Machine vs. human, who makes a better judgment on innovation? Take GPT-4 for example

IntroductionHuman decision-making is a complex process that is often influenced by various external and internal factors. One such factor is noise, random, and irrelevant influences that can skew outcomes.MethodsThis essay uses the CAT test and computer simulations to measure creativity.ResultsEvide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mark Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frai.2023.1206516/full
Description
Summary:IntroductionHuman decision-making is a complex process that is often influenced by various external and internal factors. One such factor is noise, random, and irrelevant influences that can skew outcomes.MethodsThis essay uses the CAT test and computer simulations to measure creativity.ResultsEvidence indicates that humans are intrinsically prone to noise, leading to inconsistent and, at times, inaccurate decisions. In contrast, simple rules demonstrate a higher level of accuracy and consistency, while artificial intelligence demonstrates an even higher capability to process vast data and employ logical algorithms.DiscussionThe potential of AI, particularly its intuitive capabilities, might be surpassing human intuition in specific decision-making scenarios. This raises crucial questions about the future roles of humans and machines in decision-making spheres, especially in domains where precision is paramount.
ISSN:2624-8212