Optimum économique et efficience historiographique dans l’Histoire des deux Indes

Published from 1770 to 1780, Raynal’s Histoire des deux Indes, to which Diderot contributed, questions the legitimacy and usefulness of the colonies, and the best way to retain them and to make them profitable. Raynal and Diderot were equally aware that the reforming power of their work would depend...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muriel Brot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut du Monde Anglophone
Series:Etudes Epistémè
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/17693
_version_ 1797223252402110464
author Muriel Brot
author_facet Muriel Brot
author_sort Muriel Brot
collection DOAJ
description Published from 1770 to 1780, Raynal’s Histoire des deux Indes, to which Diderot contributed, questions the legitimacy and usefulness of the colonies, and the best way to retain them and to make them profitable. Raynal and Diderot were equally aware that the reforming power of their work would depend on its didactic force, that promoting an optimal mode of colonisation would require an efficient historiography. As a result, they questioned and opposed each other on the best way to write the history of the Indies. As the search for effectiveness and efficiency appears at all levels of the work, from its conception to its writing, this study analyses the two authors’ divergent historiographical strategies, which led them to open up the field of colonial history to apparently disparate data, thus making it a fundamental economic and political work.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:34:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b56d003327c9477aa6806411bacec8a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1634-0450
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:34:16Z
publisher Institut du Monde Anglophone
record_format Article
series Etudes Epistémè
spelling doaj.art-b56d003327c9477aa6806411bacec8a32024-04-04T09:25:54ZengInstitut du Monde AnglophoneEtudes Epistémè1634-04504410.4000/episteme.17693Optimum économique et efficience historiographique dans l’Histoire des deux IndesMuriel BrotPublished from 1770 to 1780, Raynal’s Histoire des deux Indes, to which Diderot contributed, questions the legitimacy and usefulness of the colonies, and the best way to retain them and to make them profitable. Raynal and Diderot were equally aware that the reforming power of their work would depend on its didactic force, that promoting an optimal mode of colonisation would require an efficient historiography. As a result, they questioned and opposed each other on the best way to write the history of the Indies. As the search for effectiveness and efficiency appears at all levels of the work, from its conception to its writing, this study analyses the two authors’ divergent historiographical strategies, which led them to open up the field of colonial history to apparently disparate data, thus making it a fundamental economic and political work.https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/17693DiderothistoriographyRaynalcolonies
spellingShingle Muriel Brot
Optimum économique et efficience historiographique dans l’Histoire des deux Indes
Etudes Epistémè
Diderot
historiography
Raynal
colonies
title Optimum économique et efficience historiographique dans l’Histoire des deux Indes
title_full Optimum économique et efficience historiographique dans l’Histoire des deux Indes
title_fullStr Optimum économique et efficience historiographique dans l’Histoire des deux Indes
title_full_unstemmed Optimum économique et efficience historiographique dans l’Histoire des deux Indes
title_short Optimum économique et efficience historiographique dans l’Histoire des deux Indes
title_sort optimum economique et efficience historiographique dans l histoire des deux indes
topic Diderot
historiography
Raynal
colonies
url https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/17693
work_keys_str_mv AT murielbrot optimumeconomiqueetefficiencehistoriographiquedanslhistoiredesdeuxindes