Net Promoter Score (NPS): What Does Net Promoter Score Offer in the Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education?

Net promoter Score (NPS) has been used in many fields, such as software, clinical care, and websites, as a measure of customer satisfaction since 2003. With a single question, NPS methodology is thought to determine brand loyalty and intent to act based on experiences with the brand or product. In t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katie Stringer Lucero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of European CME
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21614083.2022.2152941
_version_ 1811321115036876800
author Katie Stringer Lucero
author_facet Katie Stringer Lucero
author_sort Katie Stringer Lucero
collection DOAJ
description Net promoter Score (NPS) has been used in many fields, such as software, clinical care, and websites, as a measure of customer satisfaction since 2003. With a single question, NPS methodology is thought to determine brand loyalty and intent to act based on experiences with the brand or product. In the current study, accredited continuing medical education or continuing education (CME/CE) was the product. Providers of CME have utilised NPS rating (the individual score on a scale of 0 to 10) to collect data about the value of the experience a clinician has with CME activities, but there has been no research to examine what it actually is associated with. This study looked to understand – relative to other self-reported and assessment outcomes in CME, what does NPS at the activity level indicate? From 155 online CME programmes (29,696 target audience learners with complete data), potential outcomes of CME, including whether knowledge or competence improved via assessment score, mean post-confidence rating, and whether one intended practices changes and was committed to those changes, were examined as predictors of NPS. NPS is unique in that it cannot be calculated at the individual level; individual scores must be aggregated, and then the percentage who selected ratings of 0 to 5 is subtracted from the percentage who selected 9 or 10. Results showed that percentage of learners who are committed to change predicts 70% of the variance in NPS, which suggests NPS is a valid indicator of intention to act. These results have implications for how we might, as a field, incorporate the utilisation of a single standardised question to examine the potential impact of online CME and call for additional research on whether NPS predicts change in clinical practice.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:11:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b4faf74b548f4e94b7d2ae2af224ac92
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2161-4083
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:11:01Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of European CME
spelling doaj.art-b4faf74b548f4e94b7d2ae2af224ac922022-12-22T02:45:36ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of European CME2161-40832022-12-0111110.1080/21614083.2022.2152941Net Promoter Score (NPS): What Does Net Promoter Score Offer in the Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education?Katie Stringer Lucero0Medscape, LLC, New York, USANet promoter Score (NPS) has been used in many fields, such as software, clinical care, and websites, as a measure of customer satisfaction since 2003. With a single question, NPS methodology is thought to determine brand loyalty and intent to act based on experiences with the brand or product. In the current study, accredited continuing medical education or continuing education (CME/CE) was the product. Providers of CME have utilised NPS rating (the individual score on a scale of 0 to 10) to collect data about the value of the experience a clinician has with CME activities, but there has been no research to examine what it actually is associated with. This study looked to understand – relative to other self-reported and assessment outcomes in CME, what does NPS at the activity level indicate? From 155 online CME programmes (29,696 target audience learners with complete data), potential outcomes of CME, including whether knowledge or competence improved via assessment score, mean post-confidence rating, and whether one intended practices changes and was committed to those changes, were examined as predictors of NPS. NPS is unique in that it cannot be calculated at the individual level; individual scores must be aggregated, and then the percentage who selected ratings of 0 to 5 is subtracted from the percentage who selected 9 or 10. Results showed that percentage of learners who are committed to change predicts 70% of the variance in NPS, which suggests NPS is a valid indicator of intention to act. These results have implications for how we might, as a field, incorporate the utilisation of a single standardised question to examine the potential impact of online CME and call for additional research on whether NPS predicts change in clinical practice.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21614083.2022.2152941Outcomesnet promoter scoreevaluationcommitment to changeintention to act
spellingShingle Katie Stringer Lucero
Net Promoter Score (NPS): What Does Net Promoter Score Offer in the Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education?
Journal of European CME
Outcomes
net promoter score
evaluation
commitment to change
intention to act
title Net Promoter Score (NPS): What Does Net Promoter Score Offer in the Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education?
title_full Net Promoter Score (NPS): What Does Net Promoter Score Offer in the Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education?
title_fullStr Net Promoter Score (NPS): What Does Net Promoter Score Offer in the Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education?
title_full_unstemmed Net Promoter Score (NPS): What Does Net Promoter Score Offer in the Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education?
title_short Net Promoter Score (NPS): What Does Net Promoter Score Offer in the Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education?
title_sort net promoter score nps what does net promoter score offer in the evaluation of continuing medical education
topic Outcomes
net promoter score
evaluation
commitment to change
intention to act
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21614083.2022.2152941
work_keys_str_mv AT katiestringerlucero netpromoterscorenpswhatdoesnetpromoterscoreofferintheevaluationofcontinuingmedicaleducation