Preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures: Evidence from intermixed probe trials

Attention can be directed to the global or local level of a visual stimulus (i.e., Navon figure). Previous studies yielded reliable trial-to-trial level switch costs (i.e., worse performance when responding to the other level than on a previous trial), even though level cueing effects indicated anti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Svantje T. Kähler, Mike Wendt, Imke M. Dühnen, Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez, Thomas Jacobsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-05-01
Series:Acta Psychologica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824000829
_version_ 1811153550451933184
author Svantje T. Kähler
Mike Wendt
Imke M. Dühnen
Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez
Thomas Jacobsen
author_facet Svantje T. Kähler
Mike Wendt
Imke M. Dühnen
Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez
Thomas Jacobsen
author_sort Svantje T. Kähler
collection DOAJ
description Attention can be directed to the global or local level of a visual stimulus (i.e., Navon figure). Previous studies yielded reliable trial-to-trial level switch costs (i.e., worse performance when responding to the other level than on a previous trial), even though level cueing effects indicated anticipatory deployment of attention to the upcoming target level. To investigate the interplay of attentional preparation and persistence, we applied a probe trial method assumed to ensure a high degree of preparation for the upcoming target level and minimizing stimulus-specific proactive interference. Mirroring previous findings obtained in the domain of spatial attention, we found evidence for anticipatory attentional focusing on global/local target levels but not for persistence of the attentional set adopted on the previous trial. In a second experiment, we prevented preparation for upcoming attentional demands (in both global-local and spatial attention tasks). This resulted in the modulation of performance (in critical probe trials) by the attentional demands of the predecessor trial. Together, our findings demonstrate sensitivity of the probe trial method for attentional persistence and raise the possibility that such persistence can be completely eliminated by sufficiently strong preparation for the attentional demands of the following trial.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:59:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b553dc10f5394d36a6f10b790122192f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0001-6918
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:59:02Z
publishDate 2024-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Acta Psychologica
spelling doaj.art-b553dc10f5394d36a6f10b790122192f2024-04-14T04:09:55ZengElsevierActa Psychologica0001-69182024-05-01245104205Preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures: Evidence from intermixed probe trialsSvantje T. Kähler0Mike Wendt1Imke M. Dühnen2Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez3Thomas Jacobsen4Experimental Psychology Unit, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Germany; Corresponding author at: Experimental Psychology Unit, University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043 Hamburg, Germany.Department of Psychology, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Institute for Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyExperimental Psychology Unit, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, GermanyExperimental Psychology Unit, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, GermanyExperimental Psychology Unit, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, GermanyAttention can be directed to the global or local level of a visual stimulus (i.e., Navon figure). Previous studies yielded reliable trial-to-trial level switch costs (i.e., worse performance when responding to the other level than on a previous trial), even though level cueing effects indicated anticipatory deployment of attention to the upcoming target level. To investigate the interplay of attentional preparation and persistence, we applied a probe trial method assumed to ensure a high degree of preparation for the upcoming target level and minimizing stimulus-specific proactive interference. Mirroring previous findings obtained in the domain of spatial attention, we found evidence for anticipatory attentional focusing on global/local target levels but not for persistence of the attentional set adopted on the previous trial. In a second experiment, we prevented preparation for upcoming attentional demands (in both global-local and spatial attention tasks). This resulted in the modulation of performance (in critical probe trials) by the attentional demands of the predecessor trial. Together, our findings demonstrate sensitivity of the probe trial method for attentional persistence and raise the possibility that such persistence can be completely eliminated by sufficiently strong preparation for the attentional demands of the following trial.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824000829Global/local processingSelective attentionTask preparation
spellingShingle Svantje T. Kähler
Mike Wendt
Imke M. Dühnen
Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez
Thomas Jacobsen
Preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures: Evidence from intermixed probe trials
Acta Psychologica
Global/local processing
Selective attention
Task preparation
title Preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures: Evidence from intermixed probe trials
title_full Preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures: Evidence from intermixed probe trials
title_fullStr Preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures: Evidence from intermixed probe trials
title_full_unstemmed Preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures: Evidence from intermixed probe trials
title_short Preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures: Evidence from intermixed probe trials
title_sort preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures evidence from intermixed probe trials
topic Global/local processing
Selective attention
Task preparation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824000829
work_keys_str_mv AT svantjetkahler preparationandpersistenceofdeployingattentiontolocationsorstimulusstructuresevidencefromintermixedprobetrials
AT mikewendt preparationandpersistenceofdeployingattentiontolocationsorstimulusstructuresevidencefromintermixedprobetrials
AT imkemduhnen preparationandpersistenceofdeployingattentiontolocationsorstimulusstructuresevidencefromintermixedprobetrials
AT aquileslunarodriguez preparationandpersistenceofdeployingattentiontolocationsorstimulusstructuresevidencefromintermixedprobetrials
AT thomasjacobsen preparationandpersistenceofdeployingattentiontolocationsorstimulusstructuresevidencefromintermixedprobetrials