarsson acomparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT mariagudjonsdottir acomparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT guðjonthorkelsson acomparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT elinstenberg comparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT katarinaarvidssonsegerkvist comparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT andershkarlsson comparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT aðalheiðurolafsdottir comparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT oliþorhilmarsson comparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT mariagudjonsdottir comparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes
AT guðjonthorkelsson comparisonoffreshandfrozenlambmeatdifferencesintechnologicalmeatqualityandsensoryattributes