Deduction of probable events of lateral gene transfer through comparison of phylogenetic trees by recursive consolidation and rearrangement

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>When organismal phylogenies based on sequences of single marker genes are poorly resolved, a logical approach is to add more markers, on the assumption that weak but congruent phylogenetic signal will be reinforced in such multigene...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlebois Robert L, MacLeod Dave, Doolittle Ford, Bapteste Eric
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-04-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/5/27
_version_ 1818907413906980864
author Charlebois Robert L
MacLeod Dave
Doolittle Ford
Bapteste Eric
author_facet Charlebois Robert L
MacLeod Dave
Doolittle Ford
Bapteste Eric
author_sort Charlebois Robert L
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>When organismal phylogenies based on sequences of single marker genes are poorly resolved, a logical approach is to add more markers, on the assumption that weak but congruent phylogenetic signal will be reinforced in such multigene trees. Such approaches are valid only when the several markers indeed have identical phylogenies, an issue which many multigene methods (such as the use of concatenated gene sequences or the assembly of supertrees) do not directly address. Indeed, even when the true history is a mixture of vertical descent for some genes and lateral gene transfer (LGT) for others, such methods produce unique topologies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We have developed software that aims to extract evidence for vertical and lateral inheritance from a set of gene trees compared against an arbitrary reference tree. This evidence is then displayed as a synthesis showing support over the tree for vertical inheritance, overlaid with explicit lateral gene transfer (LGT) events inferred to have occurred over the history of the tree. Like splits-tree methods, one can thus identify nodes at which conflict occurs. Additionally one can make reasonable inferences about vertical and lateral signal, assigning putative donors and recipients.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A tool such as ours can serve to explore the reticulated dimensionality of molecular evolution, by dissecting vertical and lateral inheritance at high resolution. By this, we mean that individual nodes can be examined not only for congruence, but also for coherence in light of LGT. We assert that our tools will facilitate the comparison of phylogenetic trees, and the interpretation of conflicting data.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-19T21:54:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b4f136fc27c541e2a1d362751df1975a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2148
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T21:54:44Z
publishDate 2005-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
spelling doaj.art-b4f136fc27c541e2a1d362751df1975a2022-12-21T20:04:18ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482005-04-01512710.1186/1471-2148-5-27Deduction of probable events of lateral gene transfer through comparison of phylogenetic trees by recursive consolidation and rearrangementCharlebois Robert LMacLeod DaveDoolittle FordBapteste Eric<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>When organismal phylogenies based on sequences of single marker genes are poorly resolved, a logical approach is to add more markers, on the assumption that weak but congruent phylogenetic signal will be reinforced in such multigene trees. Such approaches are valid only when the several markers indeed have identical phylogenies, an issue which many multigene methods (such as the use of concatenated gene sequences or the assembly of supertrees) do not directly address. Indeed, even when the true history is a mixture of vertical descent for some genes and lateral gene transfer (LGT) for others, such methods produce unique topologies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We have developed software that aims to extract evidence for vertical and lateral inheritance from a set of gene trees compared against an arbitrary reference tree. This evidence is then displayed as a synthesis showing support over the tree for vertical inheritance, overlaid with explicit lateral gene transfer (LGT) events inferred to have occurred over the history of the tree. Like splits-tree methods, one can thus identify nodes at which conflict occurs. Additionally one can make reasonable inferences about vertical and lateral signal, assigning putative donors and recipients.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A tool such as ours can serve to explore the reticulated dimensionality of molecular evolution, by dissecting vertical and lateral inheritance at high resolution. By this, we mean that individual nodes can be examined not only for congruence, but also for coherence in light of LGT. We assert that our tools will facilitate the comparison of phylogenetic trees, and the interpretation of conflicting data.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/5/27
spellingShingle Charlebois Robert L
MacLeod Dave
Doolittle Ford
Bapteste Eric
Deduction of probable events of lateral gene transfer through comparison of phylogenetic trees by recursive consolidation and rearrangement
BMC Evolutionary Biology
title Deduction of probable events of lateral gene transfer through comparison of phylogenetic trees by recursive consolidation and rearrangement
title_full Deduction of probable events of lateral gene transfer through comparison of phylogenetic trees by recursive consolidation and rearrangement
title_fullStr Deduction of probable events of lateral gene transfer through comparison of phylogenetic trees by recursive consolidation and rearrangement
title_full_unstemmed Deduction of probable events of lateral gene transfer through comparison of phylogenetic trees by recursive consolidation and rearrangement
title_short Deduction of probable events of lateral gene transfer through comparison of phylogenetic trees by recursive consolidation and rearrangement
title_sort deduction of probable events of lateral gene transfer through comparison of phylogenetic trees by recursive consolidation and rearrangement
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/5/27
work_keys_str_mv AT charleboisrobertl deductionofprobableeventsoflateralgenetransferthroughcomparisonofphylogenetictreesbyrecursiveconsolidationandrearrangement
AT macleoddave deductionofprobableeventsoflateralgenetransferthroughcomparisonofphylogenetictreesbyrecursiveconsolidationandrearrangement
AT doolittleford deductionofprobableeventsoflateralgenetransferthroughcomparisonofphylogenetictreesbyrecursiveconsolidationandrearrangement
AT baptesteeric deductionofprobableeventsoflateralgenetransferthroughcomparisonofphylogenetictreesbyrecursiveconsolidationandrearrangement