Gloss to the Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 June 2019 (P 20/17, OTK-A 2019, Item 29)

The author agrees with the Constitutional Tribunal’s opinion that Article 87 § 1 of the Penal Code to the extent that it imposes an obligation on the court to combine imprisonment and restriction of liberty and to impose a total penalty of deprivation of liberty after converting the penalty of restr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aleksandra Nowosad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University 2020-06-01
Series:Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/10600
_version_ 1818293845618589696
author Aleksandra Nowosad
author_facet Aleksandra Nowosad
author_sort Aleksandra Nowosad
collection DOAJ
description The author agrees with the Constitutional Tribunal’s opinion that Article 87 § 1 of the Penal Code to the extent that it imposes an obligation on the court to combine imprisonment and restriction of liberty and to impose a total penalty of deprivation of liberty after converting the penalty of restriction of liberty into imprisonment is inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. In addition, the author raised the problem of ratio legis of Article 87 of the Penal Code and indicated why the deficiencies in regulation were noticed so late in the case law.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T03:22:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b50110f6cf554d55a90c7364ce367fc6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1731-6375
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T03:22:20Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Maria Curie-Skłodowska University
record_format Article
series Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
spelling doaj.art-b50110f6cf554d55a90c7364ce367fc62022-12-22T00:01:20ZengMaria Curie-Skłodowska UniversityStudia Iuridica Lublinensia1731-63752020-06-0129327728710.17951/sil.2020.29.3.277-2877620Gloss to the Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 June 2019 (P 20/17, OTK-A 2019, Item 29)Aleksandra Nowosad0Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie. Wydział Prawa i AdministracjiThe author agrees with the Constitutional Tribunal’s opinion that Article 87 § 1 of the Penal Code to the extent that it imposes an obligation on the court to combine imprisonment and restriction of liberty and to impose a total penalty of deprivation of liberty after converting the penalty of restriction of liberty into imprisonment is inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. In addition, the author raised the problem of ratio legis of Article 87 of the Penal Code and indicated why the deficiencies in regulation were noticed so late in the case law.https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/10600kara ograniczenia wolnościkara pozbawienia wolnościsekwencja karkara łącznawyrok łącznyzbieg przestępstw
spellingShingle Aleksandra Nowosad
Gloss to the Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 June 2019 (P 20/17, OTK-A 2019, Item 29)
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
kara ograniczenia wolności
kara pozbawienia wolności
sekwencja kar
kara łączna
wyrok łączny
zbieg przestępstw
title Gloss to the Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 June 2019 (P 20/17, OTK-A 2019, Item 29)
title_full Gloss to the Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 June 2019 (P 20/17, OTK-A 2019, Item 29)
title_fullStr Gloss to the Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 June 2019 (P 20/17, OTK-A 2019, Item 29)
title_full_unstemmed Gloss to the Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 June 2019 (P 20/17, OTK-A 2019, Item 29)
title_short Gloss to the Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 June 2019 (P 20/17, OTK-A 2019, Item 29)
title_sort gloss to the judgement of the constitutional tribunal of 11 june 2019 p 20 17 otk a 2019 item 29
topic kara ograniczenia wolności
kara pozbawienia wolności
sekwencja kar
kara łączna
wyrok łączny
zbieg przestępstw
url https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/10600
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandranowosad glosstothejudgementoftheconstitutionaltribunalof11june2019p2017otka2019item29