Recruitment in randomized clinical trials: The MeMeMe experience.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Recruitment is essential for the success of clinical trials. We are conducting a randomized clinical trial to test the effect of a Mediterranean dietary intervention with or without 1700 mg/day of metformin for the prevention of age-related chronic diseases, the MeMe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ivan Baldassari, Andreina Oliverio, Vittorio Krogh, Eleonora Bruno, Giuliana Gargano, Mauro Cortellini, Alice Casagrande, Maria G Di Mauro, Elisabetta Venturelli, Daniela Del Sette Cerulli, Bellegotti Manuela, Franco Berrino, Patrizia Pasanisi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265495
_version_ 1811306091272732672
author Ivan Baldassari
Andreina Oliverio
Vittorio Krogh
Eleonora Bruno
Giuliana Gargano
Mauro Cortellini
Alice Casagrande
Maria G Di Mauro
Elisabetta Venturelli
Daniela Del Sette Cerulli
Bellegotti Manuela
Franco Berrino
Patrizia Pasanisi
author_facet Ivan Baldassari
Andreina Oliverio
Vittorio Krogh
Eleonora Bruno
Giuliana Gargano
Mauro Cortellini
Alice Casagrande
Maria G Di Mauro
Elisabetta Venturelli
Daniela Del Sette Cerulli
Bellegotti Manuela
Franco Berrino
Patrizia Pasanisi
author_sort Ivan Baldassari
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Recruitment is essential for the success of clinical trials. We are conducting a randomized clinical trial to test the effect of a Mediterranean dietary intervention with or without 1700 mg/day of metformin for the prevention of age-related chronic diseases, the MeMeMe trial (Trial registration number: EudraCT number: 2012-005427-32 ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02960711). MeMeMe recruiting experience, highlighting strengths, limitations encountered and results is reported.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Statistical analysis focused on the reasons for withdrawal according to the recruitment method ("active" versus "passive" criterion) and the time of withdrawal. Logistic regression models were used to explore the associations between the risk of withdrawal and sex, recruitment method, randomization arm, and with markers of compliance to the intervention, such as one-year change in body weight.<h4>Results</h4>Out of 2035 volunteers, 660 (32.4%) were recruited "actively" and 1375 (67.6%) "passively". Among people who dropped out of the trial after randomization, there were 19.5% for the "active" and 22.0% for the "passive" method (p = 0.28). The risk of withdrawal was significantly higher in women (OR:1.91; 95% CI:1.17-3.12; p = 0.01), in volunteers older at recruitment (OR:1.25; 95% CI:1.07-1.45; p = 0.004), and in those with a higher BMI at baseline (OR:1.23; 95% CI:1.07-1.43; p = 0.004). Volunteers who lost at least 2 kg (the median weight change) in the first year of intervention were significantly less (53%) likely to withdraw from the trial (OR:0.48; 95% CI:0.30-0.75; p = 0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Our findings suggest that the "passive" recruitment method was more effective than the "active" one to advance recruitment. The benefits of "passive" recruitment hardly outweighed the drawbacks.<h4>Trial registration</h4>Trial registration number: EudraCT number: 2012-005427-32. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02960711.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T08:38:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b56294ab749c4e81954af14c0531cc65
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T08:38:12Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-b56294ab749c4e81954af14c0531cc652022-12-22T02:54:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01173e026549510.1371/journal.pone.0265495Recruitment in randomized clinical trials: The MeMeMe experience.Ivan BaldassariAndreina OliverioVittorio KroghEleonora BrunoGiuliana GarganoMauro CortelliniAlice CasagrandeMaria G Di MauroElisabetta VenturelliDaniela Del Sette CerulliBellegotti ManuelaFranco BerrinoPatrizia Pasanisi<h4>Introduction</h4>Recruitment is essential for the success of clinical trials. We are conducting a randomized clinical trial to test the effect of a Mediterranean dietary intervention with or without 1700 mg/day of metformin for the prevention of age-related chronic diseases, the MeMeMe trial (Trial registration number: EudraCT number: 2012-005427-32 ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02960711). MeMeMe recruiting experience, highlighting strengths, limitations encountered and results is reported.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Statistical analysis focused on the reasons for withdrawal according to the recruitment method ("active" versus "passive" criterion) and the time of withdrawal. Logistic regression models were used to explore the associations between the risk of withdrawal and sex, recruitment method, randomization arm, and with markers of compliance to the intervention, such as one-year change in body weight.<h4>Results</h4>Out of 2035 volunteers, 660 (32.4%) were recruited "actively" and 1375 (67.6%) "passively". Among people who dropped out of the trial after randomization, there were 19.5% for the "active" and 22.0% for the "passive" method (p = 0.28). The risk of withdrawal was significantly higher in women (OR:1.91; 95% CI:1.17-3.12; p = 0.01), in volunteers older at recruitment (OR:1.25; 95% CI:1.07-1.45; p = 0.004), and in those with a higher BMI at baseline (OR:1.23; 95% CI:1.07-1.43; p = 0.004). Volunteers who lost at least 2 kg (the median weight change) in the first year of intervention were significantly less (53%) likely to withdraw from the trial (OR:0.48; 95% CI:0.30-0.75; p = 0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Our findings suggest that the "passive" recruitment method was more effective than the "active" one to advance recruitment. The benefits of "passive" recruitment hardly outweighed the drawbacks.<h4>Trial registration</h4>Trial registration number: EudraCT number: 2012-005427-32. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02960711.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265495
spellingShingle Ivan Baldassari
Andreina Oliverio
Vittorio Krogh
Eleonora Bruno
Giuliana Gargano
Mauro Cortellini
Alice Casagrande
Maria G Di Mauro
Elisabetta Venturelli
Daniela Del Sette Cerulli
Bellegotti Manuela
Franco Berrino
Patrizia Pasanisi
Recruitment in randomized clinical trials: The MeMeMe experience.
PLoS ONE
title Recruitment in randomized clinical trials: The MeMeMe experience.
title_full Recruitment in randomized clinical trials: The MeMeMe experience.
title_fullStr Recruitment in randomized clinical trials: The MeMeMe experience.
title_full_unstemmed Recruitment in randomized clinical trials: The MeMeMe experience.
title_short Recruitment in randomized clinical trials: The MeMeMe experience.
title_sort recruitment in randomized clinical trials the mememe experience
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265495
work_keys_str_mv AT ivanbaldassari recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT andreinaoliverio recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT vittoriokrogh recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT eleonorabruno recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT giulianagargano recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT maurocortellini recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT alicecasagrande recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT mariagdimauro recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT elisabettaventurelli recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT danieladelsettecerulli recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT bellegottimanuela recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT francoberrino recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience
AT patriziapasanisi recruitmentinrandomizedclinicaltrialsthemememeexperience