Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual

Introduction In 2018, within the Horizon 2020 program, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro. During the years 2019 and 2020 Community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for management of treatmen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Tomcuk, V. Roganovic, K. Tomcuk, S. Dedovic, T. Djurisic, J. Dedovic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2023-03-01
Series:European Psychiatry
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933823004467/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797616807735984128
author A. Tomcuk
V. Roganovic
K. Tomcuk
S. Dedovic
T. Djurisic
J. Dedovic
author_facet A. Tomcuk
V. Roganovic
K. Tomcuk
S. Dedovic
T. Djurisic
J. Dedovic
author_sort A. Tomcuk
collection DOAJ
description Introduction In 2018, within the Horizon 2020 program, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro. During the years 2019 and 2020 Community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for management of treatment of a group of users with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of „Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT – A Dutch model). Objectives The main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the use of seclusions, restraints and forced medication during the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro. Methods A sample of 202 users of mental health services from Kotor and surrounding municipalities were recruited. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and control group where treatment as usual was continued (outpatient treatment without field work and hospital readmissions during the psychotic relapses). To estimate and follow-up the frequency of application of coercive measures in this research, hospital documentation was used. Results Patients in the intervention group had statistically significant less coercive intervention (such are mechanical restraining, seclusions, isolations and forced medication) during the study. There were no significant differences in the number of hospital days and readmission rates. Conclusions This study showed that CMHT care could reduce some of the coercive measures during the treatment of severe mental illnesses. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:46:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b4ef805787894274b8af7ee4c2a3d5a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0924-9338
1778-3585
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:46:38Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series European Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-b4ef805787894274b8af7ee4c2a3d5a22023-11-17T05:07:31ZengCambridge University PressEuropean Psychiatry0924-93381778-35852023-03-0166S187S18710.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.446Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usualA. Tomcuk0V. Roganovic1K. Tomcuk2S. Dedovic3T. Djurisic4J. Dedovic51Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor, Kotor2Health Center Budva, Budva3Special hospital Risan, Kotor2Health Center Budva, Budva4Institute for Public Health of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro1Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor, Kotor Introduction In 2018, within the Horizon 2020 program, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro. During the years 2019 and 2020 Community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for management of treatment of a group of users with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of „Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT – A Dutch model). Objectives The main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the use of seclusions, restraints and forced medication during the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro. Methods A sample of 202 users of mental health services from Kotor and surrounding municipalities were recruited. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and control group where treatment as usual was continued (outpatient treatment without field work and hospital readmissions during the psychotic relapses). To estimate and follow-up the frequency of application of coercive measures in this research, hospital documentation was used. Results Patients in the intervention group had statistically significant less coercive intervention (such are mechanical restraining, seclusions, isolations and forced medication) during the study. There were no significant differences in the number of hospital days and readmission rates. Conclusions This study showed that CMHT care could reduce some of the coercive measures during the treatment of severe mental illnesses. Disclosure of Interest None Declaredhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933823004467/type/journal_article
spellingShingle A. Tomcuk
V. Roganovic
K. Tomcuk
S. Dedovic
T. Djurisic
J. Dedovic
Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
European Psychiatry
title Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title_full Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title_fullStr Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title_full_unstemmed Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title_short Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title_sort coercion rates in different mental health care models flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933823004467/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT atomcuk coercionratesindifferentmentalhealthcaremodelsflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentvscareasusual
AT vroganovic coercionratesindifferentmentalhealthcaremodelsflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentvscareasusual
AT ktomcuk coercionratesindifferentmentalhealthcaremodelsflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentvscareasusual
AT sdedovic coercionratesindifferentmentalhealthcaremodelsflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentvscareasusual
AT tdjurisic coercionratesindifferentmentalhealthcaremodelsflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentvscareasusual
AT jdedovic coercionratesindifferentmentalhealthcaremodelsflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentvscareasusual