Compensation for damages from the consequences of environmental crimes
The subject of this study is the social and legal nature of compensation for damage or other reparation for harm caused by environmental crimes. Currently, at the legislative level, there is no exhaustive list of possible ways to compensate for the rights violated as a result of a committed socially...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EDP Sciences
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | BIO Web of Conferences |
| Online Access: | https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/pdf/2023/10/bioconf_ebwff2023_08002.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797673811153256448 |
|---|---|
| author | Korneev Sergey Alpatova Svetlana Rudenko Aleksandr Fedotova Evgeniya |
| author_facet | Korneev Sergey Alpatova Svetlana Rudenko Aleksandr Fedotova Evgeniya |
| author_sort | Korneev Sergey |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The subject of this study is the social and legal nature of compensation for damage or other reparation for harm caused by environmental crimes. Currently, at the legislative level, there is no exhaustive list of possible ways to compensate for the rights violated as a result of a committed socially dangerous act containing all the signs of a crime. As a result, law enforcement agencies in the course of proceedings in a specific criminal case are vested with the right to independently assess specific post-criminal positive activity of a person who committed a crime and decide on its compliance with the method of making amends. At the same time, delegated powers in theory are perceived ambiguously. The purpose of the authors is to determine the essence and admissibility of a broad interpretation of the concept of “compensation for damage or other reparation for harm” in criminal law. Based on the analysis of provisions of current criminal legislation, clarifications of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Russian Federation, investigative and judicial practice, doctrinal studies in the field of criminal, as well as environmental law, the authors come to the following conclusion. The list of ways to make amends for the harm caused by environmental crimes cannot be exhaustive (closed), and specific post-criminal socially beneficial actions must be legal and not infringe on the rights of third parties. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T21:49:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b5706898e65943c7af50828640e835fc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2117-4458 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T21:49:49Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | EDP Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BIO Web of Conferences |
| spelling | doaj.art-b5706898e65943c7af50828640e835fc2023-09-26T10:10:04ZengEDP SciencesBIO Web of Conferences2117-44582023-01-01650800210.1051/bioconf/20236508002bioconf_ebwff2023_08002Compensation for damages from the consequences of environmental crimesKorneev Sergey0Alpatova Svetlana1Rudenko Aleksandr2Fedotova Evgeniya3Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of RussiaAcademy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of RussiaAcademy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of RussiaAcademy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of RussiaThe subject of this study is the social and legal nature of compensation for damage or other reparation for harm caused by environmental crimes. Currently, at the legislative level, there is no exhaustive list of possible ways to compensate for the rights violated as a result of a committed socially dangerous act containing all the signs of a crime. As a result, law enforcement agencies in the course of proceedings in a specific criminal case are vested with the right to independently assess specific post-criminal positive activity of a person who committed a crime and decide on its compliance with the method of making amends. At the same time, delegated powers in theory are perceived ambiguously. The purpose of the authors is to determine the essence and admissibility of a broad interpretation of the concept of “compensation for damage or other reparation for harm” in criminal law. Based on the analysis of provisions of current criminal legislation, clarifications of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Russian Federation, investigative and judicial practice, doctrinal studies in the field of criminal, as well as environmental law, the authors come to the following conclusion. The list of ways to make amends for the harm caused by environmental crimes cannot be exhaustive (closed), and specific post-criminal socially beneficial actions must be legal and not infringe on the rights of third parties.https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/pdf/2023/10/bioconf_ebwff2023_08002.pdf |
| spellingShingle | Korneev Sergey Alpatova Svetlana Rudenko Aleksandr Fedotova Evgeniya Compensation for damages from the consequences of environmental crimes BIO Web of Conferences |
| title | Compensation for damages from the consequences of environmental crimes |
| title_full | Compensation for damages from the consequences of environmental crimes |
| title_fullStr | Compensation for damages from the consequences of environmental crimes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Compensation for damages from the consequences of environmental crimes |
| title_short | Compensation for damages from the consequences of environmental crimes |
| title_sort | compensation for damages from the consequences of environmental crimes |
| url | https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/pdf/2023/10/bioconf_ebwff2023_08002.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT korneevsergey compensationfordamagesfromtheconsequencesofenvironmentalcrimes AT alpatovasvetlana compensationfordamagesfromtheconsequencesofenvironmentalcrimes AT rudenkoaleksandr compensationfordamagesfromtheconsequencesofenvironmentalcrimes AT fedotovaevgeniya compensationfordamagesfromtheconsequencesofenvironmentalcrimes |