The Biopolitics of Nourishing Life
In this paper, I argue that nourishing life (yangsheng 養生) as a self-cultivating practice stands as an alternative model of biopolitics that challenges the neoliberal one. Existing scholarship on nourishing life focuses much on its ethical significance, for instance, as an effective way to lead a l...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
2023-05-01
|
| Series: | Asian Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/11757 |
| _version_ | 1797825411732733952 |
|---|---|
| author | Manhua Li |
| author_facet | Manhua Li |
| author_sort | Manhua Li |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In this paper, I argue that nourishing life (yangsheng 養生) as a self-cultivating practice stands as an alternative model of biopolitics that challenges the neoliberal one. Existing scholarship on nourishing life focuses much on its ethical significance, for instance, as an effective way to lead a long life, whereas Nelson’s most recent monograph Daoism as Environmental Philosophy: Nourishing Life provides new insights into the socio-political aspect of it, in terms of an ecological way of government. However, Nelson’s discussion of biopolitics rarely engages with the Seven Sages in the Bamboo Forest (zhulin qixian 竹林七賢) that nonetheless practice nourishing life themselves, as an art of living and a political strategy. Focused on nourishing life in Ji Kang as one of the Sages, I situate my position against Jullien’s claim that the self-cultivating sage is uncritical due to his incapacity to think of conflict in the face of power. And in the context of his book I also highlight Heubel’s negligence of the neoliberal political economy underlying Foucauldian biopolitics in the context of his intercultural study of nourishing life as a possible model of biopolitics. As such, based on Nelson’s consideration of the non-coercive ethos and praxis of Dao, I propose a biopolitics of nourishing life as opposed to the neoliberal “environmental technology” that normalizes materialist lifestyle and attitudes, the production of freedom as commodity.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T10:53:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b524d437b7224473b8abaa652484632f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2232-5131 2350-4226 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T10:53:39Z |
| publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
| publisher | University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Asian Studies |
| spelling | doaj.art-b524d437b7224473b8abaa652484632f2023-05-17T07:16:28ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Asian Studies2232-51312350-42262023-05-0111210.4312/as.2023.11.2.95-116The Biopolitics of Nourishing LifeManhua Li0Royal Holloway College University of London, United Kingdom In this paper, I argue that nourishing life (yangsheng 養生) as a self-cultivating practice stands as an alternative model of biopolitics that challenges the neoliberal one. Existing scholarship on nourishing life focuses much on its ethical significance, for instance, as an effective way to lead a long life, whereas Nelson’s most recent monograph Daoism as Environmental Philosophy: Nourishing Life provides new insights into the socio-political aspect of it, in terms of an ecological way of government. However, Nelson’s discussion of biopolitics rarely engages with the Seven Sages in the Bamboo Forest (zhulin qixian 竹林七賢) that nonetheless practice nourishing life themselves, as an art of living and a political strategy. Focused on nourishing life in Ji Kang as one of the Sages, I situate my position against Jullien’s claim that the self-cultivating sage is uncritical due to his incapacity to think of conflict in the face of power. And in the context of his book I also highlight Heubel’s negligence of the neoliberal political economy underlying Foucauldian biopolitics in the context of his intercultural study of nourishing life as a possible model of biopolitics. As such, based on Nelson’s consideration of the non-coercive ethos and praxis of Dao, I propose a biopolitics of nourishing life as opposed to the neoliberal “environmental technology” that normalizes materialist lifestyle and attitudes, the production of freedom as commodity. https://journals.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/11757biopoliticsnourishing lifeneoliberalismenvironmenttechnology of the self |
| spellingShingle | Manhua Li The Biopolitics of Nourishing Life Asian Studies biopolitics nourishing life neoliberalism environment technology of the self |
| title | The Biopolitics of Nourishing Life |
| title_full | The Biopolitics of Nourishing Life |
| title_fullStr | The Biopolitics of Nourishing Life |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Biopolitics of Nourishing Life |
| title_short | The Biopolitics of Nourishing Life |
| title_sort | biopolitics of nourishing life |
| topic | biopolitics nourishing life neoliberalism environment technology of the self |
| url | https://journals.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/11757 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT manhuali thebiopoliticsofnourishinglife AT manhuali biopoliticsofnourishinglife |