Degradation Detection in a Redundant Sensor Architecture

Safety-critical automation often requires redundancy to enable reliable system operation. In the context of integrating sensors into such systems, the one-out-of-two (1oo2) sensor architecture is one of the common used methods used to ensure the reliability and traceability of sensor readings. In ta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amer Kajmakovic, Konrad Diwold, Kay Römer, Jesus Pestana, Nermin Kajtazovic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/12/4649
_version_ 1797482360030101504
author Amer Kajmakovic
Konrad Diwold
Kay Römer
Jesus Pestana
Nermin Kajtazovic
author_facet Amer Kajmakovic
Konrad Diwold
Kay Römer
Jesus Pestana
Nermin Kajtazovic
author_sort Amer Kajmakovic
collection DOAJ
description Safety-critical automation often requires redundancy to enable reliable system operation. In the context of integrating sensors into such systems, the one-out-of-two (1oo2) sensor architecture is one of the common used methods used to ensure the reliability and traceability of sensor readings. In taking such an approach, readings from two redundant sensors are continuously checked and compared. As soon as the discrepancy between two redundant lines deviates by a certain threshold, the 1oo2 voter (comparator) assumes that there is a fault in the system and immediately activates the safe state. In this work, we propose a novel fault prognosis algorithm based on the discrepancy signal. We analyzed the discrepancy changes in the 1oo2 sensor configuration caused by degradation processes. Several publicly available databases were checked, and the discrepancy between redundant sensors was analyzed. An initial analysis showed that the discrepancy between sensor values changes (increases or decreases) over time. To detect an increase or decrease in discrepancy data, two trend detection methods are suggested, and the evaluation of their performance is presented. Moreover, several models were trained on the discrepancy data. The models were then compared to determine which of the models can be best used to describe the dynamics of the discrepancy changes. In addition, the best-fitting models were used to predict the future behavior of the discrepancy and to detect if, and when, the discrepancy in sensor readings will reach a critical point. Based on the prediction of the failure date, the customer can schedule the maintenance system accordingly and prevent its entry into the safe state—or being shut down.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:31:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b53a8a54ce114264b60731ac1f2889a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:31:11Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-b53a8a54ce114264b60731ac1f2889a52023-11-23T18:56:51ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-06-012212464910.3390/s22124649Degradation Detection in a Redundant Sensor ArchitectureAmer Kajmakovic0Konrad Diwold1Kay Römer2Jesus Pestana3Nermin Kajtazovic4Pro2Future GmbH, 8010 Graz, AustriaPro2Future GmbH, 8010 Graz, AustriaInstitute of Technical Informatics, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, AustriaPro2Future GmbH, 8010 Graz, AustriaSiemens AG, 8054 Graz, AustriaSafety-critical automation often requires redundancy to enable reliable system operation. In the context of integrating sensors into such systems, the one-out-of-two (1oo2) sensor architecture is one of the common used methods used to ensure the reliability and traceability of sensor readings. In taking such an approach, readings from two redundant sensors are continuously checked and compared. As soon as the discrepancy between two redundant lines deviates by a certain threshold, the 1oo2 voter (comparator) assumes that there is a fault in the system and immediately activates the safe state. In this work, we propose a novel fault prognosis algorithm based on the discrepancy signal. We analyzed the discrepancy changes in the 1oo2 sensor configuration caused by degradation processes. Several publicly available databases were checked, and the discrepancy between redundant sensors was analyzed. An initial analysis showed that the discrepancy between sensor values changes (increases or decreases) over time. To detect an increase or decrease in discrepancy data, two trend detection methods are suggested, and the evaluation of their performance is presented. Moreover, several models were trained on the discrepancy data. The models were then compared to determine which of the models can be best used to describe the dynamics of the discrepancy changes. In addition, the best-fitting models were used to predict the future behavior of the discrepancy and to detect if, and when, the discrepancy in sensor readings will reach a critical point. Based on the prediction of the failure date, the customer can schedule the maintenance system accordingly and prevent its entry into the safe state—or being shut down.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/12/4649degradationdriftdiscrepancyredundant sensors1oo2 architecture
spellingShingle Amer Kajmakovic
Konrad Diwold
Kay Römer
Jesus Pestana
Nermin Kajtazovic
Degradation Detection in a Redundant Sensor Architecture
Sensors
degradation
drift
discrepancy
redundant sensors
1oo2 architecture
title Degradation Detection in a Redundant Sensor Architecture
title_full Degradation Detection in a Redundant Sensor Architecture
title_fullStr Degradation Detection in a Redundant Sensor Architecture
title_full_unstemmed Degradation Detection in a Redundant Sensor Architecture
title_short Degradation Detection in a Redundant Sensor Architecture
title_sort degradation detection in a redundant sensor architecture
topic degradation
drift
discrepancy
redundant sensors
1oo2 architecture
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/12/4649
work_keys_str_mv AT amerkajmakovic degradationdetectioninaredundantsensorarchitecture
AT konraddiwold degradationdetectioninaredundantsensorarchitecture
AT kayromer degradationdetectioninaredundantsensorarchitecture
AT jesuspestana degradationdetectioninaredundantsensorarchitecture
AT nerminkajtazovic degradationdetectioninaredundantsensorarchitecture