Staplers versus energy devices for the intersegmental plane separation in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a comparative study

Abstract Background In segmentectomy, in addition to the anatomy of the segmental hilum, the identification and separation of the intersegmental plane is also an important step of the operation. Because of its simplicity and high efficiency, most thoracic surgeons choose the staplers. But the energy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiajun Han, Hongjie Yu, Haitao Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02070-8
_version_ 1811198348705660928
author Jiajun Han
Hongjie Yu
Haitao Ma
author_facet Jiajun Han
Hongjie Yu
Haitao Ma
author_sort Jiajun Han
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In segmentectomy, in addition to the anatomy of the segmental hilum, the identification and separation of the intersegmental plane is also an important step of the operation. Because of its simplicity and high efficiency, most thoracic surgeons choose the staplers. But the energy devices also have its unique advantages in the separation of the intersegmental plane. This study compared the clinical efficacy of staplers and energy devices in the separation of the intersegmental planes during the uniport thoracoscopic segmentectomy through the clinical data. Methods Clinical data of 89 patients undergoing uniport VATS lung segmentectomy from January 2019 to October 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different treatment methods of intersegmental plane, the patients were divided into two groups, 55 in the stapler group and 34 in the energy device group. The clinical data of the two groups were compared and analyzed statistically. And the univariate and multivariate logistic regression were also used to explore the influencing factors of postoperative complications. Results Lung segmentectomy was successfully operated in both groups. There were statistically significant differences in operative duration, number of staplers used, surgical expenses and postoperative complications (P < 0.05). In terms of general data, including tumor location, operative hemorrhage, drainage volume on the first postoperative day, total postoperative drainage volume, postoperative chest tube retention duration, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative blood routine indexes, and postoperative pulmonary function indexes after 3 months, no significant differences were observed (P > 0.05). Smoking history (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.05–24.56, P = 0.043) and intersegmental plane treatment (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.11–9.14, P = 0.031) were risk factors for postoperative complications. Patients of the energy device group had a higher incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions In uniport thoracoscopic segmentectomy, the use of energy devices to treat the intersegmental plane will result in longer operative duration and higher postoperative complication rate, but it does not affect postoperative recovery and can help reduce surgical expenses. Both methods are safe and reliable. Clinically, the two methods can be reasonably selected according to the specific situation.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T01:30:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b564a557880944f0bc4e2d8b6acd31cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-8090
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T01:30:01Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-b564a557880944f0bc4e2d8b6acd31cb2022-12-22T03:53:32ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902022-12-011711810.1186/s13019-022-02070-8Staplers versus energy devices for the intersegmental plane separation in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a comparative studyJiajun Han0Hongjie Yu1Haitao Ma2Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityAbstract Background In segmentectomy, in addition to the anatomy of the segmental hilum, the identification and separation of the intersegmental plane is also an important step of the operation. Because of its simplicity and high efficiency, most thoracic surgeons choose the staplers. But the energy devices also have its unique advantages in the separation of the intersegmental plane. This study compared the clinical efficacy of staplers and energy devices in the separation of the intersegmental planes during the uniport thoracoscopic segmentectomy through the clinical data. Methods Clinical data of 89 patients undergoing uniport VATS lung segmentectomy from January 2019 to October 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different treatment methods of intersegmental plane, the patients were divided into two groups, 55 in the stapler group and 34 in the energy device group. The clinical data of the two groups were compared and analyzed statistically. And the univariate and multivariate logistic regression were also used to explore the influencing factors of postoperative complications. Results Lung segmentectomy was successfully operated in both groups. There were statistically significant differences in operative duration, number of staplers used, surgical expenses and postoperative complications (P < 0.05). In terms of general data, including tumor location, operative hemorrhage, drainage volume on the first postoperative day, total postoperative drainage volume, postoperative chest tube retention duration, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative blood routine indexes, and postoperative pulmonary function indexes after 3 months, no significant differences were observed (P > 0.05). Smoking history (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.05–24.56, P = 0.043) and intersegmental plane treatment (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.11–9.14, P = 0.031) were risk factors for postoperative complications. Patients of the energy device group had a higher incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions In uniport thoracoscopic segmentectomy, the use of energy devices to treat the intersegmental plane will result in longer operative duration and higher postoperative complication rate, but it does not affect postoperative recovery and can help reduce surgical expenses. Both methods are safe and reliable. Clinically, the two methods can be reasonably selected according to the specific situation.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02070-8Lung segmentectomyEnergy deviceStaplerIntersegmental planePulmonary function
spellingShingle Jiajun Han
Hongjie Yu
Haitao Ma
Staplers versus energy devices for the intersegmental plane separation in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a comparative study
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Lung segmentectomy
Energy device
Stapler
Intersegmental plane
Pulmonary function
title Staplers versus energy devices for the intersegmental plane separation in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a comparative study
title_full Staplers versus energy devices for the intersegmental plane separation in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a comparative study
title_fullStr Staplers versus energy devices for the intersegmental plane separation in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Staplers versus energy devices for the intersegmental plane separation in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a comparative study
title_short Staplers versus energy devices for the intersegmental plane separation in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a comparative study
title_sort staplers versus energy devices for the intersegmental plane separation in thoracoscopic segmentectomy a comparative study
topic Lung segmentectomy
Energy device
Stapler
Intersegmental plane
Pulmonary function
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02070-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jiajunhan staplersversusenergydevicesfortheintersegmentalplaneseparationinthoracoscopicsegmentectomyacomparativestudy
AT hongjieyu staplersversusenergydevicesfortheintersegmentalplaneseparationinthoracoscopicsegmentectomyacomparativestudy
AT haitaoma staplersversusenergydevicesfortheintersegmentalplaneseparationinthoracoscopicsegmentectomyacomparativestudy