Comparing alternatives to the fixed degree sequence model for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections

Abstract Projections of bipartite or two-mode networks capture co-occurrences, and are used in diverse fields (e.g., ecology, economics, bibliometrics, politics) to represent unipartite networks. A key challenge in analyzing such networks is determining whether an observed number of co-occurrences b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zachary P. Neal, Rachel Domagalski, Bruce Sagan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-12-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03238-3
_version_ 1819096234535682048
author Zachary P. Neal
Rachel Domagalski
Bruce Sagan
author_facet Zachary P. Neal
Rachel Domagalski
Bruce Sagan
author_sort Zachary P. Neal
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Projections of bipartite or two-mode networks capture co-occurrences, and are used in diverse fields (e.g., ecology, economics, bibliometrics, politics) to represent unipartite networks. A key challenge in analyzing such networks is determining whether an observed number of co-occurrences between two nodes is significant, and therefore whether an edge exists between them. One approach, the fixed degree sequence model (FDSM), evaluates the significance of an edge’s weight by comparison to a null model in which the degree sequences of the original bipartite network are fixed. Although the FDSM is an intuitive null model, it is computationally expensive because it requires Monte Carlo simulation to estimate each edge’s p value, and therefore is impractical for large projections. In this paper, we explore four potential alternatives to FDSM: fixed fill model, fixed row model, fixed column model, and stochastic degree sequence model (SDSM). We compare these models to FDSM in terms of accuracy, speed, statistical power, similarity, and ability to recover known communities. We find that the computationally-fast SDSM offers a statistically conservative but close approximation of the computationally-impractical FDSM under a wide range of conditions, and that it correctly recovers a known community structure even when the signal is weak. Therefore, although each backbone model may have particular applications, we recommend SDSM for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections when FDSM is impractical.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T23:55:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b527652371a34aa8a83143569a59051d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T23:55:57Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-b527652371a34aa8a83143569a59051d2022-12-21T18:45:49ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-12-0111111310.1038/s41598-021-03238-3Comparing alternatives to the fixed degree sequence model for extracting the backbone of bipartite projectionsZachary P. Neal0Rachel Domagalski1Bruce Sagan2Psychology Department, Michigan State UniversityMathematics Department, Michigan State UniversityMathematics Department, Michigan State UniversityAbstract Projections of bipartite or two-mode networks capture co-occurrences, and are used in diverse fields (e.g., ecology, economics, bibliometrics, politics) to represent unipartite networks. A key challenge in analyzing such networks is determining whether an observed number of co-occurrences between two nodes is significant, and therefore whether an edge exists between them. One approach, the fixed degree sequence model (FDSM), evaluates the significance of an edge’s weight by comparison to a null model in which the degree sequences of the original bipartite network are fixed. Although the FDSM is an intuitive null model, it is computationally expensive because it requires Monte Carlo simulation to estimate each edge’s p value, and therefore is impractical for large projections. In this paper, we explore four potential alternatives to FDSM: fixed fill model, fixed row model, fixed column model, and stochastic degree sequence model (SDSM). We compare these models to FDSM in terms of accuracy, speed, statistical power, similarity, and ability to recover known communities. We find that the computationally-fast SDSM offers a statistically conservative but close approximation of the computationally-impractical FDSM under a wide range of conditions, and that it correctly recovers a known community structure even when the signal is weak. Therefore, although each backbone model may have particular applications, we recommend SDSM for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections when FDSM is impractical.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03238-3
spellingShingle Zachary P. Neal
Rachel Domagalski
Bruce Sagan
Comparing alternatives to the fixed degree sequence model for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections
Scientific Reports
title Comparing alternatives to the fixed degree sequence model for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections
title_full Comparing alternatives to the fixed degree sequence model for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections
title_fullStr Comparing alternatives to the fixed degree sequence model for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections
title_full_unstemmed Comparing alternatives to the fixed degree sequence model for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections
title_short Comparing alternatives to the fixed degree sequence model for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections
title_sort comparing alternatives to the fixed degree sequence model for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03238-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharypneal comparingalternativestothefixeddegreesequencemodelforextractingthebackboneofbipartiteprojections
AT racheldomagalski comparingalternativestothefixeddegreesequencemodelforextractingthebackboneofbipartiteprojections
AT brucesagan comparingalternativestothefixeddegreesequencemodelforextractingthebackboneofbipartiteprojections