The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation
Abstract Background The Client Satisfaction with Devices (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey is an extensively used questionnaire that measures patients’ satisfaction with orthosis and prosthesis. However, the validated version for Arabic speakers (CSD-Ar) is only applicable...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01773-1 |
_version_ | 1818561754945290240 |
---|---|
author | Hadeel R. Bakhsh Nilüfer Kablan Walaa Alammar Yaşar Tatar Giorgio Ferriero |
author_facet | Hadeel R. Bakhsh Nilüfer Kablan Walaa Alammar Yaşar Tatar Giorgio Ferriero |
author_sort | Hadeel R. Bakhsh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The Client Satisfaction with Devices (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey is an extensively used questionnaire that measures patients’ satisfaction with orthosis and prosthesis. However, the validated version for Arabic speakers (CSD-Ar) is only applicable for orthosis users. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the CSD-Ar for prosthetics users. Methods The study used a convenience sample of prosthesis users from Saudi Arabia and Turkey (N = 183), who completed the CSD-Ar. The collected data were analysed using Rasch analysis to evaluate item fit, reliability indices, item difficulty, local item dependency, and differential item functioning (DIF) using WINSTEPS version 4.6.1. Results Based on the analysis, the four-response Likert-scale was acceptable, as shown by the category functioning test, All eight items did achieve a fit to the Rasch Model [(infit) and (outfit) mean-square 0.75 to 1.3]. Person separation reliability was 0.76, and item separation reliability was 0.94. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed satisfactory unidimensionality and no local item dependency. The DIF analysis showed no notable dependency among items on participant characteristics in terms of age, gender, duration of use, country, and level of amputation. Conclusion This study contributes to the confidence of using CSD-Ar to evaluate users’ satisfaction with different prostheses, affirming the need for further refinement of the quality of the outcome measure. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T00:54:57Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b4a772adea6741c78831773886baf8fd |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1477-7525 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T00:54:57Z |
publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
spelling | doaj.art-b4a772adea6741c78831773886baf8fd2022-12-21T23:23:38ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252021-04-011911910.1186/s12955-021-01773-1The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputationHadeel R. Bakhsh0Nilüfer Kablan1Walaa Alammar2Yaşar Tatar3Giorgio Ferriero4Department of Rehabilitation, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityDepartment of Rehabilitation, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman UniversityFaculty of Sports Sciences, Marmara ÜniversityPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Scientific Institute of Tradate, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCSAbstract Background The Client Satisfaction with Devices (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey is an extensively used questionnaire that measures patients’ satisfaction with orthosis and prosthesis. However, the validated version for Arabic speakers (CSD-Ar) is only applicable for orthosis users. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the CSD-Ar for prosthetics users. Methods The study used a convenience sample of prosthesis users from Saudi Arabia and Turkey (N = 183), who completed the CSD-Ar. The collected data were analysed using Rasch analysis to evaluate item fit, reliability indices, item difficulty, local item dependency, and differential item functioning (DIF) using WINSTEPS version 4.6.1. Results Based on the analysis, the four-response Likert-scale was acceptable, as shown by the category functioning test, All eight items did achieve a fit to the Rasch Model [(infit) and (outfit) mean-square 0.75 to 1.3]. Person separation reliability was 0.76, and item separation reliability was 0.94. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed satisfactory unidimensionality and no local item dependency. The DIF analysis showed no notable dependency among items on participant characteristics in terms of age, gender, duration of use, country, and level of amputation. Conclusion This study contributes to the confidence of using CSD-Ar to evaluate users’ satisfaction with different prostheses, affirming the need for further refinement of the quality of the outcome measure.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01773-1Rasch analysisProsthesisPatient satisfactionPsychometricsRehabilitation |
spellingShingle | Hadeel R. Bakhsh Nilüfer Kablan Walaa Alammar Yaşar Tatar Giorgio Ferriero The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation Health and Quality of Life Outcomes Rasch analysis Prosthesis Patient satisfaction Psychometrics Rehabilitation |
title | The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation |
title_full | The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation |
title_fullStr | The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation |
title_full_unstemmed | The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation |
title_short | The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation |
title_sort | client satisfaction with device a rasch validation of the arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation |
topic | Rasch analysis Prosthesis Patient satisfaction Psychometrics Rehabilitation |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01773-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hadeelrbakhsh theclientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation AT niluferkablan theclientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation AT walaaalammar theclientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation AT yasartatar theclientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation AT giorgioferriero theclientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation AT hadeelrbakhsh clientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation AT niluferkablan clientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation AT walaaalammar clientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation AT yasartatar clientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation AT giorgioferriero clientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation |