Others’ opinions count, but not all of them: anchoring to ingroup versus outgroup members’ behavior in charitable giving
Because of the large amount of information and the difficulty in selecting an appropriate recipient in the context of charitable giving, people tend to make extensive use of heuristics, which sometimes leads them to wrong decisions. In the present work, we focused on exploring how individuals are in...
Main Authors: | Dorina Hysenbelli, Enrico Rubaltelli, Rino Rumiati |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2013-11-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029750000471X/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
Others' opinions count, but not all of them: anchoring to ingroup versus outgroup members' behavior in charitable giving
by: Dorina Hysenbelli, et al.
Published: (2013-11-01) -
Conformación de "ingroups" y "outgroups" en el discurso de los lectores comentaristas en blogs periodísticos
by: Cristian González Arias, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01) -
Effects of Religious Priming Concepts on Prosocial Behavior Towards Ingroup and Outgroup
by: Jame Bryan L. Batara, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Affective Polarization: Not Always Between Ingroup Vs Outgroup (Evidence from Twitter Conversation with Keywords Jokowi and PDIP)
by: Putri Nur.A.Dwi, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
The Effect of Ingroup vs. Outgroup Members' Behavior on Charity Preference: A Drift-Diffusion Model Approach
by: Lars M. Reich, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01)