Validating the Whistleblowing Maturity Model Using the Delphi Method

Empirical research identifies whistleblowing as one of the most effective internal antifraud controls. Very recently, Directive 1937/2019 became effective in the EU, aiming to deal with the defragmentation of whistleblowing legislation among the member states and provide common minimum accepted stan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paschalis Kagias, Nikolaos Sariannidis, Alexandros Garefalakis, Ioannis Passas, Panagiotis Kyriakogkonas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/5/120
_version_ 1797818868338524160
author Paschalis Kagias
Nikolaos Sariannidis
Alexandros Garefalakis
Ioannis Passas
Panagiotis Kyriakogkonas
author_facet Paschalis Kagias
Nikolaos Sariannidis
Alexandros Garefalakis
Ioannis Passas
Panagiotis Kyriakogkonas
author_sort Paschalis Kagias
collection DOAJ
description Empirical research identifies whistleblowing as one of the most effective internal antifraud controls. Very recently, Directive 1937/2019 became effective in the EU, aiming to deal with the defragmentation of whistleblowing legislation among the member states and provide common minimum accepted standards. The present article aims to provide a verified, weighted comparative maturity model. The suggested model has been constructed based on the methodology for constructing comparative maturity models and validated based on the Delphi method. The weights on each validated component have been calculated based on the summing of votes method. The study resulted in eight main components «scope», «corporate governance», «reporting mechanisms», «protection», «tone at the top», «organizational and human resource practices», «investigations» and «monitor and review» divided further into 18 elements. The suggested maturity model may provide a pathway for organizations to develop and maintain a robust whistleblowing maturity framework that will benefit both the organizations and the public welfare.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:14:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b4cefe49ebfb47b681e570098f7c9769
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3387
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:14:27Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Administrative Sciences
spelling doaj.art-b4cefe49ebfb47b681e570098f7c97692023-05-26T13:20:28ZengMDPI AGAdministrative Sciences2076-33872023-04-011312012010.3390/admsci13050120Validating the Whistleblowing Maturity Model Using the Delphi MethodPaschalis Kagias0Nikolaos Sariannidis1Alexandros Garefalakis2Ioannis Passas3Panagiotis Kyriakogkonas4Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Western Macedonia, 501 00 Kozani, GreeceDepartment of Accounting and Finance, University of Western Macedonia, 501 00 Kozani, GreeceDepartment of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Iraklio, GreeceDepartment of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Iraklio, GreeceDepartment of Accounting and Finance, Neapolis University Pafos, Paphos 8042, CyprusEmpirical research identifies whistleblowing as one of the most effective internal antifraud controls. Very recently, Directive 1937/2019 became effective in the EU, aiming to deal with the defragmentation of whistleblowing legislation among the member states and provide common minimum accepted standards. The present article aims to provide a verified, weighted comparative maturity model. The suggested model has been constructed based on the methodology for constructing comparative maturity models and validated based on the Delphi method. The weights on each validated component have been calculated based on the summing of votes method. The study resulted in eight main components «scope», «corporate governance», «reporting mechanisms», «protection», «tone at the top», «organizational and human resource practices», «investigations» and «monitor and review» divided further into 18 elements. The suggested maturity model may provide a pathway for organizations to develop and maintain a robust whistleblowing maturity framework that will benefit both the organizations and the public welfare.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/5/120whistleblowingEU Directive 1937benchmarkinginternal auditESG
spellingShingle Paschalis Kagias
Nikolaos Sariannidis
Alexandros Garefalakis
Ioannis Passas
Panagiotis Kyriakogkonas
Validating the Whistleblowing Maturity Model Using the Delphi Method
Administrative Sciences
whistleblowing
EU Directive 1937
benchmarking
internal audit
ESG
title Validating the Whistleblowing Maturity Model Using the Delphi Method
title_full Validating the Whistleblowing Maturity Model Using the Delphi Method
title_fullStr Validating the Whistleblowing Maturity Model Using the Delphi Method
title_full_unstemmed Validating the Whistleblowing Maturity Model Using the Delphi Method
title_short Validating the Whistleblowing Maturity Model Using the Delphi Method
title_sort validating the whistleblowing maturity model using the delphi method
topic whistleblowing
EU Directive 1937
benchmarking
internal audit
ESG
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/5/120
work_keys_str_mv AT paschaliskagias validatingthewhistleblowingmaturitymodelusingthedelphimethod
AT nikolaossariannidis validatingthewhistleblowingmaturitymodelusingthedelphimethod
AT alexandrosgarefalakis validatingthewhistleblowingmaturitymodelusingthedelphimethod
AT ioannispassas validatingthewhistleblowingmaturitymodelusingthedelphimethod
AT panagiotiskyriakogkonas validatingthewhistleblowingmaturitymodelusingthedelphimethod