Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail
TCP was developed to deal with problems that often occur in the network, such as congestion problems. Congestion can occur when the number of packets transmitted in the network approaches the network capacity which can cause network problems. This can be overcome by implementing TCP and queue manage...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | JISKA (Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga) |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/saintek/JISKA/article/view/2809 |
| _version_ | 1797717695511134208 |
|---|---|
| author | Dony Fahrudy Bambang Sugiantoro |
| author_facet | Dony Fahrudy Bambang Sugiantoro |
| author_sort | Dony Fahrudy |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | TCP was developed to deal with problems that often occur in the network, such as congestion problems. Congestion can occur when the number of packets transmitted in the network approaches the network capacity which can cause network problems. This can be overcome by implementing TCP and queue management. In this research, we will test the performance of TCP Newreno and TCP Vegas using NS-2 in the Drop Tail queue. The performance parameters used are throughput, packet drop, and congestion window with additional buffer capacity. The test results for the congestion window and packet drop parameters, TCP Vegas has better performance when the buffer gets bigger when congestion occurs with the congestion window smaller than TCP New Reno and the average packet drop is 18.33 packets compared to TCP New Reno with an average of 18.33 packets. average 41.67 packets. For throughput parameters, TCP New Reno has better performance with an average of 6.77253 Mbps than TCP Vegas with an average of 4.29693 Mbps. From testing and analysis that TCP Vegas has better performance than TCP New Reno when using Drop Tail queues. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T08:40:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b52a331ae5b541cbb91d19978cd1b097 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2527-5836 2528-0074 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T08:40:06Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JISKA (Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga) |
| spelling | doaj.art-b52a331ae5b541cbb91d19978cd1b0972023-09-02T16:57:01ZengUniversitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaJISKA (Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga)2527-58362528-00742022-01-017110.14421/jiska.2022.7.1.20-32Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop TailDony Fahrudy0Bambang Sugiantoro1UIN Sunan KalijagaUIN Sunan KalijagaTCP was developed to deal with problems that often occur in the network, such as congestion problems. Congestion can occur when the number of packets transmitted in the network approaches the network capacity which can cause network problems. This can be overcome by implementing TCP and queue management. In this research, we will test the performance of TCP Newreno and TCP Vegas using NS-2 in the Drop Tail queue. The performance parameters used are throughput, packet drop, and congestion window with additional buffer capacity. The test results for the congestion window and packet drop parameters, TCP Vegas has better performance when the buffer gets bigger when congestion occurs with the congestion window smaller than TCP New Reno and the average packet drop is 18.33 packets compared to TCP New Reno with an average of 18.33 packets. average 41.67 packets. For throughput parameters, TCP New Reno has better performance with an average of 6.77253 Mbps than TCP Vegas with an average of 4.29693 Mbps. From testing and analysis that TCP Vegas has better performance than TCP New Reno when using Drop Tail queues.http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/saintek/JISKA/article/view/2809DroptailNS-2TCP NewrenoTCP VegasPacket Data Queuing |
| spellingShingle | Dony Fahrudy Bambang Sugiantoro Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail JISKA (Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga) Droptail NS-2 TCP Newreno TCP Vegas Packet Data Queuing |
| title | Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail |
| title_full | Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail |
| title_fullStr | Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail |
| title_short | Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail |
| title_sort | analisis perbandingan kinerja tcp vegas dan tcp new reno menggunakan antrian drop tail |
| topic | Droptail NS-2 TCP Newreno TCP Vegas Packet Data Queuing |
| url | http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/saintek/JISKA/article/view/2809 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT donyfahrudy analisisperbandingankinerjatcpvegasdantcpnewrenomenggunakanantriandroptail AT bambangsugiantoro analisisperbandingankinerjatcpvegasdantcpnewrenomenggunakanantriandroptail |